Hi,
I found the 2nd public review of Li18nux Locale Name Guideline
has started.
http://www.hauN.org/ml/b-l-j/a/800/840.html
http://www.li18nux.org/subgroups/sa/locnameguide/index.html
The page says that comments are welcome until 14 Feb 2002.
Any additions from Li18nux insiders?
---
Tomohiro
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:55:17 +
Markus Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you could do is either prefix each release with some release
indicator symbol, or add for instance 0x20 to a Unicode character to
turn it into a release code. Both approaches allow you to use a normal
UTF-8
Tomohiro Kubota wrote:
I found the 2nd public review of Li18nux Locale Name Guideline
has started.
http://www.hauN.org/ml/b-l-j/a/800/840.html
http://www.li18nux.org/subgroups/sa/locnameguide/index.html
The page says that comments are welcome until 14 Feb 2002.
Any additions from
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Michael B Allen wrote:
With a hint from of Mr. Dickey, I believe the private \E[?1515h and
\E[?1515l sequences are appropriate.
the pointer which Paul Williams gave (for key position mode) is probably
more promising.
--
T.E.Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Michael B Allen wrote:
With a hint from of Mr. Dickey, I believe the private \E[?1515h
and \E[?1515l sequences are appropriate.
the pointer which Paul Williams gave (for key position mode) is
probably more promising.
Heh heh, I'll have to
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Paul Williams wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Michael B Allen wrote:
With a hint from of Mr. Dickey, I believe the private \E[?1515h
and \E[?1515l sequences are appropriate.
the pointer which Paul Williams gave (for key position mode) is
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG DE_de.ISO-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG de_DE.Iso-8859-1@EURO
Do you think an average user can guess which one of these he has to
type? No GUI available!
If the average user is having to choose between those 3 possibilities,
then
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG DE_de.ISO-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG de_DE.Iso-8859-1@EURO
Do you think an average user can guess which one of these he has to
type? No GUI available!
If the user has to *type* one of
Henry Spencer wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG DE_de.ISO-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG de_DE.Iso-8859-1@EURO
Do you think an average user can guess which one of these he has to
type? No GUI available!
If the
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
You can write a menu system, which will list the legitimate choices and
ask him which one he wants, in twenty lines of shell script...
Nice idea. However, that this menu system shell script still has to be
made is enough proof that, in practice,
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 15:31, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Henry Spencer wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG DE_de.ISO-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG de_DE.Iso-8859-1@EURO
Do you think an average user can guess which one of
Kaixo!
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:47:48PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Usability is provided by GUI selection tools, not by softening syntax
specs. The case sensitivity makes a lot of sense as ISO's language and
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG
Kaixo!
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:05:23AM -0500, Henry Spencer wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
setenv LANG de_DE.iso-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG DE_de.ISO-8859-1@euro
setenv LANG de_DE.Iso-8859-1@EURO
Do you think an average user can guess which one of these he
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:18:09PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
Hi,
I found the 2nd public review of Li18nux Locale Name Guideline
has started.
http://www.hauN.org/ml/b-l-j/a/800/840.html
http://www.li18nux.org/subgroups/sa/locnameguide/index.html
The page says that comments are
Hi,
At Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:18:09 +0900,
Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
I found the 2nd public review of Li18nux Locale Name Guideline
has started.
http://www.hauN.org/ml/b-l-j/a/800/840.html
http://www.li18nux.org/subgroups/sa/locnameguide/index.html
One important note. I am not a member of
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:19:09 +
Paul Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear more from the original poster about the requirement for
this encoding, and why it would need to be transparent to Linux console
and PuTTY. Without wishing to be rude, I think the problem should be
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:49:56PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
However, it's important to remember that a bad standard is better than
no standard. It is extremely difficult to change a bad standard, it
is true. But it's even harder to change no standard, and in the
meantime users
17 matches
Mail list logo