> It's UTF-8..UTF-8 support is good as far as it goes but there's no support
> for double width characters.
The next version of screen will support double width UTF-8 chars.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main(_){while(_=~getchar())p
Tomohiro KUBOTA writes:
> However, softwares of GNU Project will have to be assigned to FSF.
> (Note the difference between merely GPL-ed softwares and GNU Project
> softwares.) This FSF's way is to guard itself legally.
This is not true in this generality. There are packages in the GNU
project
> X11 license is compatible with the GPL. This means X11-licensed softwares
> can be used as a basis of GPL-ed softwares. However, softwares of GNU
> Project will have to be assigned to FSF. (Note the difference between
> merely GPL-ed softwares and GNU Project softwares.) This FSF's way is
>
Hi,
At Wed, 4 Jul 2001 20:39:30 +0100 (BST),
Robert de Bath wrote:
> Oops, I just went back to the GNU site; wrong licence.
> The _X11_ licence is compatible with the GPL ...
> so what's the problem Juliusz? You won't be using GPL code from outside
> in luit so there's no 'infection'.
X11 lice
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Robert de Bath wrote:
> > On 1 Jul 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > > RB> Tho I do agree that luit should be integrated into screen eventually.
> > > Impossible for licensing reasons. I should hope that luit will get
> > > into the
Kaixo!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> You can even add LGPLed code to MIT-licences code without anything
> bad happening to either.
Not exactly, you can *link* code under LGPL with MIT-licences code.
But you cannot put LGPL code in a same file with other non (L)G
Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The GPL is an absolutely fabulous idea, but since there is so much
> unjustified phobia around it, I'd recommed to donate anything that you
> produce related to support the use of UTF-8 under POSIX to the public
> domain (as I did with all my font and other UCS
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Robert de Bath wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > RB> Tho I do agree that luit should be integrated into screen eventually.
> > Impossible for licensing reasons. I should hope that luit will get
> > into the XFree86 tree.
> Shame, I assume you're using code
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> RB> Tho I do agree that luit should be integrated into screen eventually.
>
> Impossible for licensing reasons. I should hope that luit will get
> into the XFree86 tree.
What are those reasons? Why can't it be dual-licensed?
Edmund
-
Linux-UTF8: i18
On 1 Jul 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> RB> Tho I do agree that luit should be integrated into screen eventually.
>
> Impossible for licensing reasons. I should hope that luit will get
> into the XFree86 tree.
Shame, I assume you're using code that has to stay under the MIT licence.
I've ju
10 matches
Mail list logo
