On 05/12/11 21:38, Michele wrote:
I've made some tests on this camera and I've had some mixed results.
[/snip]
I've writtent this to warn other linux users tha this is a bad camera anyway
and one mustn't be fooled by the Philips brand on it, has absolutely nothing
to do with the company that
On 31/10/11 23:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I seem to recall some discussion about a
hack/patch/quirk to get several of the newer HD cameras to work
in mjpg mode on a single usb hub/bus.
Does anybody know if this has made it into the uvc
On 02/11/11 17:38, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Friday 07 October 2011 14:00:03 Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 07/10/11 10:42, Alexey Fisher wrote:
Am 07.10.2011 10:59, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 06/10/11 17:28, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 18:16, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 06
On 02/11/11 18:17, Philip Gladstone wrote:
On 11/2/2011 12:19 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
i looked at this for similar reasons as you a few months ago.
as i recall, there was just one line to change to essentially
disable the bandwidth limitations, just changing the calculated
bandwidth to
I seem to recall some discussion about a
hack/patch/quirk to get several of the newer HD cameras to work in
mjpg mode on a single usb hub/bus.
Does anybody know if this has made it into the uvc driver, and if
yes, after which version.
Just to
Hello all,
Would it be possible to add the corresponding note next to the Microsoft
LifeCam Studio in the supported devices list on the Linux uvc website
(http://www.ideasonboard.org/uvc/), so that people will know that it has
the same usb bandwidth bug as the Microsoft LifeCam Cinema,
On 06/10/11 17:28, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 18:16, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 06/10/11 15:59, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 14:32, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hello list,
The above two cameras, which have the well known usb bandwidth bug under
Linux don't seem to display
On 07/10/11 10:42, Alexey Fisher wrote:
Am 07.10.2011 10:59, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 06/10/11 17:28, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 18:16, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 06/10/11 15:59, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 14:32, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hello list,
The above two
Hello list,
The above two cameras, which have the well known usb bandwidth bug under
Linux don't seem to display the same problems under Windows. I've tried
them under Windows Vista and Windows 7 32bit. I've managed to display a
LifeCam Studio and LifeCam Cinema at the same time through
On 06/10/11 15:59, Alexey Fisher wrote:
On 06.10.2011 14:32, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hello list,
The above two cameras, which have the well known usb bandwidth bug under
Linux don't seem to display the same problems under Windows. I've tried
them under Windows Vista and Windows 7 32bit. I've
On 03/06/11 06:25, Duck Tayp wrote:
I tried this with a Lifecam Studio and a Microsoft VX 6000 connected to
the same USB hub and could view live video simultaneously from both. My
impression of the Lifecam Studio: excellent video and audio quality
(even in low light), and it just works (at
simultaneously from both. My
impression of the Lifecam Studio: excellent video and audio quality
(even in low light), and it just works (at least on the Ubuntu
versions I've tried --- 10.10 and up).
On 05/20/2011 07:46 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I really liked the Microsoft LifeCam Cinema webcam
Hi,
On 04/29/2011 09:56 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 10:42:14 Paulo Assis wrote:
1. Would this be fairly specific to the Logitech QuickCam 9000, or is a
more generic issue with webcam sensors?
Neither, you just need to lower exposure time.
2. Are other
This might not be entirely related to the UVC driver, but there seems to
be a great pool of knowledge about webcams here, so I appreciate any
feedback on this.
I am using some Logitech QuickCam Pro 9000 cameras for a cctv project.
Footage recorded by the camera of people/objects on the move
On 04/27/2011 09:42 AM, Paulo Assis wrote:
Hi,
1. Would this be fairly specific to the Logitech QuickCam 9000, or is a more
generic issue with webcam sensors?
Neither, you just need to lower exposure time.
2. Are other webcams better in this respect?
I don't think so, you can control
On 03/31/2011 12:04 PM, Клиентский отдел \Кибернет\ wrote:
Thanks to all for your answers.
Current disposition:
Gentoo linux: 2.6.36-r8 (kernel uvcvideo driver). I'm testing
2.6.37.5-zen patched kernel (zen-kernel.org). It slightly reduce total
cpu utilisation.
But in embedded usb-bus and
On 03/29/2011 10:26 PM, Paul Jurczak wrote:
/snip
You could always install another PCI or PCI-e USB card -
which will give you another 4-5 USB ports - but more
importantly, another USB root hub, separate from the one on
the motherboard. That's what I did to run 6 webcams at
640x480 (but using
Hi,
On 03/29/2011 01:59 PM, Alexey Fisher wrote:
/snip
But I unable to attach more webcams. These cams have no mjpeg. Could
anybody help me to apply quirks or recalculate bandwith to use more
webcams. As I understood no space on left device message depends on
i assume it mean your hard
18 matches
Mail list logo
