The NX It worked alright for me with luvcview, but it didn't seem to
work too well with anything else. I could test some more stuff on it,
if you've got any requests.
--Murph
On 7/30/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> On Friday 20 July 2007, Morten Mortensen wrote:
>
Hi Morten,
On Friday 20 July 2007, Morten Mortensen wrote:
> - I have made a quick skimming through the source code (as found within
> your subversion repository circa two days ago), because I was hunting
> something looking like module options, but I found none. I did find
> something else - some
- I have made a quick skimming through the source code (as found within your
subversion repository circa two days ago), because I was hunting something
looking like module options, but I found none. I did find something else - some
registration of the Microsoft LifeCam NX-6000.
The Microsoft
Hi,
Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> Hello,
>> I tried to install a lifecam NX-6000 on my gentoo.
>> I have tried with the ebuild and with the svn. In both case my problem
>> is the same.
>> When I modprobe uvcvideo I get this messages in dmesg:
>>
>>
>> uvcvideo: Found UVC 1.00 device M
Hi,
> Hello,
> I tried to install a lifecam NX-6000 on my gentoo.
> I have tried with the ebuild and with the svn. In both case my problem
> is the same.
> When I modprobe uvcvideo I get this messages in dmesg:
>
>
> uvcvideo: Found UVC 1.00 device Microsoft� LifeCam NX-6000 (045e:00f8)
> uv
Hello,
I tried to install a lifecam NX-6000 on my gentoo.
I have tried with the ebuild and with the svn. In both case my problem
is the same.
When I modprobe uvcvideo I get this messages in dmesg:
uvcvideo: Found UVC 1.00 device Microsoft� LifeCam NX-6000 (045e:00f8)
uvcvideo: Failed t
Le Lundi 22 Janvier 2007 23:31, James Studdart a écrit :
James,
> Well, I'll be damned... luvcview works!
Cool :)
> Colour looks a bit off but I'll
Did you try to adjust the gamma setting ?
Can you take a picture with luvcview and mail me the file ?
> look at that later and quality is low, but i
Hi Olivier,
I forgot to mention you will need to load the firmware before the camera will
be recognised by the driver.
I attached a quick-and-dirty code to extract the firmware from the MacOSX
driver and load it in the webcam. The code comes from a patch written by
Ronald Bultje. My goal is to
Well, I'll be damned... luvcview works! Colour looks a bit off but I'll
look at that later and quality is low, but it might just be the camera.
I'll get a fresh version of the uvc code base and make sure it's just
those changes in the diff that make it work and let you know.
So, it's a bit wo
Hi James,
> So sometimes, just sometimes uvcapture runs through Not sure why or
> how yet. I get a file, which is attached, but it either contains junk or
> something strange. It's not a jpeg anyway. Anyone have any ideas what it
> is?
It definitely contains JPEG data in random order. It look
Hi James,
> > Could you raise the trace level to 255 (modprobe uvcvideo trace=255) ?
> > The driver should get much more verbose then.
>
> Good call. It's getting to uvc_queue_waiton(buf, nonblocking) around
> line 294 in uvc_queue.c. I'm guessing it's waiting for the camera to
> become ready and
Hi Olivier,
> > Nice to know. The Apple iSight was high on the list of broken cams, but
> > it seems the Microsoft ones might beat it :-)
>
> any progress on the iSight support ? I will be happy to help by testing
> it. ;)
I haven't made any progress myself (as I don't own any Mac), and haven't h
So sometimes, just sometimes uvcapture runs through Not sure why or
how yet. I get a file, which is attached, but it either contains junk or
something strange. It's not a jpeg anyway. Anyone have any ideas what it is?
Cheers,
James.
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi James,
see attached f
> Could you raise the trace level to 255 (modprobe uvcvideo trace=255) ? The
> driver should get much more verbose then.
>
Good call. It's getting to uvc_queue_waiton(buf, nonblocking) around
line 294 in uvc_queue.c. I'm guessing it's waiting for the camera to
become ready and it never does
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 05:27:54PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Nice to know. The Apple iSight was high on the list of broken cams, but it
> seems the Microsoft ones might beat it :-)
any progress on the iSight support ? I will be happy to help by testing
it. ;)
Thanks in advance for
Hi James,
> see attached for a svn diff. Be aware that I've not much idea what I'm
> doing with this code, blindly fumbling in the dark at the moment, so I'm
> certainly not advocating what I've changed! The changes do make the
> camera load though.
>
> > Having a look at the descriptors, the dev
Hi,
see attached for a svn diff. Be aware that I've not much idea what I'm
doing with this code, blindly fumbling in the dark at the moment, so I'm
certainly not advocating what I've changed! The changes do make the
camera load though.
Having a look at the descriptors, the device shouldn't req
Hi James,
> so after spending the last few hours messing with the UVC code trying
> to get this to work, it's loading but I need help.
Just out of curiosity, what modifications have you made to the driver to get
the camera detected ? Having a look at the descriptors, the device shouldn't
requi
Hi,
so after spending the last few hours messing with the UVC code trying
to get this to work, it's loading but I need help. UVC is getting the
formats fine and it creates /dev/video0, but no program I've tried
works. I can't install sdl-dev at the moment (damn dependencies) which
means I've n
19 matches
Mail list logo
