Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] Recommended, best supported/least buggy camera

2007-04-24 Thread Paulo Marques
Joel Ebel wrote: > Ah. ok. I was under the impression the bug was only in the Fusion. I > like the design of the Fusion, so I guess we'll run with it, and if we > have problems, we'll try the reset patch. FWIW, I would like to give a quick summary of the worst problems I found when using a Log

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] Recommended, best supported/least buggy camera

2007-04-11 Thread Joel Ebel
Ah. ok. I was under the impression the bug was only in the Fusion. I like the design of the Fusion, so I guess we'll run with it, and if we have problems, we'll try the reset patch. Thanks, Joel Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Joel, > >> I had been planning to recommend the use of the QuickCam

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] Recommended, best supported/least buggy camera

2007-04-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Joel, > I had been planning to recommend the use of the QuickCam Fusion camera, > but I see on this mailing list that some bugs may exist with the > hardware. Are there any particular models that are most likely to work > without problems? Any that I should particularly avoid? Unfortunately,

[Linux-uvc-devel] Recommended, best supported/least buggy camera

2007-04-05 Thread Joel Ebel
I had been planning to recommend the use of the QuickCam Fusion camera, but I see on this mailing list that some bugs may exist with the hardware. Are there any particular models that are most likely to work without problems? Any that I should particularly avoid? Thanks, Joel Ebel ___