Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-08-03 Thread Michal Kazior
On 29 July 2016 at 17:09, Ben Greear wrote: > On 07/29/2016 07:52 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: [...] >> Yeah, I am aware of the fact that the firmware may do internal resets >> from time to time. The interesting question (and one for which I do not >> know the answer) is

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-29 Thread Sebastian Gottschall
if these sourcecodes would be just up to date with the binaries provided by qca. but qca doesnt seem to care that much about it. this is mainly also the reason why there are soo many long term stability issues with no resolution Am 29.07.2016 um 17:09 schrieb Ben Greear: On 07/29/2016 07:52

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-29 Thread Ben Greear
On 07/29/2016 07:52 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 10:26 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: On 07/27/2016 01:33 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: Unfortunately ath10k does not generally allow modifying the coverage class with the stock firmware and Qualcomm has so far refused to implement this

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-29 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 10:26 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > On 07/27/2016 01:33 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > > > Unfortunately ath10k does not generally allow modifying the coverage class > > with the stock firmware and Qualcomm has so far refused to implement this > > feature so that it can be

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-27 Thread Ben Greear
On 07/27/2016 01:33 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: Unfortunately ath10k does not generally allow modifying the coverage class with the stock firmware and Qualcomm has so far refused to implement this feature so that it can be properly supported in ath10k. If we however know the registers that need to

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-27 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi, [auto build test ERROR on ath6kl/ath-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20160727] [cannot apply to v4.7] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-27 Thread Michal Kazior
On 27 July 2016 at 10:33, Benjamin Berg wrote: > Unfortunately ath10k does not generally allow modifying the coverage class > with the stock firmware and Qualcomm has so far refused to implement this > feature so that it can be properly supported in ath10k. If we

[PATCH] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class

2016-07-27 Thread Benjamin Berg
Unfortunately ath10k does not generally allow modifying the coverage class with the stock firmware and Qualcomm has so far refused to implement this feature so that it can be properly supported in ath10k. If we however know the registers that need to be modified for proper operation with a higher