Arend van Spriel writes:
> On 10/14/2015 01:01 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arend van Spriel writes:
>>
>>> On 10/12/2015 10:59 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>
Arend, are the kbuild errors valid? I would guess they are as
wireless-drivers-next should be
Arend van Spriel writes:
> On 10/12/2015 10:59 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> kbuild test robot writes:
>>
>>> Hi Arend,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on next-20151008 -- if it's inappropriate base,
>>> please ignore]
>>>
>>> config: x86_64-randconfig-x011-201540
On 10/14/2015 01:01 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Arend van Spriel writes:
On 10/12/2015 10:59 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
kbuild test robot writes:
Hi Arend,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20151008 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
ignore]
config:
kbuild test robot writes:
> Hi Arend,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on next-20151008 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
> ignore]
>
> config: x86_64-randconfig-x011-201540 (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make
On 10/12/2015 10:59 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
kbuild test robot writes:
Hi Arend,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20151008 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
ignore]
config: x86_64-randconfig-x011-201540 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to
Hi Arend,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20151008 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
ignore]
config: x86_64-randconfig-x011-201540 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
Upon PSM watchdog event received from firmware the driver will obtain
a memory snapshot of the device and expose it to user-space through
the devcoredump framework. This will trigger a uevent.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Franky (Zhenhui) Lin