On 12-5-2017 21:21, Steve deRosier wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/11/2017 04:38 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>
[snip]
>>> o I don't know about other countries, but in Finland applying for any
>>> type of license (even if just to a license to
On 05/12/2017 12:21 PM, Steve deRosier wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 05/11/2017 04:38 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Simon Wunderlich writes:
it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too
many
more opinions ... do you think we can h
Hi Ben,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>
> On 05/11/2017 04:38 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Simon Wunderlich writes:
>>
>>> it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too
>>> many
>>> more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what
On 05/11/2017 04:38 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Simon Wunderlich writes:
it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
discussed here?
Well, there was an excellent reply from Steve and quit
Simon Wunderlich writes:
> it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
> more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
> discussed here?
Well, there was an excellent reply from Steve and quite a few "in my
opinion this is safe" typ
On 05/10/2017 03:30 AM, Tom Psyborg wrote:
On 9 May 2017 at 19:50, Adrian Chadd mailto:adr...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
(Note note: some of those channels have non-megahertz boundaries,
which means ... yeah, hello inter-operability boundaries. Hilarious.)
-adrian
From what I can
On 9 May 2017 at 05:57, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> Hey Kalle,
>
> it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
> more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
> discussed here?
(Note: FreeBSD has had in-tree support for 4.9GHz and 900MH
Hey Kalle,
it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
discussed here?
I'd be happy to rebase the remaining patches if that is necessary.
Thank you!
Simon
On Friday, April 21, 201
Hi all,
as one of the parties who triggered this patch to be included into the
main line kernel, we do support Simon's or Ben's point of view.
Safeguards against accidental misuse are in place. Various patches are
(have been) already in the open, so if someone wants to be evil, it
can't be p
Hi,
On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:09:59 AM CEST Ben Greear wrote:
> [...]
> > In my personal view, we have quite a few obstacles which I consider
> > "enough", but would be interesting to hear others opinions ...
> >
> > I'll throw in my 2-cents. This patch is treading on very dangerous g
On 04/18/2017 09:33 AM, Steve deRosier wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Simon Wunderlich mailto:s...@simonwunderlich.de>> wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:36:54 PM CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> Simon Wunderlich mailto:s...@simonwunderlich.de>> wrote:
> > From: Ben
Hi,
(sorry, resending due to my not noticing that gmail had changed my
default compose mode to HTML. Why does it randomly do that
sometimes?!?!)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Simon Wunderlich
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:36:54 PM CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Simon Wunderlich
Hi,
On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:36:54 PM CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > From: Ben Greear
> >
> > Many chips support channels in licensed bands. Add support for those,
> > along with a corresponding kernel config option to disable them by
> > default. Note that these chann
Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Ben Greear
>
> Many chips support channels in licensed bands. Add support for those,
> along with a corresponding kernel config option to disable them by
> default. Note that these channels are not selectable even if the
> option has been compiled unless the user
14 matches
Mail list logo