On 12-10-16 16:26, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arend van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 07-10-16 16:33, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arend van Spriel
wrote:
> On 07-10-16 16:33, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>> On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12
On 07-10-16 16:33, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>> On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52
On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
wrote:
>
>
> On 29-09-16
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27,
On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
> What is the decision triggering
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
What is the decision triggering the exit from the PS mode immediately
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
wrote:
>
>
> On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> What is the decision triggering the exit from the PS mode immediately
>>> after the
On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> What is the decision triggering the exit from the PS mode immediately
>> after the ping request? I am asking this because 802.11 PS legacy
>> specifies that the client should wait
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
> What is the decision triggering the exit from the PS mode immediately
> after the ping request? I am asking this because 802.11 PS legacy
> specifies that the client should wait for a beacon with TIM set in
> order to
13 matches
Mail list logo