On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 16:54 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> El Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:29:20PM -0700 Joe Perches ha dit:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:21 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > The macro results are assigned to u8 variables/fields. Adding the cast
> > > fixes plenty
Hi Joe,
El Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:29:20PM -0700 Joe Perches ha dit:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:21 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > The macro results are assigned to u8 variables/fields. Adding the cast
> > fixes plenty of clang warnings about "implicit conversion from 'int' to
> > 'u8'".
> >
When clang detects a non-boolean constant in a logical operation it
generates a 'constant-logical-operand' warning. In
ieee80211_try_rate_control_ops_get() the result of strlen()
is used in a logical operation, clang resolves the expression to an
(integer) constant at compile time when clang's
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 15:42 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> Thanks, it would also require to move the initialization of
> ieee80211_default_rc_algo into an ifdef. If you can live with such a
> solution I'm happy to change it.
I think that'd be something I can live with, yeah.
> > git
El Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:12:25PM +0200 Johannes Berg ha dit:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 12:24 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> > I agree that the code looks worse :( I hoped to find a fix using a
> > preprocessor condition but wasn't successful.
>
> It's actually easy - just remove the
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:21 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> The macro results are assigned to u8 variables/fields. Adding the cast
> fixes plenty of clang warnings about "implicit conversion from 'int' to
> 'u8'".
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
> ---
>
The macro results are assigned to u8 variables/fields. Adding the cast
fixes plenty of clang warnings about "implicit conversion from 'int' to
'u8'".
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 12:24 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> I agree that the code looks worse :( I hoped to find a fix using a
> preprocessor condition but wasn't successful.
It's actually easy - just remove the 'default ""' from Kconfig, and
then the symbol won't be defined at all if it
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
In mp mode, the wifi will not turn off and still has control of the PTA,
so the driver needs to distinguish whether it is mp mode or not
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
For scan notify, we need to supervise some registers to make sure that
coexistence is operating as we expected.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
When power on, the wifi could be initiating, force the antenna to
transmit bt packets to avoid bt unstable problems
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
These bt information are displayed in display coex
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc: Shaofu
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Clear the hid_exist flag by monitoring the packet counter.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc:
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Before firmware is ready, set GNT_BT to high to let bt transmit
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc:
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
If we don't limit the rx aggregation size, and set tdma instead, the bt profile
can
get more stable.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc:
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc: Shaofu
Cc: Steven Ting
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Let bt control the aggregation size to improve stability.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc: Shaofu
This set of patches completes the updates for btcoex for the RTL8723BE
device. These patches follow the 13-patch set previously submitted.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Pkshih
Cc: Birming Chiu
Cc: Shaofu
Cc: Steven Ting
Hi Johannes,
thanks for your comments
El Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:11:18PM +0200 Johannes Berg ha dit:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 11:56 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Clang raises a warning about the expression 'strlen(CONFIG_XXX)'
> > being
> > used in a logical operation. Clangs' builtin
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 11:56 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Clang raises a warning about the expression 'strlen(CONFIG_XXX)'
> being
> used in a logical operation. Clangs' builtin strlen function resolves
> the
> expression to a constant at compile time, which causes clang to
> generate
> a
Clang raises a warning about the expression 'strlen(CONFIG_XXX)' being
used in a logical operation. Clangs' builtin strlen function resolves the
expression to a constant at compile time, which causes clang to generate
a 'constant-logical-operand' warning.
Split the if statement in two to avoid
On 04/06/2017 02:32 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/06/2017 04:49 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06-04-17 11:04, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Good thank you. So what is the plan with the github version ?
Note that my submission contains a
On 04/06/2017 04:49 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06-04-17 11:04, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Good thank you. So what is the plan with the github version ?
Note that my submission contains a few small fixes on top of
the github version,
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> * use unaligned.h, not unaligned/access_ok.h
... which got misspelled in that patch, sorry... Fixed variant follows:
commit b3e79ba1708c9b74781079c9f8617448fce36b51
Author: Al Viro
Date: Thu Apr 6 12:42:14
* use unaligned.h, not unaligned/access_ok.h
* if a local variable of type uint16_t is unaligned, your compiler is FUBAR
* the whole point of get_unaligned_... is to avoid memcpy + ..._to_cpu().
Using it *after* memcpy() (into aligned object, no less) is pointless.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 07:02:15AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Brian Norris writes:
>
> > nl80211 provides the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_RANDOM_ADDR for every scan
> > request that should be randomized; the absence of such a flag means we
> > should not randomize. However,
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 11:38 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> +
>> +if (thr && thr < STA_SLOW_THRESHOLD * sta->local->num_sta) {
>> +sta->cparams.target = MS2TIME(50);
>> +sta->cparams.interval = MS2TIME(300);
>>
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 16:27 +0200, Thomas Thielemann wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> If the sequence is the following:
>
> 1. Prepare and execute NL80211_CMD_TRIGGER_SCAN
> 2. Prepare and execute NL80211_CMD_GET_SCAN
> Together with NL80211_CMD_GET_SCAN a callback is registered.
> In the callback the
Thanks!
If the sequence is the following:
1. Prepare and execute NL80211_CMD_TRIGGER_SCAN
2. Prepare and execute NL80211_CMD_GET_SCAN
Together with NL80211_CMD_GET_SCAN a callback is registered.
In the callback the raw data are parsed as BSS. The IE's are parsed to.
When do I have to fetch
The fwsignal module is part of the bcdc protocol and as such does
its instance data is not needed in core structure. Moving it into
struct brcmf_bcdc instead.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts
Checking whether the address of an array element is null is bogus
so removing it.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel
When brcmf_fws_add_interface() is called the struct brcmf_if::fws_desc
field is initialized regardless the state of the fwsignal functionality,
ie. the fcmode. This is not needed when fcmode is NONE, which is the
default mode.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by:
This series is intended for 4.12 including:
* rework for fwsignal module.
* tighten length checks for scheduled scan result event.
* fix duplicate entries in scan request for scheduled scan.
The patches apply to the master branch of the wireless-drivers-next
repository.
Arend van Spriel (6):
This is a non-functional change to align the fwsignal module to
the naming pattern used throughout the driver.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin
Assure the event data buffer is long enough to hold the array
of netinfo items and that SSID length does not exceed the maximum
of 32 characters as per 802.11 spec.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts
When receiving pno results there may be duplicate channels and/or
ssids. Assure each is added only once when preparing the internal
escan request.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts
Reviewed-by: Franky
Hi,
I noticed your patch-series on the lwn.net kernel page,
and I took a peek :)
I don't think that this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux-next.git/commit/?h=20170329-driver-data-v2-try3=3968dd3031d1ff7e7be4acfb810948c70c2d4490
Is a good idea, specifically
Add the Dell Wireless 1601 card as an AR9462 in the ath9k pci list.
Note that the wowlan feature is supported and has been tested
successfully.
Signed-off-by: Damien Thébault
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 11:38 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> +
> + if (thr && thr < STA_SLOW_THRESHOLD * sta->local->num_sta) {
> + sta->cparams.target = MS2TIME(50);
> + sta->cparams.interval = MS2TIME(300);
> + sta->cparams.ecn = false;
> + }
Hi,
On 06-04-17 11:04, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Good thank you. So what is the plan with the github version ?
Note that my submission contains a few small fixes on top of
the github version, for which I intended to submit a pull-req
but
CoDel can be too aggressive if a station sends at a very low rate,
leading reduced throughput. This gets worse the more stations are
present, as each station gets more bursty the longer the round-robin
scheduling between stations takes.
This adds dynamic adjustment of CoDel parameters per
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Good thank you. So what is the plan with the github version ?
>
> Note that my submission contains a few small fixes on top of
> the github version, for which I intended to submit a pull-req
> but I've not gotten around to that yet,
Hi Toke,
[auto build test WARNING on mac80211/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc5 next-20170406]
[cannot apply to mac80211-next/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits
Hi Kalle,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kv...@codeaurora.org]
> Sent: 2017年4月5日 18:47
> To: Xinming Hu
> Cc: Linux Wireless; Kalle Valo; Brian Norris; Dmitry Torokhov;
> raja...@google.com; Amitkumar Karwar; Cathy Luo; Xinming Hu
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [3/3] mwifiex: pcie:
Hi Brain,
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannor...@chromium.org]
> Sent: 2017年4月4日 2:49
> To: Dmitry Torokhov
> Cc: Xinming Hu; Linux Wireless; Kalle Valo; Rajat Jain; Amitkumar Karwar;
> Cathy
> Luo; Xinming Hu
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 3/3] mwifiex: pcie: avoid
Hi Dmitry,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:d...@google.com]
> Sent: 2017年4月1日 6:50
> To: Xinming Hu
> Cc: Linux Wireless; Kalle Valo; Brian Norris; Rajat Jain; Amitkumar Karwar;
> Cathy Luo; Xinming Hu
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 3/3] mwifiex: pcie: avoid hardcode
Hi Toke,
[auto build test ERROR on mac80211/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc5 next-20170406]
[cannot apply to mac80211-next/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Toke
Hi,
On 05-04-17 18:32, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/05/2017 04:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05-04-17 01:41, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/04/2017 04:53 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 04/04/2017 11:38 PM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
On 4-4-2017 20:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 04/04/2017
49 matches
Mail list logo