On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 13:03 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 11:27 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
Dynamic power save
Hi,
We are testing SMPS functionality for AP mode. The driver conveys its
capabilities through setting the HT capability which can be set to 0-3.
I wanted to convey support for both Dynamic and Static Powersave
and then control the config through hostapd.conf file. Currently this is
not
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Eliad Peller el...@wizery.com wrote:
hi,
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
We are testing SMPS functionality for AP mode. The driver conveys its
capabilities through setting the HT capability which can be set
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach egrumb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach egrumb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Laurențiu Nicola
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach egrumb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Emmanuel
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2014-10-21 10:23, Laurențiu Nicola wrote:
It's an ASUS RT-N66U running NEWD-2/K3X from r24160.
This is a Broadcom based device, so it should behave in the same way as
other APs/Routers running the Broadcom drivers.
The
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach egrumb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2014-10-21 10:23, Laurențiu Nicola wrote:
It's an ASUS RT
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Kamran Nishat kamran.nis...@gmail.com wrote:
But for this channel conditions should be changing at the scale of 100
micro secs consistently.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's not completely unsurprising - the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach
emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com wrote:
From: Andrei Otcheretianski andrei.otcheretian...@intel.com
Deliver up to 128 frames during SP instead of 8 if unlimited max SP
is specified during association.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski
looks like some certification tests expect more frames to be delivered during
SP.
128 is still kind of arbitrary value
-Original Message-
From: Krishna Chaitanya [mailto:chaitanya.m...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 11:03
To: Grumbach, Emmanuel
Cc: Johannes Berg
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Otcheretianski, Andrei
andrei.otcheretian...@intel.com wrote:
The spec doesn't require unlimited to be really unlimited and the AP
decides when to end the SP, so any value here
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Brent Taylor moto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Brent Taylor moto...@gmail.com wrote:
Resending in plain text mode...
Hi Kalle,
I have a custom built board with an AR6003 WiFi chip running
linux-3.10.40 and hostapd 2.2 that
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Brent Taylor moto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Brent Taylor moto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Brent Taylor moto...@gmail.com
Hi Johannes,
The BW tracking feature in mac80211 is causing connection problems and
operating mode/bw problems when switching b/w modes and bw's in AP.
For Eg. Initially if AP is operating in VHT-80MHz, and then we changed
in to HT-40MHz, mac80211 cannot handle it because the VHT capability
is
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Johannes,
The BW tracking feature in mac80211 is causing connection problems and
operating mode/bw problems when switching b/w modes and bw's in AP.
For Eg. Initially if AP is operating in VHT-80MHz
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 02:41 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 02:03 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
Use
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Stefano Cappa
stefano.ca...@mail.polimi.it wrote:
Hi
I prefer a generic version, without specific things, like this one:
h**p://postimg.org/image/hfkpjt3ux/ created by Johannes Berg.
A while ago, i have written about the generic linux wireless
architecture for
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 13:21 +0800, miaoq...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
From: Miaoqing Pan miaoq...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan miaoq...@qca.qualcomm.com
Since you give no commit log, I can only
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 12:48 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
Some APs experience problems when working with
U-APSD. Decreasing the probability of that
happening by using legacy mode for all ACs but VO
isn't enough.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Michal Kazior michal.kaz...@tieto.com wrote:
On 3 March 2015 at 11:15, Krishna Chaitanya chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
wrote:
Cisco 4410N originally forced us to enable VO by
default
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Cisco 4410N originally forced us to enable VO by
default only because it treated non-VO ACs as
legacy.
Mixed mode (uapsd + legacy) is not really the optimal
configuration, where we expect STA to send trigger
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Johannes,
The BW tracking feature in mac80211 is causing connection problems and
operating mode/bw problems when switching
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 02:03 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
Use case2: When changing from HT40-VHT80, the connection goes through
but it still connected as HT40 (vht_ie from cfg80211 is returned
null).
Can you
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:58 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
STA (mac80211) connects to AP in VHT-80.
AP is reconfigured to 11n40
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 02:58 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
Before that i have a basic question? Should we reset our tracking after
the connection is lost, in my case above the connection was lost (Config
change
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:58 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
STA (mac80211) connects to AP in VHT-80.
AP is reconfigured to 11n40 (stops beaconing for about 30secs and then
starts again).
STA loses connection
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Stefano Cappa
stefano.ca...@mail.polimi.it wrote:
Hi, i've two question about iw
1) It's possibile that iw phy phy0 info said that i can use a particular
combination of interfaces in Valid interface combinations but on my device
i can't use this
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 06:29:38PM +, Peer, Ilan wrote:
According to the 802.11ac amendment: The IEEE 802.11 VHT STA operates in
frequency bands below 6 GHz excluding the 2.4 GHz band, so at least the
spec. is clear about
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 13:53 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
I'm not sure I get it - we always transmit a frame after resume.
Let me explain the sequence of events:
tx_frame:
dynamic_ps_disable_work
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alexis Green agr...@cococorp.com wrote:
You should build mac80211 as module instead of built-in driver and
make modules instead of full make. This way you'll be just
rebuilding mac80211.ko instead of the whole thing.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Duy Tai
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Chaitanya T K chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chaitanya Tata chaitanya.m...@gmail.com
In case of Dynamic SMPS enable RTS/CTS for all rates.
In case of Static SMPS mark the Nss 1 rates as not supported.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya T K
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 03:03 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
This patch is *ancient*, before we actually used patchwork properly ...
Ok, so you want me to send a V2 with the indentation fixed?
(or) shall i wait
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 03:02 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
This isn't what your patch is actually doing though. You need to mention
WoWLAN at the very least in your commit log;
Yes, WoWLAN is enabled in our
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Peer, Ilan ilan.p...@intel.com wrote:
I suspect this is because of P2P_GO NoA?
Who should care about this direct probes tx when GO is not present?
In case we didn't send direct probes - there is no problem and TC
works correctly
Interesting :)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Janusz Dziedzic
janusz.dzied...@tieto.com wrote:
In case we will get ROC abort we should not call
ieee80211_remain_on_channel_expired().
In other case I hit such warning on MIPS and
p2p negotiation failed (tested with use_chanctx=1).
ath: phy0: Starting RoC
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Michal Kazior michal.kaz...@tieto.com wrote:
On 22 June 2015 at 13:56, Krishna Chaitanya chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Janusz Dziedzic
janusz.dzied...@tieto.com wrote:
In case we will get ROC abort we should not call
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Peer, Ilan ilan.p...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-wireless-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Janusz Dziedzic
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 11:51
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 17:05 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
Then again, you're talking about WoWLAN, but then ...
In wowlan, we simply call drv_resume and only if it fails
then we will go through full resume
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 15:52 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
I still don't like it. I also don't believe that what you're writing is
actually true. The only problem I can see is that it leads to higher
power
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 02:34 +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
In case of Dynamic SMPS enable RTS/CTS for all rates.
Applied. I really think you should drop the . at the end of the
subject though :)
Oh..will drop it. Is
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 19:12 +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
From: Chaitanya T K chaitanya.m...@gmail.com
Background: When wowlan is enabled, the chipset stays in low
power state maintaining the connection as per the
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 06/11/2015 11:03 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
On 12 June 2015 at 01:38, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 06/11/2015 02:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
In my ath10k CT firmware, I am disabling the beacon-miss
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 12:27 +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
+ if (sta-smps_mode == IEEE80211_SMPS_DYNAMIC
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the Regulatory and DFS wiki it is mentioned that
beacon hints are not processed for DFS channels.
But i could not find the related piece of code which
does this.
So in DFS channels can we process
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 22:44 +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
From: Chaitanya T K chaitanya.m...@gmail.com
If suspended during TX in progress, there can be
race where the driver is put of of power-save due
to TX and
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 15:31 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
In our case the data size is 411KB, and each message carries around 3072
bytes, so total messages would be 138. The first message we get, we
retrieve
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Arend van Spriel aspr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31-05-15 01:28, Chaitanya T K wrote:
cfg80211 reuses the skb before asking for a fresh on from genl framework,
this works efficiently for smaller messages but NLM_F_DUMP is normally
used to transport larger data
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Chaitanya T K chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chaitanya T K chaitanya.m...@gmail.com
If we receive suspend after TX path has executed
dynamic ps disable work, the driver will be in
ACTIVE state during suspend and even after it
resumes.
As before
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 04:58 +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
cfg80211 reuses the skb before asking for a fresh on from genl framework,
this works efficiently for smaller messages but NLM_F_DUMP is normally
used to
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 16:47 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
Note # of messages as you say is actually irrelevant - you should look
Well with 138 messages the function and each message 3072 bytes
calls b/w
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 23:49 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
I just check the mac80211/cfg80211 code, and I am not sure this
direct probe could work correctly.
Function ieee80211_rx_mgmt_probe_resp() is interesting.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 14:32 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
We have also found another issue with direct probe.
Some of the AP's are not setting sequence number in the probe
responses
so in case of a retry
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:44 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
The issue above can probably easily fixed by doing the BSS update
after
the direct probe responded though, no? Like this:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 17:20 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Johannes Berg
johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:44 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
The issue
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
chaitanya.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are having trouble making the uapsd working in p2p client case. Is
this broken? or is there a way to configure the uapsd for p2p client
case?
case a) p2p client with p2p_no_group_iface=1
When trying
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach
emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
index c8ba2e7..a758eb84 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
@@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ static void
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Grumbach, Emmanuel
emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com wrote:
On 07/28/2015 02:35 PM, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach
emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c index
Hi,
>From the documentation:(mac80211.h) For the ieee80211_ops
(un)assign_vif_chanctx, there is no mention of explicit sleep
requirements (allowed/disallwoed) for the callback.
>From a quick glance at the code calling the OP, looks like we can
sleep (mutexes are used). So how should we handle
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Johannes Berg
<johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 12:16 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From the documentation:(mac80211.h) For the ieee80211_ops
>> (un)assign_vif_chanctx, there is no mention
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Chaitanya T K wrote:
> From: tkc
>
> Before the tx_status is received for the action frame, if we
> get another request, we respond to that by freeing the memory
> for pending_action_tx, but we don't cancel the
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach
wrote:
>
> From: Eyal Shapira
>
> An AP can send an operating channel width change in a beacon
> opmode notification IE as long as there's a change in the nss as
> well (See 802.11ac-2013 section
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:17 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>
>> > If the rate control algorithm doesn't look at sta->sta.rx_nss then
>> > that's their bug.
>>
&g
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach
wrote:
> index 7a76ce6..f4a5287 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/ht.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/ht.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,11 @@ bool ieee80211_ht_cap_ie_to_sta_ht_cap(struct
> ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> /* set Rx
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:25 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.
>> net> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:08 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>
>> > void ieee80211_vht_handle_opmode(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data
>> > *sdata,
>> >
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Grumbach, Emmanuel
<emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/08/2015 09:11 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2015 12:37 AM, "Grumbach, Emmanuel"
>> <emmanuel.grumb...@i
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:59 PM, David Mosberger wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 01/07/2016 08:19 AM, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>
> >> We are seeing a curious issue where WLAN connectivity sometimes
> >> gets
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:17 PM, David Mosberger <dav...@egauge.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
> <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Management frames use a different queue (VO)
>> from the logs it looks like a data path
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:40:28PM +0530, Chaitanya T K wrote:
> > From: tkc
> >
> > Before the tx_status is received for the action frame, if we
> > get another request, we respond to that by
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using kernel 4.1 with option CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB
> enabled. I have set one country in db.txt which during startup I set
> via 'iw reg set XX'. When connected to some AP which sends country
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Belisko Marek <marek.beli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Krishna,
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
> <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Belisko Marek <marek.beli...@gm
Hi,
What is the background for disabling STBC and LDPC for
VHT rates? The below comment is cryptic :-).
/* TODO tx_flags for vht - ATM the RC API is not fine-grained enough */
Can we just enable these now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Chaitanya TK
> wrote:
>>
>> From: Chaitanya T K
>>
>> If peer support reception of STBC and LDPC, enable them for better
>>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Karl Beldan <karl.bel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Chaitanya TK <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
> <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Karl Beldan <karl.bel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>&
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> Requires software tx queueing support. frag_list support (for zero-copy)
>> is optional.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Krishna Chaitanya
> <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>&g
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Felix Fietkau <n...@openwrt.org> wrote:
> On 2016-02-08 10:54, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Felix Fietkau <
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
>> On 4 February 2016 at 12:49, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>&
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
> On 4 February 2016 at 12:22, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to run some iperf tests using mac80211_hwsim b/w AP and STA.
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
> On 4 February 2016 at 12:49, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com>
>> wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:32 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>
>> ip netns add ns1
>> ip netns exec ns1 bash # get the PID in the session and don't close
>> it
>> iw phy phyX set netns $pid_of_that_shell
>>
>
> If
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 17:58 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.
>> net> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-02-04
Hi All,
I am trying to run some iperf tests using mac80211_hwsim b/w AP and STA.
Even after tweaking the routing table, the packets are still not going through
mac80211_hwsim instead they are just looping back.
After a quick search i found that we should use different network namespaces.
Can
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
> On 4 February 2016 at 13:46, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
>> <chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>&g
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Avery Pennarun wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Johannes Berg
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 16:28 -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> >> Changing default_agg_timeout to zero (as it is on most non-ath9k
>
Hi,
When using HW_PS and running Downlink only traffic like UDP-RX, mac80211
has the mechanism to not to enter power-save (postpone the dynamic ps
timer).
But if we are already in power-save it continues to stay in PS
and retrieves the frames, for large traffic this is not acceptable.
The
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 18:31 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When using HW_PS and running Downlink only traffic like UDP-RX,
>> mac80211 has the mechanism to
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 17:51 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> > What is the recommended method for adding
> > debug prints in mac80211 based drivers.
> >
> > 1) -DDEBUG + pr_debug =
Hi,
What is the recommended method for adding
debug prints in mac80211 based drivers.
1) -DDEBUG + pr_debug ==> used by mac80211, brcm80211
2) -DDEBUG + dev_dbg ==> zd1201
3) dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) ==> used by iwlwifi
4) printk(KERN_DEBUG) ==> Just to complete the list.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Radu P writes:
>
> > iw list|grep -i VHT <- still nothing
>
> Maybe your iw is too old? I didn't see anything either (using stock iw
> from Ubuntu 14.04) but then I upgraded to the latest one from git
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Valo, Kalle <kv...@qca.qualcomm.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Johannes Berg <johan
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Jouni Malinen <j...@w1.fi> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:13:46PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> > On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 13:11 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 02:32 +0530, Krishn
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 02:32 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 20
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 13:11 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Joe Pe
Hi,
With the current design, occasionally we are seeing issues
where minstrel sends 3x3 rates for our 2x2 chip.
IMHO, couple of things can cause this
1) update_caps doesn't take local HW capabilities in to account
2) While calculating sample_idx, we use MCS_GROUP_RATES
which can cause a
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> There is, btw, perhaps a different way - just fix the damn stuff.
>
> Requires moving everything into ifmgd rather than local, and then
> perhaps if only a single managed interface exists mirroring its state
> into
Hi,
When the HW is in PS and Dynamic PS is enabled we are dropping
all the offchannel frames. Sequence is as below
if hw is in PS: stop_queues reason=PS, queue dynamic_ps_disable_work
send Offchannel mgmt_tx
drop the packet because offchanel + stop_reasons[q] !=0
How should we handle this? SW
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 18:23 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo