On 2014-10-20 10:15, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> The "goto chip_reset" is a bit misleading, because it does not actually
>> issue a chip reset. Instead it is bypassing processing of other
>> interrupts and assumes that the tasklet will issue a chip reset.
>
> Well, we kill in
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> The "goto chip_reset" is a bit misleading, because it does not actually
> issue a chip reset. Instead it is bypassing processing of other
> interrupts and assumes that the tasklet will issue a chip reset.
Well, we kill interrupts and the tasklet sets ATH_OP_HW_RESET,
so no m
The "goto chip_reset" is a bit misleading, because it does not actually
issue a chip reset. Instead it is bypassing processing of other
interrupts and assumes that the tasklet will issue a chip reset.
In the case of RXORN this does not happen, so bypassing processing of
other interrupts will simpl
