On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:49:45AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:28 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > The recent commit that moved around TX handlers dropped the sequence
> > number allocation at the end of ieee80211_tx_dequeue and calls
> > ieee80211_tx_h_sequence instead (f
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:28 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> The recent commit that moved around TX handlers dropped the sequence
> number allocation at the end of ieee80211_tx_dequeue and calls
> ieee80211_tx_h_sequence instead (for the non-fast-xmit case).
> However, it did not change the fast-xmit
Felix Fietkau writes:
> The recent commit that moved around TX handlers dropped the sequence
> number allocation at the end of ieee80211_tx_dequeue and calls
> ieee80211_tx_h_sequence instead (for the non-fast-xmit case).
> However, it did not change the fast-xmit sequence allocation condition
>
The recent commit that moved around TX handlers dropped the sequence
number allocation at the end of ieee80211_tx_dequeue and calls
ieee80211_tx_h_sequence instead (for the non-fast-xmit case).
However, it did not change the fast-xmit sequence allocation condition
in ieee80211_xmit_fast_finish, whi
