On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:55 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 15:44 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Even though there is apparently something wrong with this part of the
> > ACPI table on you laptop, since it doesn't match our specifications.
> > In any case, it's mostly harmless.
>
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 08:56 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> > On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> > ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
>
>
> Tested-by: Chris Rorvick
>
> I
Hi Luca,
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Chris Rorvick
I think the debug output looks as expected, see below for the first 20
lines or
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 15:44 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Even though there is apparently something wrong with this part of the
> ACPI table on you laptop, since it doesn't match our specifications.
> In any case, it's mostly harmless.
Would a correct implementation by Dell have any benefits for t
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:36 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:30 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > I forgot to say... could you load the iwlwifi module with debug=0x01
> > (module parameter), so we can see the messages the driver is printing
> > when it doesn't find a proper structure
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:30 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> I forgot to say... could you load the iwlwifi module with debug=0x01
> (module parameter), so we can see the messages the driver is printing
> when it doesn't find a proper structure?
That makes a lot of noise! Here's the first 100 lines or s
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Luca,
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> > ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
>
>
> Tested-by: Paul Bolle
>
> Not that this
Luca,
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Paul Bolle
Not that this test was worth a lot: it builds cleanly (on top of
4.8.1), the error at b