Re: [linux-yocto] Warning in compiling linux-yocto 5.10

2021-11-16 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 11/17/21 4:02 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:03 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:13 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 11/16/21 11:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Hi

Re: [linux-yocto] Warning in compiling linux-yocto 5.10

2021-11-15 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 11/16/21 11:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Hi Bruce, We encountered a warning when compiling linux-yocto 5.10 in WRlinux on our tester's server machine. After doing some search, I found yocto also encountered this some years ago.[https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/152442/] Maybe yocto

Re: [linux-yocto] Warning in compiling linux-yocto 5.10

2021-11-14 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 11/15/21 11:19 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:21 PM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, We encountered a warning when compiling linux-yocto 5.10 in WRlinux on our tester's server machine. After doing some search

[linux-yocto] Warning in compiling linux-yocto 5.10

2021-11-14 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, We encountered a warning when compiling linux-yocto 5.10 in WRlinux on our tester's server machine. After doing some search, I found yocto also encountered this some years ago.[https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/152442/] Maybe yocto also have this warning now? I can't figure

Re: [linux-yocto][v5.10/standard/base][PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ratelimit event dump

2021-10-21 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 10/21/21 9:41 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] In message: [linux-yocto][v5.10/standard/base][PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ratelimit event dump on 20/10/2021 Yanfei Xu wrote: From: Jean-Philippe Brucker When a device or driver

[linux-yocto][v5.10/standard/base][PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ratelimit event dump

2021-10-20 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker When a device or driver misbehaves, it is possible to receive DMA fault events much faster than we can print them out, causing a lock up of the system and inability to cancel the source of the problem. Ratelimit printing of events to help recovery. Tested-by: Aaro

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: use raw_spin_lock/unlock for accessing callback_lock

2021-09-29 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/29/21 8:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:31 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/28/21 9:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] I had done the same fix last

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: use raw_spin_lock/unlock for accessing callback_lock

2021-09-29 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/28/21 9:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] I had done the same fix last Tuesday for 5.14, and hadn't gotten around to cherry picking it yet:

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: use raw_spin_lock/unlock for accessing callback_lock

2021-09-28 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Since the commit a653b0f0ab79 ("cpuset: Convert callback_lock to raw_spinlock_t") has changed the lock type of callbak_lock to raw_spinlock_t, we should use raw_spin_lock/unlock funciton for accessing it. Fixes: 10dfcfda5c6f ("cgroup/cpuset: Fix violation of cpuset locking rule") Signed-off-by:

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/base][PATCH] OF: DT-Overlay configfs interface (v7)

2021-08-17 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Pantelis Antoniou commit ba900332d141bf2d1d3b6aa7da8f01fe4b9fb256 from https://github.com/altera-opensource/linux-socfpga.git Add a runtime interface to using configfs for generic device tree overlay usage. With it its possible to use device tree overlays without having to use a

Re: [linux-yocto] [meta-realtime][PATCH] meta-realtime: convert to new override syntax

2021-08-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 8/10/21 6:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: **[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] I already have the same automated conversion locally, but since I'm out of the office, I haven't pushed it yet. I see that I didn't push it to master-next, so I'll do that shortly.

[linux-yocto] [meta-realtime][PATCH] meta-realtime: convert to new override syntax

2021-08-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
This is the result of automated script conversion: scripts/contrib/convert-overrides.py converting the metadata to use ":" as the override character instead of "_". Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu --- recipes-tools/rt-app/rt-app.bb | 2 +- recipes-tools/schedtool-dl/schedtool-dl.bb | 2

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] aufs: fix compile failure when accessing rw_sem.owner in rt-kernel

2021-06-21 Thread Xu, Yanfei
rw_semaphore is implemented with rt-mutex in rt-kernel which is different from the standard kernel. Compatible with these two implementations on aufs by adding a "#ifndef" statement. The compile failure log as blow: | CC drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.o | CC kernel/task_work.o |

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] Revert "net/xfrm: fixup 5.10.30 -stable merge"

2021-06-16 Thread Xu, Yanfei
The commit b7a01a10d2f9 ("net: xfrm: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock") change the type of xfrm_state_hash_generation from "seqcount_t" to "seqcount_spinlock_t". Revert this commit for fixing compile failure of "incompatible pointer type". This reverts commit

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache yocto-5.4 yocto-5.10 master][PATCH] arm-versatile-926ejs: fix config check warning of CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

2021-03-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should be disabled when enable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE. They are mutually exclusive. This change can fix the following warning: WARNING: linux-yocto-5.10.19+gitAUTOINC+67e74d52f2_5b86278250-r0 do_kernel_configcheck: [kernel config]:

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/nxp-s32g2xx][PATCH] s32: flexcan: integrate two patches that fix the same bug

2021-02-01 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Commit:621e14659f37("can: flexcan: drop repetitive execution can_rx_offload_add_timestamp") and commit:3713ba3e41db("s32: flexcan: Remove duplicated code as part of kernel 5.4-rt initial merge") fix the same flexcan bug in different way, and both of them are contained in codes,

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/nxp-s32g2xx][PATCH] s32: flexcan: Remove unused function flexcan_mailbox_read()

2021-01-20 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu After the commit 83521390e("s32: flexcan: Remove duplicated code as part of kernel 5.4-rt initial merge"), the flexcan_mailbox_read() is not invoked anymore. To avoid the below compile-time warning, let's remove it. warning: 'flexcan_mailbox_read' defined but not

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] qemuppc: configure the CONFIG_SCSI to '=y'

2020-11-24 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Changing CONFIG_SCSI from '=m' to '=y' to be consistent with its direct dependency, which is 'CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y' in virtio.cfg. Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu --- bsp/qemu-ppc32/qemu-ppc32.cfg | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-28 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/9/20 12:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:23 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/8/20 10:26 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/8/20 10:01 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:43 AM

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-09 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/9/20 12:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:23 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/8/20 10:26 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/8/20 10:01 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:43 AM

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-08 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/8/20 10:26 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/8/20 10:01 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:43 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/7/20 7:53 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:56 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, When I excuted "make -C /usr/src/kernel sc

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-07 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/7/20 10:42 PM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 9/7/20 7:53 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:56 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, When I excuted "make -C /usr/src/kernel scripts prepare" on target mechine, I will be asked for choicing if to enable "GCC_PLU

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-07 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 9/7/20 7:53 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:56 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, When I excuted "make -C /usr/src/kernel scripts prepare" on target mechine, I will be asked for choicing if to enable "GCC_PLUGINS" and other configurations de

[linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-07 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, When I excuted "make -C /usr/src/kernel scripts prepare" on target mechine, I will be asked for choicing if to enable "GCC_PLUGINS" and other configurations depend on "GCC_PLUGINS" (The .config file doesn't contain 'GCC_PLUGINS is not set') But there were never be asked for these

[linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel][yocto-kernel-cache] [Discussion] How about disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS by default in ktypes/base/base.cfg

2020-09-07 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, When I excuted "make -C /usr/src/kernel scripts prepare" on target mechine, I will be asked for choicing if to enable "GCC_PLUGINS" and other configurations depend on "GCC_PLUGINS" (The .config file didn,t contain 'GCC_PLUGINS is not set') But there were never be asked for these

[linux-yocto][PATCH 1/1] Fix compiling warnings of file arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c

2020-06-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Jiping Ma arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c:107:6: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] if ((u32)tail + 4 >= buftail.fp) ^ arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c:110:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto-dev standard/base][PATCH 0/1]Fix compiling warnings of file arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c

2020-06-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Hi Bruce, This patch fix compiling warnings which are introduced by an previous patch. It should merge to both [linux-yocto-dev standard/base] and [linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base]

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-06 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Fang Jia This change is for arm64 platform compat mode. The change for arm32 platform has been included in this commit "perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled". This change replaces code designed for the obsolete ARM APCS ABI, which causes failures of the perf backtrace logic

[V2][linux-yocto][linux-yocto-dev standard/base][PATCH 0/1] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-06 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Hi Bruce, This patch should be merged to [linux-yocto-dev standard/base] and [linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base] V1-->V2 1.send this patch to linux-yocto and linux-yocto-dev instead of cache repo. Best regards, Yanfei Fang Jia (1): arm64/perf: fix backtrace

Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-05 Thread Xu, Yanfei
No, you didn't miss any things. I just know that the patches are generated from your scripts. And I will resend the patch against linux-yocto. Yanfei On 5/2/20 11:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Did I miss applying this to the kernel-cache previously ? or did I miss a patch against the

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-04-27 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu This change is for arm64 platform compat mode. --[cut here: not apply patch] Samples: 119K of event 'cycles' Event count (approx.): 114092698680 Children Self CommandShared Object Symbol . ..

[linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base] [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu:Update the power domain cells

2020-04-03 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Before the last commit, it updated the power-domain cells to 2. However, the last commit added some codes without right power-domain cells. So, update OSPI power domain cells to 2 here to avoid warning when compile dts. Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu ---

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-04-01 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 4/1/20 8:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:07 PM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, Not a build failure, but a compile warning. when I built v5.4/standard/xilinx-zynq kernel, It occured the blow warning in log.do_compile. # work-shared/xilinx-zynq/kernel-source/fs/yaffs2

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-03-31 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, Not a build failure, but a compile warning. when I built v5.4/standard/xilinx-zynq kernel, It occured the blow warning in log.do_compile. /# work-shared/xilinx-zynq/kernel-source/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c:1829:6: warning: unused variable 'i_version' //[-Wunused-variable]/ /# 1829 |

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-03-30 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu --- fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644 --- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c +++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c @@ -1826,7

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache yocto-5.4 master][PATCH] bsp/ti-am65x: remove duplicate config option CONFIG_NETDEVICES

2020-03-23 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu CONFIG_NETDEVICES is set twice, remove one of them. Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu --- bsp/ti-am65x/ti-am65x.cfg | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bsp/ti-am65x/ti-am65x.cfg b/bsp/ti-am65x/ti-am65x.cfg index ec680ebe..008d388b 100644 --- a/bsp/ti-am65x/ti-am65x.cfg

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache yocto-5.4 master][PATCH] bsp/ti-am335x: drop some invalid cfg options

2020-03-20 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu drop TI_DAVINCI_CPDMA option removed from v5.2 kernel https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/99f629718272974405e8d180d2fa70c03c06d61f drop SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP option removed from v5.0 kernel https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f2055e145f2975a75dace8e386fad9364828cdb4

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev standard/base][PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu:Update the power domain cells

2020-03-20 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 3/20/20 6:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:44 PM wrote: From: Yanfei Xu Before the last commit, it updated the power-domain cells to 2. However, the last commit added some codes without right power-domain cells. So, update OSPI power domain cells to 2 here to avoid

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master][PATCH] bsp/nxp-ls20xx: Enable CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL

2020-03-18 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu 1)CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL is a default configure items of arm64 defconfig. Reference: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944391/ 2)THERMAL_GOV_POWER_ALLOCATOR is set to y in nxp-ls20xx.cfg, but from v5.5 kernel, the THERMAL_GOV_POWER_ALLOCATOR depends on ENERGY_MODEL. So we enable

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 2/3] features/intel-pinctrl: remove CONFIG_GPIO_LYNXPOINT

2020-03-17 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, I find PINCTRL_LYNXPOINT is actually removed from v5.6 kernel. And v5.4 kernel is still using GPIO_LYNXPOINT. Would you please revert it on v5.4 kernel-cache? Reference: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/eb83479e18999e34b3b800f54aa31137f7f41c33 Thanks, Yanfei On 1/21/20

[linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache yocto-5.4 master][PATCH] bsp/intel-x86: remove invalid config item CRYPTO_AES_X86_64

2020-03-17 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Item CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_X86_64 has been dropped from v5.4 kernel, therefore, we drop it too. Reference: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1d2c3279311e4f03fcf164e1366f2fda9f4bfccf Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu --- bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg | 1 - 1 file changed, 1

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [v2][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/preempt-rt] aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner in RT kernel

2020-03-12 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, Would you please help merge this patch to preempt branch? This compile issue is a bit urgent. Thanks! Yanfei On 3/12/20 12:57 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: is From: Yanfei Xu Hi Bruce, v1--->v2 1. Add a if statement to separately operate the owner mem

[PATCH 0/1] [v2][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/preempt-rt] aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner in RT kernel

2020-03-11 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Hi Bruce, v1--->v2 1. Add a if statement to separately operate the owner member between standard and RT kernel. Also I have completed the smoke test about aufs before this email. Yanfei Xu (1): aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner in RT kernel

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner in RT kernel

2020-03-11 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Fix build failure. owner member is now made a permanent member of the rw_semaphore in v5.6 kernel(commitid:c71fd893f). But the rw_semaphore in RT kernel had been implemented with rt_mutex in rwsem-rt.h. Add if statment to distinguish the two cases. -Error

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/base v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86 v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi][PATCH] aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner at rt kernel

2020-03-11 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 3/11/20 12:14 PM, He Zhe wrote: On 3/10/20 2:50 PM, Xu, Yanfei wrote: From: Yanfei Xu Fix build failure. Even though owner member is now made a permanent member of the rw_semaphore. The rw_semaphore in rwsem-rt.h doesn't have owner field still. -Error messages

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/base v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86 v5.4/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi][PATCH] aufs5:fix:avoid to access rw_sem.owner at rt kernel

2020-03-10 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu Fix build failure. Even though owner member is now made a permanent member of the rw_semaphore. The rw_semaphore in rwsem-rt.h doesn't have owner field still. -Error messages- |

Re: [linux-yocto] temp: mips: undo vdso reverts

2020-03-04 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Thanks for your imformation. I have tested it that apply this commit to linux-yocto-dev and it works well. Will you apply it to linux-yocto-dev too? Regards, //Yanfei On 3/4/20 12:01 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:30 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: OK! So If I understand correctly

Re: [linux-yocto] temp: mips: undo vdso reverts

2020-03-03 Thread Xu, Yanfei
OK! So If I understand correctly, this failure will disappear after you bring the Makefile patch to linux-yocto recently? Regards, Yanfei On 3/3/20 10:09 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:44 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: Hi Bruce, Do you still remember this issue about vDSO

Re: [linux-yocto] temp: mips: undo vdso reverts

2020-03-03 Thread Xu, Yanfei
Hi Bruce, Do you still remember this issue about vDSO of mips boot failure.The linux-yocto-dev still have this problem, even though the mips kernel have some fixes after that. Any new progress in it? Regards, Yanfei On 3/3/20 5:28 PM, He Zhe wrote: FYI Forwarded Message

[V2][linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2][PATCH] features: avoid enabling edac for most of mips boards

2019-12-06 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu When some layer include the edac feature and bitbake kernel ARCH =mips, that will cause some warning masseges. CONFIG_EDAC and CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG depend on CONFIG_EDAC_SUPPORT, but CONFIG_EDAC_SUPPORT isn't enabled in most of mips boards(except CAVIUM_OCTEON_SOC, and edgerouter

Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2][PATCH] features: avoid enabling edac feature in mips

2019-12-05 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 12/3/19 11:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:38 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote: On 12/2/19 12:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: In message: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2][PATCH] features: avoid enabling edac feature in mips on 27/11/2019 yanfei...@windriver.com

Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2][PATCH] features: avoid enabling edac feature in mips

2019-12-03 Thread Xu, Yanfei
On 12/2/19 12:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: In message: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2][PATCH] features: avoid enabling edac feature in mips on 27/11/2019 yanfei...@windriver.com wrote: From: Yanfei Xu When some layer include this edac feature and bitbake kernel ARCH