Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-04-01 Thread Xu, Yanfei


On 4/1/20 8:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:07 PM Xu, Yanfei  wrote:

Hi Bruce,

Not a build failure, but a compile warning. when I built 
v5.4/standard/xilinx-zynq kernel, It
occured the blow warning in log.do_compile.

# work-shared/xilinx-zynq/kernel-source/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c:1829:6: warning: 
unused variable 'i_version' [-Wunused-variable]
# 1829 | u64 i_version; ^
# CC fs/ubifs/replay.o



Aha. Thanks, that helps.

I squashed a bunch of those errors when updating the support, but one
must have slipped through.


Then I took a look at the previous commits about yaffs2 in 
linux-yocto/v5.4/standard/base
kernel and found the yaffs2 code was been updated recently. Some defferences 
about yaffs_readdir()
in yaffs_vfs.c than before. It causes the following patch[yaffs: Fix build 
failure...1fffb37acca0]
appled 'u64 i_version' at a wrong place. Maybe there is a glable i_version 
variable somewhere,
hence it didn't occur a build failure.

Agreed. I'll fixup the header slightly and merge the patch.

Have you tried linux-yocto-dev ? I also had to update yaffs2 there,
and may need a similar fix.


Yep, I have tried it. Yaffs2 in linux-yocto-dev was not updated as in 
linux-yocto, hence it


doesn't have the issue. However, you should pay attention to this 
place,if you update


yaffs2 in linux-yocto-dev someday.


Regards,

Yanfei


Bruce


Regards,

Yanfei

On 3/31/20 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

What configuration is showing this build failure ? All my 5.4 builds
come back green, with yaffs2 enabled. Do you have some different
options enabled ? I'd like to reproduce it locally.

root@qemuarm64:~# uname -a
Linux qemuarm64 5.4.28-yocto-standard #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 30
14:29:06 UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@qemuarm64:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep YAFFS2
CONFIG_YAFFS_YAFFS2=y
CONFIG_YAFFS_AUTO_YAFFS2=y
root@qemuarm64:~#

Bruce

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:09 PM  wrote:

From: Yanfei Xu 

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu 
---
  fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644
--- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
+++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
@@ -1826,7 +1826,6 @@ static int yaffs_iterate(struct file *f, struct 
dir_context *dc)
 int ret_val = 0;

 char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
-   u64 i_version;

 obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
 dev = obj->my_dev;
@@ -1900,6 +1899,7 @@ static int yaffs_readdir(struct file *f, void *dirent, 
filldir_t filldir)
 int ret_val = 0;

 char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
+   u64 i_version;

 obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
 dev = obj->my_dev;
--
2.18.2




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8570): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8570
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72670043/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-04-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:07 PM Xu, Yanfei  wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Not a build failure, but a compile warning. when I built 
> v5.4/standard/xilinx-zynq kernel, It
> occured the blow warning in log.do_compile.
>
> # work-shared/xilinx-zynq/kernel-source/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c:1829:6: 
> warning: unused variable 'i_version' [-Wunused-variable]
> # 1829 | u64 i_version; ^
> # CC fs/ubifs/replay.o
>
>

Aha. Thanks, that helps.

I squashed a bunch of those errors when updating the support, but one
must have slipped through.

> Then I took a look at the previous commits about yaffs2 in 
> linux-yocto/v5.4/standard/base
> kernel and found the yaffs2 code was been updated recently. Some defferences 
> about yaffs_readdir()
> in yaffs_vfs.c than before. It causes the following patch[yaffs: Fix build 
> failure...1fffb37acca0]
> appled 'u64 i_version' at a wrong place. Maybe there is a glable i_version 
> variable somewhere,
> hence it didn't occur a build failure.

Agreed. I'll fixup the header slightly and merge the patch.

Have you tried linux-yocto-dev ? I also had to update yaffs2 there,
and may need a similar fix.

Bruce

>
> Regards,
>
> Yanfei
>
> On 3/31/20 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> What configuration is showing this build failure ? All my 5.4 builds
> come back green, with yaffs2 enabled. Do you have some different
> options enabled ? I'd like to reproduce it locally.
>
> root@qemuarm64:~# uname -a
> Linux qemuarm64 5.4.28-yocto-standard #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 30
> 14:29:06 UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
> root@qemuarm64:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep YAFFS2
> CONFIG_YAFFS_YAFFS2=y
> CONFIG_YAFFS_AUTO_YAFFS2=y
> root@qemuarm64:~#
>
> Bruce
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:09 PM  wrote:
>
> From: Yanfei Xu 
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu 
> ---
>  fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644
> --- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> @@ -1826,7 +1826,6 @@ static int yaffs_iterate(struct file *f, struct 
> dir_context *dc)
> int ret_val = 0;
>
> char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
> -   u64 i_version;
>
> obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
> dev = obj->my_dev;
> @@ -1900,6 +1899,7 @@ static int yaffs_readdir(struct file *f, void *dirent, 
> filldir_t filldir)
> int ret_val = 0;
>
> char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
> +   u64 i_version;
>
> obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
> dev = obj->my_dev;
> --
> 2.18.2
>
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8569): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8569
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72670043/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-03-31 Thread Xu, Yanfei

Hi Bruce,

Not a build failure, but a compile warning. when I built 
v5.4/standard/xilinx-zynq kernel, It

occured the blow warning in log.do_compile.

/# work-shared/xilinx-zynq/kernel-source/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c:1829:6: 
warning: unused variable 'i_version' //[-Wunused-variable]/

/# 1829 | u64 i_version;//^/
/# CC fs/ubifs/replay.o/


Then I took a look at the previous commits about yaffs2 in 
linux-yocto/v5.4/standard/base
kernel and found the yaffs2 code was been updated recently. Some 
defferences about yaffs_readdir()
in yaffs_vfs.c than before. It causes the following patch[yaffs: Fix 
build failure...1fffb37acca0]
appled 'u64 i_version' at a wrong place. Maybe there is a glable 
i_version variable somewhere,

hence it didn't occur a build failure.

Regards,

Yanfei

On 3/31/20 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

What configuration is showing this build failure ? All my 5.4 builds
come back green, with yaffs2 enabled. Do you have some different
options enabled ? I'd like to reproduce it locally.

root@qemuarm64:~# uname -a
Linux qemuarm64 5.4.28-yocto-standard #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 30
14:29:06 UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@qemuarm64:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep YAFFS2
CONFIG_YAFFS_YAFFS2=y
CONFIG_YAFFS_AUTO_YAFFS2=y
root@qemuarm64:~#

Bruce

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:09 PM  wrote:

From: Yanfei Xu 

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu 
---
  fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644
--- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
+++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
@@ -1826,7 +1826,6 @@ static int yaffs_iterate(struct file *f, struct 
dir_context *dc)
 int ret_val = 0;

 char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
-   u64 i_version;

 obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
 dev = obj->my_dev;
@@ -1900,6 +1899,7 @@ static int yaffs_readdir(struct file *f, void *dirent, 
filldir_t filldir)
 int ret_val = 0;

 char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
+   u64 i_version;

 obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
 dev = obj->my_dev;
--
2.18.2



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8568): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8568
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72670043/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-03-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
What configuration is showing this build failure ? All my 5.4 builds
come back green, with yaffs2 enabled. Do you have some different
options enabled ? I'd like to reproduce it locally.

root@qemuarm64:~# uname -a
Linux qemuarm64 5.4.28-yocto-standard #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 30
14:29:06 UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@qemuarm64:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep YAFFS2
CONFIG_YAFFS_YAFFS2=y
CONFIG_YAFFS_AUTO_YAFFS2=y
root@qemuarm64:~#

Bruce

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:09 PM  wrote:
>
> From: Yanfei Xu 
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu 
> ---
>  fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644
> --- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
> @@ -1826,7 +1826,6 @@ static int yaffs_iterate(struct file *f, struct 
> dir_context *dc)
> int ret_val = 0;
>
> char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
> -   u64 i_version;
>
> obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
> dev = obj->my_dev;
> @@ -1900,6 +1899,7 @@ static int yaffs_readdir(struct file *f, void *dirent, 
> filldir_t filldir)
> int ret_val = 0;
>
> char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
> +   u64 i_version;
>
> obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
> dev = obj->my_dev;
> --
> 2.18.2
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8567): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8567
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72670043/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.4/standard/base][PATCH] fixup! yaffs: Fix build failure by handling inode i_version with proper atomic API

2020-03-30 Thread Xu, Yanfei
From: Yanfei Xu 

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu 
---
 fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
index 4fbd0a42ff3d..7a951baaf043 100644
--- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
+++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
@@ -1826,7 +1826,6 @@ static int yaffs_iterate(struct file *f, struct 
dir_context *dc)
int ret_val = 0;
 
char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
-   u64 i_version;
 
obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
dev = obj->my_dev;
@@ -1900,6 +1899,7 @@ static int yaffs_readdir(struct file *f, void *dirent, 
filldir_t filldir)
int ret_val = 0;
 
char name[YAFFS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
+   u64 i_version;
 
obj = yaffs_dentry_to_obj(Y_GET_DENTRY(f));
dev = obj->my_dev;
-- 
2.18.2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8566): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8566
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72670043/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-