Hi Jon,
It's definitely a good idea, but unfortunately I do not have
appropriate hardware in my lab. :-(
Witj best regards,
Alexander Smirnov
4 марта 2012 г. 20:43 пользователь jonsm...@gmail.com
написал:
> Has anyone tried a doing a hard MAC implementation? A lot of people
> have mc13224 based
On 5 March 2012 00:31, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>>
>>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I see an interest in an IRC meeting on the future of 802.15.4 for Linux,
> current plans of different implementors and interested people.
>
> I would like to invite all people interested in such meeting to fill
> the data i
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:02 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:47 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
BTW, the 6lowpan support I did
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:02 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:47 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> BTW, the 6lowpan support I did a long time ago was a port of the
>>> 6lowpan code out of Contiki and
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:47 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> BTW, the 6lowpan support I did a long time ago was a port of the
>> 6lowpan code out of Contiki and onto Linux. Did that code end up being
>> the basis for 6lowpan sup
If you aren't familiar with Contiki is also include a full 6lowpan/RPL
implementation. There is a program call tunslip6 that talks to an
Econotag running the border router code. It exchanges packets at the
TCP layer in order to do IPv6 routing out onto the mote network.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmai
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:47 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> BTW, the 6lowpan support I did a long time ago was a port of the
> 6lowpan code out of Contiki and onto Linux. Did that code end up being
> the basis for 6lowpan support in linux-zigbee? I got pulled onto
> another project and lost track
sOn Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Prajosh Premdas
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> Implementing Full MAC in the SoC/stick/etc. code is a good idea. I had
>> plans implementing some parts of that code on Freescale eval boards
>> (HCS08 + MC13192 radio). I know sev
Guys,
I see an interest in an IRC meeting on the future of 802.15.4 for Linux,
current plans of different implementors and interested people.
I would like to invite all people interested in such meeting to fill
the data in the table at
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/linux-zigbee/wiki/IRCMeetup
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 04/03/12 23:19, Prajosh Premdas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Sol
On 04/03/12 23:19, Prajosh Premdas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Summary on all the patchset below.
Prajosh,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> John,
>
> On 04/03/12 21:38, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>
>>> No. At this moment IEEE 802.15.4 does not qua
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>>
>>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Lin
John,
On 04/03/12 21:38, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> No. At this moment IEEE 802.15.4 does not qualify as a sane default,
>> because MAC implementation is far from being
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>
>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
>> don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting yo
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> cc2530, mc13224 and stm32w are all in common use. They don't cost that
>> much more than the non-SOC chips.
>
> True. But the fact is that there are plenty of non-SOC chips in the
> market too and a good implementation (good == widely adopte
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:30 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Prajosh Premdas
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Var
> cc2530, mc13224 and stm32w are all in common use. They don't cost that
> much more than the non-SOC chips.
True. But the fact is that there are plenty of non-SOC chips in the
market too and a good implementation (good == widely adopted and used)
should cater to both. In this regard, I guess the
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Prajosh Premdas
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
Hi,
> BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips h
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips having ACK/filter MAC acceleration. Does
Atmel have a chip with
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Prajosh Premdas
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips having ACK/filter MAC acceleration. Does
>>> Atmel have a chip with support for beaconing or beaconed networks?
>>
>> You are right, they
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips having ACK/filter MAC acceleration. Does
>> Atmel have a chip with support for beaconing or beaconed networks?
>
> You are right, they both support auto ACK, CSMA-CA, retries and
> address filtering.
On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Summary on all the patchset below.
>
> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
> don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting your work.
> There are some coding standards. There are some ideas behi
Has anyone tried a doing a hard MAC implementation? A lot of people
have mc13224 based Econotags. Those devices support either a soft or
hard MAC implementation.
Doing a hard MAC implementation might be a first step towards getting
soft MAC ones fully working.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
--
Hi,
> BTW: I remember rf231/rf212 chips having ACK/filter MAC acceleration. Does
> Atmel have a chip with support for beaconing or beaconed networks?
You are right, they both support auto ACK, CSMA-CA, retries and
address filtering. They do support beacon-enabled networks in that
they can send ou
26 matches
Mail list logo
