Hai Alex,
On February 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi,
>
> okay I will try to answer all question in this mail.
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> > This is the packet i received from TinyOS node :
> >
> > 41 c8 00 22 00 ff ff c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:46:15PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> Hai Alex,
>
>
> On February 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > okay I will try to answer all question in this mail.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> > > This is the p
I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple years ago and the version in
there implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06; we were able to interop with
Contiki implementation of the same but I imagine the world has moved
forward since then...
Steve
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Alexander Aring w
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty wrote:
> I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple years ago and the version in
> there implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06; we were able to interop with
> Contiki implementation of the same but I imagine the world has moved
> f
Hai Stephen...
Do you have any patch that can be update the BLIP stack as per RFC6282 complaint
? . .
-Bhadram
On February 20, 2014 at 2:07 AM Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty wrote:
> > I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple ye
