2009/2/18 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
frankly I do not understand this. Neither of them are newbies. Both of
them are valuable members of this list. What are you going to achieve by
moderating them for a week? Are you going to counsel and reform
them? Or do you feel 'punishment' will
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
In this case, the discussion is highly relevant as it gives a clear pointer
as to why so few women appear on community mailing lists. This is a
problem that worries a lot of us. I personally was horrified at the sexist
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Rajeev R. K. rajee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, I think i might be able to make it across, as wed afternoon isnt
booked for me atm.
Contact me off list in order to see what topics we can work out...
Prashant Shah has already volunteered for the session on 25th on
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 13:44:42 Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-
kbc.org wrote:
In this case, the discussion is highly relevant as it gives a clear
pointer as to why so few women appear on community mailing lists.
This is
a problem
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 11:49:19 Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
only ooold people know all this. I saw the first episode back in 1980
Hey, I'm still 23 and I've seen all the episodes,
kiddo, you weren't even *born* then - how could you have seen the first
one?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against freedom.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Everything is fine [was] threads [was] [OT] Invitation to connect
on LinkedIn
Date: Wednesday 18 February
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2009, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against
freedom.
She was moderated for failing to voluntarily stop a flamewar. Nothing
to do with women's rights, and no
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Mehul Ved mehul.n@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Rajeev R. K. rajee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, I think i might be able to make it across, as wed afternoon isnt
booked for me atm.
Contact me off list in order to see what topics we can work
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 14:39:26 Raj Mathur wrote:
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2009, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against
freedom.
She was moderated for failing to voluntarily
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
to address a woman as 'My dear' on a mailing list is sexism.
Please quote the law which says I cannot do that.
--
Regards,
Dinesh A. Joshi
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.jo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
wrote:
to address a woman as 'My dear' on a mailing list is sexism.
Please quote the law which says I cannot do that.
ROTFL ! sorry but i cannot
2009/2/18 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against freedom.
She was not put on moderation. I've confirmed with others, and nobody
received a pending moderation request from
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against freedom.
Kenneth this is a *sad* day. Womens rights? Stop making an issue out
of a non-issue.
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2009, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 14:39:26 Raj Mathur wrote:
[Vid] was moderated for failing to voluntarily stop a flamewar.
there are just flame wars - and inconsequential ones. I personally
feel that *any* moderation is unjustified and against
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Anurag anu...@gnuer.org wrote:
She was not put on moderation. I've confirmed with others, and nobody
received a pending moderation request from Mailman. So, the remark
that she is moderated is incorrect.
Now can I ridicule her for being incompetent or will I be
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 15:26:05 Anurag wrote:
2009/2/18 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against
freedom.
She was not put on moderation. I've confirmed with
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
that is why I said 'if she has been put under moderation' anyway she
thought she had been moderated and has left. It is a pity.
It was her incompetence ( guilty conscience? ) that she thought she
was moderated. I'm sure
This article is on livemint.com
http://m.livemint.com/srsstore/showPage.do;jsessionid=77F621E51C8F92E862EE24D515E26A30?siteId=33513pageId=22337342htmlUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.livemint.com%2F2009%2F02%2F17231746%2FIndia8217s-open-source-futu.htmlitemPos=4
--
--Dinesh Shah :-)
+91-98213-11906
Shah
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Harsh Busa harsh.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Please quote the law which says I cannot do that.
ROTFL ! sorry but i cannot control laughing on this one.
good one dude. you need a vacation
My dear Luggers,
Err.
I need vacation too ;)
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry |
Just wanted to chime in ...
Anurag wrote:
2009/2/18 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
frankly I do not understand this. Neither of them are newbies. Both of
them are valuable members of this list. What are you going to achieve by
moderating them for a week? Are you going to counsel and
My gmail has sponsored ads towards the right. Consistently on this thread i
receive ads of
1. Linux Commands
2.Workplace bullying
3.Linux Howto
4.Office Bullying .
5.Full text search on philosophy ...
Thank you,
SG
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Sachin Gopalakrishnan
mai...@sachingopal.com wrote:
My gmail has sponsored ads towards the right. Consistently on this thread i
receive ads of
4.Office Bullying .
5.Full text search on philosophy ...
ROFL!
It is interesting to see how stupid or intelligent
snip
so is the thread over now?
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
Hi
I want to install oracle 9i on RHEL 4 can anyone help me to get patches
for same.
Thanks n Regards
Dinesh Dalvi
begin:vcard
fn:Dinesh Dalvi
n:Dalvi;Dinesh
adr:RSC 33, Gorai II, Borivali (W);;203 / c12, Kinara CHS, ;Mumbai;MAH;400091;INDIA
email;internet:ddli...@gawab.com
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 11:27:14 Rajeev R. K. wrote:
obi-wan kenobi - friend of anakin and mentor of luke - luke is
famous as
in 'go to the source luke'
Wow, i never dreamed of the day when i'd see a techie who isnt
familiar with either
Prakash Shetty wrote:
I hate seeing my phone buzz every few seconds with unwanted spam.
I hope you guys understand.
List emails can sometimes flood the inbox as there are many members.
Keep a separate email id, other than your official one for that and view
list messages directly at
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Rajeev R. K. rajee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Mehul Ved mehul.n@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the venue?
Check his previous mail. It's RAIT College in Nerul.
--
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
I was requested to forward this. If Vid has been moderated for
defending women's rights, it is a sad thing and a blow against freedom.
Kenneth this is a *sad* day. Womens rights? Stop
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:38:21 Anurag wrote:
Continue flaming each other, and both of you will be put on moderation
for a week.
frankly I do not understand this. Neither of them are newbies. Both of
them are
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Dinesh Dalvi ddli...@gawab.com wrote:
Hi
I want to install oracle 9i on RHEL 4 can anyone help me to get patches for
same.
Hi Dinesh,
What patches are you looking for? From my experience, all patches
listed in the doc are not required to install Oracle 9i.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:31 AM, steve st...@lonetwin.net wrote:
For example, I am choosing to do that Dinesh's latest 'i didn't do anything
wrong' troll post too. He is a troll and not worth my bytes.
Steve, calling me a troll isn't going to do any good. If you really
care to ignore trolls
Hello,
A client of mine only needs to read DWG files and print them. Currently
he uses the free DWG viewer from Autodesk in doze. I want to migrate him
to Linux. On the net there are hardly any proper viewers that I could
find. There is an lx-viewer but it uses openDWG libraries that are
Hi Good Morning
I want to install oracle 9i on RHEL 4 can anyone help me to get patches
for same.
Thanks n Regards
Dinesh Dalvi
begin:vcard
fn:Dinesh Dalvi
n:Dalvi;Dinesh
adr:RSC 33, Gorai II, Borivali (W);;203 / c12, Kinara CHS, ;Mumbai;MAH;400091;INDIA
email;internet:ddli...@gawab.com
Hello everybody,
I didn't get a chance to meet with you all and talk about OLPC in my
last visit to Mumbai. I'm going to bug you with some more info. This
is FYI.
Some of you may be interested in this post regarding a Mumbai-centric
One Laptop Per Child group. OLPC Pune just got going last week.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Stop and think for a few seconds...what will they do with it as they
grow up? The possibilities are incredible! Feed the revolution!!!
My thought for first second is that why it is so hard to get OLPC
machine for
snip
This demo+installfest is being held in conjunction with a technical
fest organised by six engineering college student branches of the
IEEE(http://www.ieee.org) Bombay Section called IEEE 360
Degrees(http://www.ieee360.com).
The fest is called FOSSCan in the spirit of Barack Obama's We Can
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Kartik Mistry kartik.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Stop and think for a few seconds...what will they do with it as they
grow up? The possibilities are incredible! Feed the revolution!!!
My thought
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
As a neutral observer may I add a few bits and bytes. The first
provocation came from the lady and until the feminist issue came up I
did not know it was a lady. Given DJ's nature ( a tail as straight as
'jalebi' ) he simply
I haven't read your message, but you clearly do not want to stop being
controversial after repeated requests. I would suggest that you show
some restraint.
Request members not to contribute to this flamewar, and only
participate if they have something meaningful to say. No more mails
from Dinesh
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 17:01:28 steve wrote:
i wonder if that happens in Indian mailing lists. Maybe, there is something
else that is more relevant to Indian sensibilities which parallels godwin's
law.
s/nazi/sri rama sena/
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:28:46 Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Thanks Rony. I didn't know who this VidAyer person
if you had said 'I didn't know who Vidayer was' instead of referring to her as
'this VidAyer person', I may have been motivated to read the rest of your
post.
--
regards
Kenneth
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:28:46 Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Thanks Rony. I didn't know who this VidAyer person
if you had said 'I didn't know who Vidayer was' instead of referring to her as
'this VidAyer person', I may
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2009 21:06:12 Rony wrote:
Wonder what is so special about people in strange helmets flying around
and fighting each other with brightly lit tubelights? :-D
``I find your lack of faith disturbing.''
- Darth Vader
:P
Mrugesh
--
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Anurag anu...@gnuer.org wrote:
I haven't read your message, but you clearly do not want to stop being
controversial after repeated requests. I would suggest that you show
some restraint.
Request members not to contribute to this flamewar, and only
participate
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:30 AM, VidAyer v...@svaksha.com wrote:
Devdas, as per our IRC chat, I sent this message yesterday, more than
12 hours ago, but didnt get a pending admin approval message till
today. Are'nt non-members supposed to get the pending message?
As per my understanding,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Nah thats fine. You should read the post before you take action, really.
How this mail came to list?
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Blog.en: ftbfs.wordpress.com
On Thursday 19 Feb 2009, Anurag wrote:
I haven't read your message, but you clearly do not want to stop
being controversial after repeated requests. I would suggest that you
show some restraint.
Request members not to contribute to this flamewar, and only
participate if they have something
On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:02:44 Raj Mathur wrote:
On Thursday 19 Feb 2009, Anurag wrote:
I haven't read your message, but you clearly do not want to stop
being controversial after repeated requests. I would suggest that
you
show some restraint.
Request members not to contribute
48 matches
Mail list logo
