If we echo an address the hypervisor doesn't like to
/sys/devices/system/memory/probe we oops the box:
# echo 0x100 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:541!
The backtrace is:
create_section_mapping
arch_add_memory
add_memory
memory_probe_stor
While converting code to use for_each_node_by_type I noticed a
number of coding style issues.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
Index: linux-powerpc/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
===
--- linux-powerpc.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/setu
Use for_each_node_by_type instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
Index: linux-powerpc/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
===
--- linux-powerpc.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c 2011-08-10
16:1
During memory hotplug testing, I got the following warning:
ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /memory@0
of_node_release
kref_put
of_node_put
of_find_node_by_type
hot_add_node_scn_to_nid
hot_add_scn_to_nid
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid
...
of_find_node_by_type() loop does the of_node_put for us so we on
The various port_init_hw methods of ppc4xx_pciex_hwops should have been
marked __init and when I added ppc4xx_pciex_port_reset_sdr(), which is
__init. This added many section mismatch warnings like:
WARNING: arch/powerpc/sysdev/built-in.o(.text+0x5c68): Section mismatch in
reference from the fun
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>
>>> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
>>> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:16:33PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >
> >> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
> >> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010
Am 11.08.2011 um 01:58 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 07/23/2011 09:41 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>> This makes arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rmhandlers.S and
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S be assembled as
>>> separate co
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/23/2011 09:41 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >This makes arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rmhandlers.S and
> >arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S be assembled as
> >separate compilation units rather than having them #included in
> >arc
On 10.08.2011, at 20:56, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 16:58 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 08:55 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>> On a box with gcc 4.3.2, I see errors like:
>>>
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S:1254: Error: Unrecognized opcode
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 16:58 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 08:55 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On a box with gcc 4.3.2, I see errors like:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S:1254: Error: Unrecognized opcode:
> > stxvd2x
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S:13
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a few fixes for powerpc. Mostly innocuous stuff, in fact most of
> > it has been in my tree for a while, I just hadn't got a chance to actually
> > send it a
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 01:30 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Also may wa
On 08/10/2011 01:30 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for
anything
On 08/10/2011 01:35 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:27:52PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> "...and then associate the label with an alias."
>>
>> The alias can then be used if you want "can0" versus "can1".
>
> Does the alias get used by either the kernel or something else or is it
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:27:52PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 01:23 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > On 08/10/2011 06:00 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> > ...
> >> It looks like the way to do that is to assign a label to
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> >>> - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(cont
On 08/10/2011 01:23 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 06:00 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> ...
>> It looks like the way to do that is to assign a label to those devices
>> and then associate the label with an alias. I have
Hi Ben,
Finally somewhat caught up. Now that -rc1 is out, here are some
patches for the next merge window.
josh
The following changes since commit 53d1e658df6e26d62500410719aaee2b82067c03:
Merge branch 'devicetree/merge' of
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 (2011-08-04 06:37:07 -1000)
ar
On 08/10/2011 06:00 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
...
> It looks like the way to do that is to assign a label to those devices
> and then associate the label with an alias. I have no idea how that
> works under the hood, but it is the way
On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
>> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
>> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device only has
>> an oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a few fixes for powerpc. Mostly innocuous stuff, in fact most of
> it has been in my tree for a while, I just hadn't got a chance to actually
> send it as I was travelling.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> The following changes sinc
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:38 PM, David Laight wrote:
>
>>> Bitfields are rather non-portable, the compiler has a lot of choice
>>> about how to align the bits in memory.
>>
>> I'm ok with the masking stuff.
>> However, I'm actually surprised this is true given the
>> maturity of our ABIs.
>
> Th
> > Bitfields are rather non-portable, the compiler has a lot of choice
> > about how to align the bits in memory.
>
> I'm ok with the masking stuff.
> However, I'm actually surprised this is true given the
> maturity of our ABIs.
The C standard says nothing at all about how bitfields are impl
On 11-08-10 12:01 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
>>> thus
>>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>>>
>>> This patc
On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
>>> - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
>>> - the CAN Protocol I
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, David Laight wrote:
>
>> I have some and use them in some code, they represent ISA
>> 2.06 MAVN=1 (version 2)
>> Can I keep them?
>> if so, should I put them somewhere useful to others?
>>
>> Examples:
>> union mas1 {
>> u32 _val;
>> struct {
>>
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
>
>> I have some and use them in some code, they represent ISA 2.06 MAVN=1
>> (version 2)
>> Can I keep them?
>> if so, should I put them somewhere useful to others?
>>
>> Examples:
>> union
>>> So the node names should be
>>> can@1c000 {
>>> can@1d000 {
>>> correct?
>>>
>> [Bhaskar] As there are two CAN controllers on P1010,So won't it be better
>> to distinguish it by can0 and can1 instead by simple "can" ?
>
> I have some and use them in some code, they represent ISA
> 2.06 MAVN=1 (version 2)
> Can I keep them?
> if so, should I put them somewhere useful to others?
>
> Examples:
> union mas1 {
> u32 _val;
> struct {
> u32 v:1;
> u32 iprot:1;
> u
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> I have some and use them in some code, they represent ISA 2.06 MAVN=1
> (version 2)
> Can I keep them?
> if so, should I put them somewhere useful to others?
>
> Examples:
> union mas1 {
> u32 _val;
> struct {
> u32 v
I have some and use them in some code, they represent ISA 2.06 MAVN=1 (version
2)
Can I keep them?
if so, should I put them somewhere useful to others?
Examples:
union mas1 {
u32 _val;
struct {
u32 v:1;
u32 iprot:1;
u32 tid:14;
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:17:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhas
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> > - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
> > - the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clo
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: R
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday,
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device only has
> an oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
> Acked-by: Marc Kle
On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
> - the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
> - (driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock.
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:46 PM
>>> To: Wolfgang Grandegger
>>> Cc: Robin Holt; Marc K
This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not needed as the frequency of the source clock is
fixed, there is not external divider beyond what the driver already
works with, and the clock sourc
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device only has
an oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde ,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger ,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B223
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Cc: Grant Lik
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de
Cc: net...@vger
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de
Cc: net...@vger
With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have
done no testing beyond compile testing on an arm system as I have no
access to an arm based system.
For the first three patches in the series, I belie
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
> > ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
> > right as possible.
> >
> > I think
On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
>> thus
>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>>
>> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:46 PM
> > To: Wolfgang Grandegger
> > Cc: Robin Holt; Marc Kleine-Budde; U Bhaskar-B22300; Wood Scott-B07421;
> >
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus
> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>
> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500
> systems
> depend on PPC_E500_V1_V2.
I
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> Hi Robin,
> >>
> >> On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> In working with the socketcan develop
Hi Linus !
Here are a few fixes for powerpc. Mostly innocuous stuff, in fact most of
it has been in my tree for a while, I just hadn't got a chance to actually
send it as I was travelling.
Cheers,
Ben.
The following changes since commit 53d1e658df6e26d62500410719aaee2b82067c03:
Merge branch '
On 08/03/2011 08:55 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On a box with gcc 4.3.2, I see errors like:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S:1254: Error: Unrecognized opcode:
stxvd2x
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S:1316: Error: Unrecognized opcode: lxvd2x
Paul, mind to ack?
Alex
Signed-
On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
> ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
> right as possible.
>
> I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
> the Documen
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 04:15 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> ...
>> Done, except the
>>> compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
>>
>> line is
>> compatible = "
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
>>> the Documentation...fsl-flexcan.txt
On 08/10/2011 04:15 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
...
> Done, except the
>> compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
>
> line is
> compatible = "fsl,flexcan", "fsl,flexcan-p1010";
IIRC, there order is more to l
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:46 PM
> To: Wolfgang Grandegger
> Cc: Robin Holt; Marc Kleine-Budde; U Bhaskar-B22300; Wood Scott-B07421;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; Kumar Gala; socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de; PPC
> list
>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:06:02PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
> an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
> on the Freescale P1010 processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
> To: Marc Kleine-Budde
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
> > the Documentation...fsl-flexcan.txt device tree documentation needs to
> > be cleaned up.
Hi Robin,
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
> the Documentation...fsl-flexcan.txt device tree documentation needs to
> be cleaned up. The driver does not depend upon any properties other
Your first sentence could
There are multiple features in PowerPC KVM that can now be enabled
depending on the user's wishes. Some of the combinations don't make
sense or don't work though.
So this patch adds a way to check if the executing environment would
actually be able to run the guest properly. It also adds sanity
ch
On 08/10/2011 02:26 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:59:41AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 10.08.2011 um 06:42 schrieb Paul Mackerras:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:31:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Now that Book3S PV mode can also run PAPR guests, we can add a PAPR cap
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:59:41AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Am 10.08.2011 um 06:42 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
>
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:31:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >> Now that Book3S PV mode can also run PAPR guests, we can add a PAPR cap and
> >> enable it for all Bo
Hi Stephen,
> > Index: linux-powerpc/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > ===
> > --- linux-powerpc.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c 2011-06-06
> > 08:07:35.148708089 +1000 +++
> > linux-powerpc/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c2011-08-10
> > 11:
On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
> its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have
> done no testing beyond compile testing on an arm system as I have no
> access to an arm based system.
>
On 08/10/2011 12:11 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
>>> its two can ports and also can communicate with an external P
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..16fae04
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
> > its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have
> > done no testing beyond compi
Grant,
Do you need this patch resent with you on the Cc: list or can you pick
up the discussion from here? I am just trying to minimize noise on
the mailing lists if it is not needed.
The essence of the discussion to this point is:
1) Freescale built a board support package for a new processor
On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
> its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have
> done no testing beyond compile testing on an arm system as I have no
> access to an arm based system.
>
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 can device only has an
> oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde ,
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:49:34 +1000 Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> During memory hotplug testing, I got the following warning:
>
>
> ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /memory@0
>
> of_find_node_by_type() loop does of_node_put for us so remove the
> duplicate one inside the loop.
But does an of
Robin,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:06:04PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
> the Documentation...fsl-flexcan.txt device tree documentation needs to
> be cleaned up. The driver does not depend upon any properties other
> than the r
Am 10.08.2011 um 06:42 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:31:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Now that Book3S PV mode can also run PAPR guests, we can add a PAPR cap and
>> enable it for all Book3S targets. Enabling that CAP switches KVM into PAPR
>> mode.
>
> Don't we
74 matches
Mail list logo
