On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
This adds a common board file for almost all of the simple PowerPC 44x
boards that exist today. This is intended to be a single place to add
support for boards that do not differ in platform support from most of the
evaluation boards that are used
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:33:21 +0200
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
This adds a common board file for almost all of the simple PowerPC 44x
boards that exist today. This is intended to be a single place to add
support for boards that do
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
This adds a common board file for almost all of the simple PowerPC 44x
boards that exist today. This is intended to be a single place to add
support for boards that do not
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 08:15 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
This adds a common board file for almost all of the simple PowerPC 44x
boards that exist today. This is intended to be
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:45:47 -0400
Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 08:15 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
This adds a common board file for almost all
You should fix 52xx with the same for loop change then, since I
blatantly most of this file from you ;)
Heh, then factor out mpc5200_simple_probe() into a helper and use it
instead of copying it as ppc44x_probe? ;)
If you stick to the NULL-terminated array version, then it becomes easy
to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:33:06 -0700
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should fix 52xx with the same for loop change then, since I
blatantly most of this file from you ;)
Heh, then factor out mpc5200_simple_probe() into a helper and use it
instead of copying it as ppc44x_probe?
Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a
list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely
different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different.
Or am I totally missing what you are saying?
Yeah, I wasn't clear -- I meant to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:19:02 -0700
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a
list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely
different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different.
Yeah, I wasn't clear -- I meant to add a new helper like
of_flat_dt_is_compatible_list() (not sure of the name) that takes a node
and a NULL-terminated array of strings, and then mpc5200_simple_probe()
can become a one-liner, along with mpc5121_generic_probe(),
tqm85xx_probe(),
This adds a common board file for almost all of the simple PowerPC 44x
boards that exist today. This is intended to be a single place to add
support for boards that do not differ in platform support from most of the
evaluation boards that are used as reference platforms. Boards that have
11 matches
Mail list logo
