* Olof Johansson | 2008-06-25 16:22:50 [-0500]:
>> Kumar / Josh: Should we describe those DT entries in
>> Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt? In the yes case: which
>> section do you recommend?
>
>I don't see a need to. We don't document the IBM busses there either.
Okey.
>
>
>-Olof
(Taking off the USB cc list)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:24:25PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> Kumar / Josh: Should we describe those DT entries in
> Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt? In the yes case: which
> section do you recommend?
I don't see a need to. We don't document the I
* Nate Case | 2008-06-17 11:11:38 [-0500]:
>This adds support for hardware configurations that don't match the
>chip default register settings (e.g., 16-bit data bus, DACK and
>DREQ pulled up instead of down, analog overcurrent mode).
>
>These settings are passed in via the OF device tree. The PC
On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Nate Case wrote:
This adds support for hardware configurations that don't match the
chip default register settings (e.g., 16-bit data bus, DACK and
DREQ pulled up instead of down, analog overcurrent mode).
These settings are passed in via the OF device tree. The
This adds support for hardware configurations that don't match the
chip default register settings (e.g., 16-bit data bus, DACK and
DREQ pulled up instead of down, analog overcurrent mode).
These settings are passed in via the OF device tree. The PCI
interface still assumes the same default values
