On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:53:16AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
I used “function(arg1, arg2, …)” at the *beginning* of functions when
the arguments passed to the function were included in the message. In
all other cases I
On 06/12/2014 11:21 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
Lastly, I
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Michal Nazarewicz min...@mina86.com wrote:
I used “function(arg1, arg2, …)” at the *beginning* of functions when
the arguments passed to the function were included in the message. In
all other cases I left it at just “function:” (or just no additional
prefix). IMO that's
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area().
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
Lastly, I
Hi Joonsoo,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to me, so I unify log format to print function
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:11:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
bad to
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:18:53PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Joonsoo,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
And, some logs print function name and others
10 matches
Mail list logo
