> >> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Paul, I can include this in my 'next' branch if you aren't opposed.
> >I'll have another set of patches going in there today/tomorrow.
>
> Er... on second thought, this actually fixes a reg
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:11:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:39:04 +1000
>David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The PCI bridge on the Holly board is current incorrectly represented
>> in the device tree. The current device tree node for the PCI bridge
>> sits under th
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:39:04 +1000
David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The PCI bridge on the Holly board is current incorrectly represented
> in the device tree. The current device tree node for the PCI bridge
> sits under the tsi-bridge node. That's not obviously wrong, but the
> PCI brid
The PCI bridge on the Holly board is current incorrectly represented
in the device tree. The current device tree node for the PCI bridge
sits under the tsi-bridge node. That's not obviously wrong, but the
PCI bridge translated some PCI spaces into CPU address ranges which
were not translated by t