Re: 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting

On Friday 09 January 2009 01:33:12 Dave Hansen wrote: > Now I'm even more confused. Could you please send a fully changelogged > patch that describes the problem, and how this fixes it? This just > seems like an off-by-one error, which isn't what I thought we had before > at all. > > I'm also ho

[PATCH] powerpc: rework dma-noncoherent to use generic vmap/vunmap functions

This patch rewrites consistent dma allocations support to use vmalloc layer to allocate virtual memory space from vmalloc pool and get rid of CONFIG_CONSISTENT_{START,SIZE}. Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 25 -- arch/powerpc/configs/40x/acadia_de

Re: Trouble moving custom MPC8548 board to U-boot 1.3

Hi all, >> I have spent quite some time trying to move from U-Boot 1.2 to a newer >> version.. I am stuck at the initialization of the ram. The ram checksum >> fails and gives me a "total memory of 0". (the board has 512MB and work >> when booting uboot 1.2) >> >> can anyone pls. point me in the ri

Re: Trouble moving custom MPC8548 board to U-boot 1.3

Hi all, >> I have spent quite some time trying to move from U-Boot 1.2 to a newer >> version.. I am stuck at the initialization of the ram. The ram checksum >> fails and gives me a "total memory of 0". (the board has 512MB and work >> when booting uboot 1.2) >> >> can anyone pls. point me in the ri

Re: [Patch 0/3] Overview, OProfile SPU event profiling support for IBM Cell processor

On 08.01.09 16:26:31, Carl Love wrote: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rric/oprofile.git cell > > > > The patches did not apply cleanly. I had to change the path to > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/, fix cell/pr_util.h and did some whitespace > > cleanups. Please run your tests on t

Re: mal_probe crash

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote: > > >With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with > > >the first parameter NULL. This was ok since

Re: mal_probe crash

On Wednesday 07 January 2009 23:50, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote: > > >With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with > > >the first parameter NULL. Th

Re: mal_probe crash

Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single EMAC. It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia. Matthias ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: mal_probe crash

On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single > EMAC. > It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia. Indeed. It doesn't on my sequoia :-( I also tried reviving connectivity by adding an Intel PRO/1000 GT network card, b

Re: Trouble moving custom MPC8548 board to U-boot 1.3

On Jan 9, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Pieter wrote: Hi all, I have spent quite some time trying to move from U-Boot 1.2 to a newer version.. I am stuck at the initialization of the ram. The ram checksum fails and gives me a "total memory of 0". (the board has 512MB and work when booting uboot 1.2)

RE: Linux on Memec Virtex4 FX12 Minimodule

Hi Pawel, Sorry for the delay, I just missed this message. You should really be building arch/powerpc not arch/ppc as no one is going to support that. I realize that's a pain, but arch/ppc has been dead for about 6 months now. http://xilinx.wikidot.com has

[PATCH] powerpc/52xx: Add support for the Media5200 board from Freescale

From: Grant Likely This patch adds board support for the Media5200 platform. Changes are: - add the media5200 device tree - add the media5200 platform support code and cascaded interrupt controller - add media5200 to the build targets. Note: this patch also includes a minor tweak to the lite520

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx: Properly update irq_desc when set_type() is called.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Matt Sealey wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Matt Sealey wrote: >>> >>> Grant Likely wrote: From: Grant Likely The MPC5200 PIC driver doesn't correctly update the .status field of the irq_desc structure wh

Re: mal_probe crash

> Could it be that simple. Probably not. It works at a first glace on > a 405EP ang GPr board. But it might cause problems when having more than > one EMAC up at the same time. I talked with the network folks and that should be ok. We only need to be a bit careful in case for some reason the EM

Re: mal_probe crash

On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 16:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single > > EMAC. > > It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia. > > Indeed. It doesn't on my sequoia :-( > > I al

Re: mal_probe crash

> Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into > a unsigned long before ioremap'ing the result, thus cropping the top > bits ? as far as I can see, e1000 is using pci_ioremap_bar(), which should do the right thing as long as resource_size_t is the right type (which i

[RFC][PATCH] powerpc: Unify opcodes

--- Wanted to get any feedback on this patch that unifies (or tries to) various opcode related functions into one file that we can use for emulation, code gen, and dealing with new insns old assemblers don't know about. I've got a bit of cleanup in ppc_opcode.h but figured its good enough for

Re: mal_probe crash

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:42:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > There isn't that I know of. The EMAC code creates a single NAPI instance > > for all EMACs and I think used to completely disconnect things. The old > > code created a fake

Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

Hey Ben, Here is my last minute pull request. It's pretty simple stuff all around, mostly in the bug-fix category. One new of_i2c() helper function. Biggest change is the xilinx spi driver; but it doesn't even compile without this. I have not included the media5200 platform support patch becau

[PATCH] cacheinfo: rename cache_dir per-cpu variable

The per_cpu__ prefix on DECLARE_PER_CPU'd variables is going away; rename cache_dir to cache_dir_pcpu. Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch --- arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Not sure which route this should go, I assume either Rusty o

Re: mal_probe crash

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 09:34 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:42:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > There isn't that I know of. The EMAC code creates a single NAPI instance > > > for all EMACs and I think used to

Re: Linux on Memec Virtex4 FX12 Minimodule

John, Thanks a lot for your reply. I didn't nottice the http://xilinx.wikidot.com/ site before, it looks very interesting. I gave ARCH=powerpc a try, but it didn't even boot, so I guess I'll try again with the site's guidance and more attention. Kind regards, -- Pawel P. Kusmierski l...@el-kfa.n

mpc8313erdb NAND memory map

I'm using the MPC8313ERDB.I readed the BSP user manual. I found the NAND is 32M bytes. But in the UM's memory map,it is only from 0xe280_ to 0xe280_7fff,just 32K bytes. Can anyone help to understand this problem? _ 微软地图率先推出跨城市

RE: mpc8313erdb NAND memory map

> I'm using the MPC8313ERDB.I readed the BSP user manual. > I found the NAND is 32M bytes. > But in the UM's memory map,it is only from 0xe280_ to > 0xe280_7fff,just 32K bytes. > Can anyone help to understand this problem? It is indirect access the NAND flash by 8313, the 8313 has to use o

[PATCH v4] Add PPC/4xx "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" EDAC MC Driver

This adds support for an EDAC memory controller adaptation driver for the "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" ECC controller realized in the AMCC PowerPC 405EX[r]. Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson --- At present, this driver has been developed and tested against the controller realization in the AMCC PPC405EX[r] o

[PATCH] powerpc: Warp patches for the new ndfc driver

Woo hoo! The ndfc driver finally got in the kernel! These patches update the warp to use the new driver. Cheers, Sean These patches allow the warp to use the new of platform ndfc driver. - warp.dts changed to work with ndfc - warp-nand.c no longer needed - removed obsolete rev A support from c