Re: [PATCH 1/1] Big endian swap for Marvell 6440 SAS driver

2011-06-14 Thread Cédric Cano
Hi Ben, You're alright! I hadn't thought to use le32_to_cpu. Do you want I make a new patch? Cedric Le 12/06/2011 00:45, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit : On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:56 +0200, Cédric Cano wrote: Hi, Marvell SAS driver doesn't work on powerpc architecture due to big endian swap.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Big endian swap for Marvell 6440 SAS driver

2011-06-14 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:42 +0200, Cédric Cano wrote: Hi Ben, You're alright! I hadn't thought to use le32_to_cpu. Do you want I make a new patch? Well, I'm not the maintainer of the subsystem or of the driver, so I'm not going to be the one accepting/merging it :-) I'm just reviewing the

Re: Mapping an executable page

2011-06-14 Thread Thomas De Schampheleire
Hi, On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire patrickdepinguin+linux...@gmail.com wrote: Although I realize that what I need to achieve is unconventional, what is the correct way of mapping a

Relocatable kernel for ppc44x

2011-06-14 Thread Michal Simek
Hi, have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x? Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Microblaze U-BOOT custodian

Re: Relocatable kernel for ppc44x

2011-06-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:04:45PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: Hi, have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x? Suzuki will be working on this eventually as part of getting kexec/kdump working for 44x. I've CC'd him. josh ___

Re: [PATCH] slub: fix kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1950!

2011-06-14 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 14:00 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pekka Enberg

[PATCH 06/15] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning kernel instruction TLB space. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se ---

[PATCH 07/15] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
This is an assembler version to fixup DAR not being set by dcbX, icbi instructions. There are two versions, one uses selfmodifing code, the other uses a jump table but is much bigger(default). Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 149

[PATCH 02/15] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
dcbz, dcbf, dcbi, dcbst and icbi do not set DAR when they cause a DTLB Error. Dectect this by tagging DAR with 0x00f0 at every exception exit that modifies DAR. This also fixes MachineCheck to pass DAR and DSISR as well. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se ---

[PATCH 05/15] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Update the TLB asm to make proper use of _PAGE_DIRTY and _PAGE_ACCESSED. Get rid of _PAGE_HWWRITE too. Pros: - PRESENT is copied to ACCESSED, fixing accounting - DIRTY is mapped to 0x100, the changed bit, and is set directly when a page has been made dirty. - Proper RO/RW mapping of user

[PATCH 09/15] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
only DTLB Miss did set this bit, DTLB Error needs too otherwise the setting is lost when the page becomes dirty. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 15/15] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss handlers

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Only update pte w.r.t ACCESSED if it isn't already set Wrap ACCESSED with #ifndef NO_SWAP for too ease optimization. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 11 +-- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 03/15] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
8xx sometimes need to load a invalid/non-present TLBs in it DTLB asm handler. These must be invalidated separately as 8xx MMU don't. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[PATCH 08/15] 8xx: CPU6 errata make DTLB error too big to fit.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
branch to common code in DTLB Miss instead. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 23 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S index

[PATCH 00/15] Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the the store bit when faulting into DTLB error. A few more bugs

[PATCH 14/15] 8xx: Optimize ITLBMiss handler.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Don't check for kernel space if no modules. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S index a4290b5..7f9e647

[PATCH 13/15] 8xx: Use symbolic constants in TLB asm

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Use the PTE #defines where possible instead of hardcoded constants. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S

[PATCH 10/15] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
8xx has not had WRITETHRU due to lack of bits in the pte. After the recent rewrite of the 8xx TLB code, there are two bits left. Use one of them to WRITETHRU. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |8 include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h

[PATCH 04/15] 8xx: Fix CONFIG_PIN_TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
The wrong register was loaded into MD_RPN. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S index b3aff21..9d8a1b5

[PATCH 12/15] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Now that 8xx can fixup dcbX instructions, start using them where possible like every other PowerPc arch do. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S | 18 -- arch/ppc/lib/string.S | 17 - 2 files changed, 0

[PATCH 11/15] 8xx: Set correct HW pte flags in DTLB Error too

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
DTLB Error needs to adjust the HW PTE bits as DTLB Miss does. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S index

[PATCH 01/15] 8xx: Use a macro to simpliy CPU6 errata code.

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se --- arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 84 +++ 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S index f9a30f3..ba05a57 100644

Re: [PATCH 06/15] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Dan Malek
Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing a rfi. . I'm going to argue we can easily visually inspect for this since the code is static with just a couple of RFIs in these exception handlers. Some 8xx

Re: [PATCH 00/15] Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4

2011-06-14 Thread Dan Malek
Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace. Thanks for your continued support. I have recently become involved in some 8xx development again, and have

[PATCH] powerpc/mm: add devmem_is_allowed() for STRICT_DEVMEM checking

2011-06-14 Thread Steve Best
Provide devmem_is_allowed() routine to restrict access to kernel memory from userspace. Set CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM config option to switch on checking. Signed-off-by: Steve Best sfb...@us.ibm.com diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug index

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: add devmem_is_allowed() for STRICT_DEVMEM checking

2011-06-14 Thread Nathan Lynch
Hi Steve, On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:58 -0400, Steve Best wrote: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug index e72dcf6..e1aab6b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug @@ -283,4 +283,15 @@ config PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_CPM_ADDR

Re: [PATCH 06/15] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Dan Malek ppc6...@digitaldans.com wrote on 2011/06/14 18:06:45: Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing a rfi. . I'm going to argue we can easily visually inspect for this since the code is static

Re: [PATCH 00/15] Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Dan Malek digitald...@digitaldans.com wrote on 2011/06/14 18:11:51: Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace. Thanks for your continued support.

Re: [PATCH 06/15] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Dan Malek
Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: I don't have a mpc850, do you? I have to say I do :-) Probably but that is another matter. You could continue with that if you like but I am stopping here ATM. Oh, come on... I've been thinking about this for years,

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: add devmem_is_allowed() for STRICT_DEVMEM checking

2011-06-14 Thread Steve Best
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:30 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote: Hi Steve, On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:58 -0400, Steve Best wrote: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug index e72dcf6..e1aab6b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug

Re: [PATCH 06/15] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

2011-06-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Dan Malek ppc6...@digitaldans.com wrote on 2011/06/14 20:11:18: Hi Joakim. On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: I don't have a mpc850, do you? I have to say I do :-) Good, you get to beat the crap out of it then :) Probably but that is another matter. You could

g4 cube [off topic query]

2011-06-14 Thread kevin diggs
Hi, Sorry for the noise ... But if anyone knows what a Cube power button gasket is made of please share! Is it conductive? Again, sorry for the noise. But I figured there might be some cube owners out here. Thanks! kevin ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: add devmem_is_allowed() for STRICT_DEVMEM checking

2011-06-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:17:01 -0400 Steve Best sfb...@us.ibm.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:30 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote: Hi Steve, On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:58 -0400, Steve Best wrote: +/* + * devmem_is_allowed() checks to see if /dev/mem access to a certain address + *

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: add hypervisor config entries to corenet_smp_defconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Timur Tabi
CONFIG_PPC_EPAPR_HV_BYTECHAN adds support for the Freescale hypervisor byte channel tty driver. CONFIG_VIRT_DRIVERS and CONFIG_FSL_HV_MANAGER add support for the Freescale hypervisor management driver. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com ---

[RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Ralf Baechle
The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies: depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \ (!M68K || ISA) !MN10300 !AVR32 !BLACKFIN This isn't just ugly - it also almost certainly describes the

Re: [PATCH 00/15] Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4

2011-06-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Joakim, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very tricky to use these insns. Also the

Re: Mapping an executable page

2011-06-14 Thread Timur Tabi
Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: * However, if you jump to an address in that page, you'll have to make sure that the entire code that executes is mapped (make map_size large enough). Well, that seems obvious. * When that range spanned multiple pages, I faced the issue of only one page being

Re: Mapping an executable page

2011-06-14 Thread Timur Tabi
Timur Tabi wrote: Hmmm I find that surprising. Memory allocated via ioremap() is supposed to be available in interrupt handlers, where TLB mappings can't be created on-the-fly. I'm not sure that your observation is correct. Ok, it turns out I'm wrong. As long as the page is in the

Re: Mapping an executable page

2011-06-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:31 +0200 Thomas De Schampheleire patrickdepinguin+linux...@gmail.com wrote: * Therefore, to make sure that the mapping I intended with __ioremap() is actually reflected in the TLB tables, I added dummy reads of each page in the TLB, prior to jumping to the boot code,

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 21:08:50 Ralf Baechle wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 9adc278..2968751f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config ARM select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO select HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA select

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 21:08, Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org wrote: The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies:       depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \               (!M68K || ISA) !MN10300 !AVR32

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 06/14/2011 12:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies: depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \ (!M68K || ISA) !MN10300 !AVR32 !BLACKFIN This isn't

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 22:25:46 H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/14/2011 12:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies: depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \

RE: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Luck, Tony
diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig index 38280ef..849805a 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Timur Tabi
The Freescale hypervisor does not allow guests to write to the timebase registers (virtualizing the timebase register was deemed too complicated), so don't try to synchronize the timebase registers when we're running under the hypervisor. This typically happens when kexec support is enabled.

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:04:33 -0500 Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote: The Freescale hypervisor does not allow guests to write to the timebase registers (virtualizing the timebase register was deemed too complicated), so don't try to synchronize the timebase registers when we're running

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Timur Tabi
Scott Wood wrote: FWIW, it's not supported under KVM either -- though we don't support an SMP guest under KVM yet, and KVM silently ignores it rather than logs errors as the FSL HV does. Does KVM set the root compatible to fsl,P4080DS-hv? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:25:46PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/14/2011 12:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies: depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:26 -0500 Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote: Scott Wood wrote: FWIW, it's not supported under KVM either -- though we don't support an SMP guest under KVM yet, and KVM silently ignores it rather than logs errors as the FSL HV does. Does KVM set the root

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Guan Xuetao
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:08 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to describe it's architecture dependencies: depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) !SPARC32 !M32R !FRV \ (!M68K || ISA) !MN10300 !AVR32 !BLACKFIN

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 18:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:26 -0500 Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote: Scott Wood wrote: FWIW, it's not supported under KVM either -- though we don't support an SMP guest under KVM yet, and KVM silently ignores it rather than

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: We might want to generically have a CPU feature bit indicating we are running in guest vs. HV mode. I know Paulus is planning to introduce one so you may want to sync with him. Are you talking about CPU_FTR_HVMODE_206? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor

2011-06-14 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 02:10 +, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: We might want to generically have a CPU feature bit indicating we are running in guest vs. HV mode. I know Paulus is planning to introduce one so you may want to sync with him. Are you talking about

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test matrix for no good reason. I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 06/14/2011 02:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Why on earth restrict it like that? It's just a device driver, like more or less any other device driver... I'd say any other classic ISA/PC driver, including floppy, gameport or serial-8250. One problem with these is that we never fully worked

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig index 38280ef..849805a 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG select

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:18:36AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test matrix for no good reason.

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

2011-06-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 06/14/2011 09:40 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:18:36AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates