On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:48:20PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> arch_setup_msi_irqs() hook can only be called from the generic
> MSI code which ensures correct MSI type parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci.c |2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+),
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:48:36AM +0800, Rui Xiang wrote:
> This patchset implements an accessor functions to set uid/gid
> in inode struct. Just finish code clean up.
Why?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 01:46:57PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> lock_device_hotplug() serializes CPU & Memory online/offline and hotplug
> operations. However, this lock is not held in the debug interfaces below
> that initiate CPU online/offline operations.
>
> - _debug_hotplug_cpu(), cpu0 hotplu
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:00:05AM -0500, Robert Jennings wrote:
> When an associativity level change is found for one thread, the
> siblings threads need to be updated as well. This is done today
> for PRRN in stage_topology_update() but is missing for VPHN in
> update_cpu_associativity_changes_m
Ben,
Why do I have 21 patches from you marked for -stable trees in the
3.11-rc1 merge window, like the one quoted below? All of these look
serious enough that they should have gone into the 3.10-rc releases,
especially as the date of when they were submitted gave you plenty of
time to get them me
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:49:34PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
>
> Commit 7122b7bc1757682049780179d7c216dd1c83 upstream.
>
> The following commit breaks numa distance setup for old powerpc
> systems that use form0 encoding in device tree.
>
> commit 41eab6
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 06:17:40PM +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> From: Ian Munsie
>
> If a doorbell IPI comes in while a thread is in nap power saving, the
> doorbell interrupt won't be replayed by the hardware since it is edge
> sensitive. Currently we are not replaying these interrupts in software
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:11:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 04, 2013 04:04:47 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:52:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > You'd probably never try to hot-remove a disk before unmounting
> >
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:52:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You'd probably never try to hot-remove a disk before unmounting filesystems
> mounted from it or failing it as a RAID component and nobody sane wants the
> kernel to do things like that automatically when the user presses the ejec
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 04, 2013 04:48:10 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Yes, but those are just remove events and we can only see how
>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Yes, but those are just remove events and we can only see how destructive
> > they
> > were after the removal. The point is to be able to figure out whether or
> > not
> > we *want* to do the removal in the first place.
> >
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:28:09PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 16:01 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:40:10PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 07:30 +, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:3
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:18:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, February 02, 2013 09:15:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 02, 2013 03:58:01 PM Greg KH wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > > I know it's more complicated with these
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, February 02, 2013 03:58:01 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:12:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 01, 2013 08:23:12 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:40:10PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 07:30 +0000, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > This is already done for PCI host bridges and platform devices and I
> > don't
>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:12:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 01, 2013 08:23:12 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:54:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > But, again, I'm going to ask why you aren't using t
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> This is already done for PCI host bridges and platform devices and I don't
> > see why we can't do that for the other types of devices too.
> >
> > The only missing piece I see is a way to handle the "eject" problem, i.e.
> > when we t
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:54:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > But, again, I'm going to ask why you aren't using the existing cpu /
> > > memory / bridge / node devices that we have in the kernel. Please use
> > > them, or give me a _really_ good reason why they will not work.
> >
> > W
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:15:12PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > Please make it a "real" pointer, and not a void *, those shouldn't be
> > used at all if possible.
>
> How about changing the "void *handle" to acpi_dev_node below?
>
>struct acpi_dev_nodeacpi_node;
>
> Basically, it has
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:40:19PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> +/*
> + * Hot-plug device information
> + */
Again, stop it with the "generic" hotplug term here, and everywhere
else. You are doing a very _specific_ type of hotplug devices, so spell
it out. We've worked hard to hotplug _everything_
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:40:21PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Added sys_hotplug.c, which is the system device hotplug framework code.
>
> shp_register_handler() allows modules to register their hotplug handlers
> to the framework. shp_submit_req() provides the interface to submit
> a hotplug or o
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:40:19PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Added include/linux/sys_hotplug.h, which defines the system device
> hotplug framework interfaces used by the framework itself and
> handlers.
>
> The order values define the calling sequence of handlers. For add
> execute, the orderin
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:21:30PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 20:07 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:42:09 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 08:53:53 AM T
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:02:04PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 19:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 14, 2013 08:33:48 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 22:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 04:40:19 PM
gt; >
> > - generic and POWER-specific perf events in /sys/devices/cpu/events/
> > - perf event config format in /sys/devices/cpu/format/event
> >
> > Document the format of these files which would become part of the ABI.
> >
> > Changelog[v3]:
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:07:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:42:09 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 08:53:53 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 22:25 +0100, R
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:08:35PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some recent patch has caused fsl_mxc_udc.c driver to fail compilation
> because it can't find anymore.
>
> I would like this to be fixed still during this -rc cycle.
Me too, who's sending a patch? :)
_
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:28:49PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> [PATCH 3/5] perf/POWER7: Make generic event translations available in sysfs
>
> Make the generic perf events in POWER7 available via sysfs.
>
> $ ls /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events
> branch-instructions
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:40:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > No, as there will not be any discarded sections anymore because
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is always enabled. We will just delete this whole
> > #if/#endif s
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:06:35AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:22:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:44:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:20:05PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:44:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:20:05PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
> > needed.
>
> Erm, I don't understand. __devexit_p is defined also for modules not
> only f
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 07:48:17AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 07:09 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > So who's merging it ?
> >
> > Give me a chance to at least wake up please :)
>
> Sure ;-) Just asking since I'm about to coo
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:47:59PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 10:45 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> > > This fixes it by removing the extra kref_put() and tty_kref_put() calls.
> >
> > Oh yeah. Thanks.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Slaby
>
> So who's merging it ?
Give
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:44:19PM +, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
> > Sent: 2012年9月22日 22:49
> > To: Kumar Gala
> > Cc: Liu Shengzhou-B36685; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:39:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:52:39PM +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> >> when missing USB PHY clock, kernel booting up will hang during USB
> >> init
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:52:39PM +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> when missing USB PHY clock, kernel booting up will hang during USB
> initialization. We should check USBGP[PHY_CLK_VALID] bit to avoid
> CPU hanging in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
> ---
> v3 change: no check for UTMI
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:35:09AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>
> > when missing USB PHY clock, kernel booting up will hang during USB
> > initialization. We should check USBGP[PHY_CLK_VALID] bit to avoid
> > CPU hanging in this case.
> >
> > S
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:13:19PM +, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
> > > 1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the
> > framework
> > >is pretty useless.
> > > [Sandeep] We do have a test client
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
> 1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the framework
>is pretty useless.
> [Sandeep] We do have a test client but not good enough to be pushed in
> open source, should we add it to documentation??
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:10:48AM +, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> > bounces+poonam.aggrwal=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Greg
> > KH
> > Sent: Friday,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:35:38PM +0530, sand...@freescale.com wrote:
> +static struct kobj_type tdm_type = {
> + .sysfs_ops = &tdm_ops,
> + .default_attrs = tdm_attr,
> +};
Ah, also, as per the documentation in the kernel (go look, it's there),
I now get to publicly mock you for ignoring
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:35:38PM +0530, sand...@freescale.com wrote:
> +/* Data structures required for sysfs */
> +static struct tdm_sysfs attr = {
> + .attr.name = "use_latest_data",
> + .attr.mode = 0664,
> + .cmd_type = TDM_LATEST_DATA,
> +};
What is this for?
> +int tdm_sysfs_i
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:53:03PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>
> Add Synopsys Design Ware core register definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah
> Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
> Signed-off-by: Fushen Chen
> Signed-off-by: Mark Miesfeld
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc/regs.h | 1326
> +
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:45:50PM -0600, Anthony Foiani wrote:
> I could try the latest kernels, but due to our vendor not upstreaming
> their patches, there could be some pain in that transition.
I would push back on that vendor, as this is their support issue, not
ours :)
Seriously, that's the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:50:27PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 01:53 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:06:30 +1100
> >
> > > This makes vio_register_driver() get the module owner & name at compile
> > > time
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:57:30PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> +int __vio_register_driver(struct vio_driver *viodrv, struct module *owner,
> + const char *mod_name)
> {
> viodrv->driver.bus = &vio_bus_type;
> + viodrv->driver.name = viodrv->name;
> + vi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:41:08PM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> +static int nx_register_algs(void)
> +{
> + int rc = -1;
> +
> + if (nx_driver.of.flags != NX_OF_FLAG_MASK_READY)
> + goto out;
> +
> + memset(&nx_driver.stats, 0, sizeof(struct nx_stats));
> +
> + rc = nx_sys
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:41:20PM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> These routines add sysfs files supporting the Power7+ in-Nest encryption
> accelerator driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Yoder
> ---
> Documentation/powerpc/pfo-nx-crypto.txt | 52
Please put sysfs file information in Documen
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:52:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in
> drivers/char/viotape.c between commit ba7a4822b48f ("powerpc: Remove some
> of the legacy iSeries specific device drivers") from the powerpc tree and
>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:16:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> so remove the code that tests for it.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> ---
> drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_vio.c |4
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Greg, it is probably easi
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> drivers/base/driver.c between commit fcd6f7620202 ("driver-core: remove
> legacy iSeries hack") from the powerpc tree and commit 9875bb480cc8
> ("El
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 05:05:07PM +0800, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui
> ---
> include/linux/pci_ids.h |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index 31d77af..8f026c0 100644
> --- a/incl
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:39:15PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:02 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> > If USB UTMI PHY is not enable, writing to portsc register will lead to
> > kernel hang during boot up.
>
> Thanks, I'll try that tomorrow.
>
> Greg, you're picking
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:39:48PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 02-02-2012 7:23, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>
> >when missing USB PHY clock, kernel booting up will halt during USB
> >initialization. We should check USBGP[PHY_CLK_VALID] bit to avoid
> >CPU hang in this case.
>
> >Signe
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c between commit 595fe91447b0 ("powerpc: Export
> PIR data through sysfs") from the powerpc tree and commits 8a25a2fd126c
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:39:57PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> This is the Freescale hardware bug fix which turned into a
> six-pack of 8250 updates. This is exactly what was posted
> in the v2 review, with just Alan's ack added[1]. Since nobody
> else has had any follow-on comme
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:19:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:30:12 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:13:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:48:06 +0200 Greg
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:13:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:48:06 +0200 Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:30:08AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Hey Miche.
> > >
> > > The git
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:50:29AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > For some devices, the default behavior of pgprot_noncached() is not
> > appropriate for all of its mappable regions. This provides a means for
> > the kernel side of the U
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:50:30AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> ---
> drivers/uio/uio_dpa.c | 200
> +
> 1 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_dpa.c
You do realize this does not build, right?
thank
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
> Greg,
>
> <
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > >
> > > On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > From: Kai Jiang
> >
> > To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> > extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:24:21AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
> Interrupt handler in MPC8xxx GPIO driver is missing the call
> to PIC EOI (end of interrupt) handler. As a result, at least
> on 85XX systems, GPIO interrupt is delivered only once. This
> patch adds the missing EOI call. Tested on c
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:15:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This patch doesn't apply at all to my tty tree, what was it made
> > against?
>
> An internal repository that supposed to be in-sync with the latest and
> greatest.
>
> What'
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 04:04:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang
> > Acked-by: Tobias Klauser
> > ---
> > driv
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:26:57PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The ePAPR hypervisor byte channel console driver only supports one byte
> channel as a console, and the byte channel handle is stored in a global
> variable. It doesn't make any sense to pass that handle as a parameter
> to the console
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang
> Acked-by: Tobias Klauser
> ---
> drivers/tty/amiserial.c |2 +-
> drivers/tty/cyclades.c |2 +-
> drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_irq.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:01:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got conflicts in
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/udbg.h and arch/powerpc/kernel/udbg.c between
> commit c26afe9e8591 ("powerpc/ps3: Add gelic udbg driver") from the
> powerpc tree a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:26:15AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> The sysfs memory probe interface allows unaligned regions
> to be added:
>
> # echo 0xff > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
>
> # cat /proc/iomem
> 00ff-01fe : System RAM
> 01ff-02fe : System RAM
> 02ff
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:19:17PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:49PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >> There are some DWC OTG parameters which might be passed by a platform.
> >> Declara
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:18:12PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:29:21AM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
> >> <-Original Message-
> >>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> From: Tirumala Marri
>
> Add Synopsys Design Ware core register definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
> Signed-off-by: Fushen Chen
> Signed-off-by: Mark Miesfeld
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand
> ---
> drivers/usb/
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:29:21AM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
> <-Original Message-
> mailto:pratyush.an...@st.com]
> <
><
>
> <---
> < include/linux/usb/dwc_otg.h | 274
>
> [Tirumala Marri] I am not sure how to separate your changes. But we need
> More time as our initial
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:49PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> There are some DWC OTG parameters which might be passed by a platform.
> Declaration for structure of those parameters have been provided in this
> include file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand
> ---
> include/linux/usb/dwc_otg.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:51:20PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > But don't you really want this type of check at runtime? What happens
> > if you load this driver on a machine that is not a guest? Will things
> > break? Shouldn't you still refuse t
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:02:01PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > tested doesn't mean that it shouldn't still build properly for other
> > platforms, right?
>
> The problem is the dependency on MSR_GS, which is defined only for Book-E
> PowerPC
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:20:45AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The Kconfig for the ePAPR hypervisor byte channel driver has a "depends on
> PPC",
> which means it would compile on all PowerPC platforms, even though it's
> only been tested on Freescale platforms. Change the Kconfig to depend on
> F
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:32:25AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The ePAPR embedded hypervisor specification provides an API for "byte
> channels", which are serial-like virtual devices for sending and receiving
> streams of bytes. This driver provides Linux kernel support for byte
> channels via thr
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:18:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c: In function 'udbg_init_ehv_bc':
> drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c:230:18: error: 'MSR_GS' un
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:15:47PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Doesn't apply at all to the tty-next tree, so I can't apply it here :(
>
> Um, where exactly is the tty-next tree? The only thing I see that looks like
> it
> is this:
>
> git:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:34:52AM -, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The ePAPR embedded hypervisor specification provides an API for "byte
> channels", which are serial-like virtual devices for sending and receiving
> streams of bytes. This driver provides Linux kernel support for byte
> channels via thr
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:00:41PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On some architectures we need to setup pdev_archdata before we add the
> device. Waiting til a bus_notifier is too late since we might need the
> pdev_archdata in the bus notifier. One example is setting up of dma_mask
> pointers such
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:55:44AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:33:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On some architectures we need to setup pdev_archdata before we add the
> >> device.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:33:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On some architectures we need to setup pdev_archdata before we add the
> device. Waiting til a bus_notifier is too late since we might need the
> pdev_archdata in the bus notifier. One example is setting up of dma_mask
> pointers such
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Milton Miller
commit 5db1256a5131d3b133946fa02ac9770a784e6eb2 upstream.
Move the smp_rmb after cpu_relax loop in read_seqlock and add
ACCESS_ONCE to make sure the test and return are consi
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Milton Miller
commit 5db1256a5131d3b133946fa02ac9770a784e6eb2 upstream.
Move the smp_rmb after cpu_relax loop in read_seqlock and add
ACCESS_ONCE to make sure the test and return are consi
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:18:28PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > More importantly, the code you have chose (0) conflicts with existing
> > drivers
> > (frame buffer, scsi and wavefront among others). Please chose a free one and
> > add it to Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt in the same patch.
>
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:26:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Backport upstream commit 6de06f313a65d0ec
>
> Commit fa3f82c8bb7acb ("powerpc/smp: soft-replugged CPUs must go back to
> start_secondary") introduced start_secondary_resume to head_32.S, however
> it uses a 64-bit instruction which
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:10:45PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:41 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 00:00 +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 May 2011 11:55:14 +0400
> > > Andrey Gusev wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > > A
2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
Content-Length: 2553
Lines: 71
From: Milton Miller
commit 5db1256a5131d3b133946fa02ac9770a784e6eb2 upstream.
Move the smp_rmb after cpu_relax loop in read_seqlock and add
ACCESS_ONCE to make sure
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Milton Miller
commit 5db1256a5131d3b133946fa02ac9770a784e6eb2 upstream.
Move the smp_rmb after cpu_relax loop in read_seqlock and add
ACCESS_ONCE to make sure the test and return are consist
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:22:25PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Commit 69e3cea8d5fd526 introduced start_secondary_resume to misc_32.S,
> however it uses a 64-bit instruction which is not valid on 32-bit
> platforms. Use 'stw' instead.
>
> Reported-by: Richard Cochran
> Tested-by: Richard Cochran
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Frederic Weisbecker
commit 925f83c085e1bb08435556c5b4844a60de002e31 upstream.
We make use of ptrace_get_breakpoints() / ptrace_put_breakpoints() to
protect ptrace_set_debugreg() even if CONF
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:54:03AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Depends if the functionality is useful in your environment or not
>
> It is, but I'd like to add it later so that I can make the 2.6.40 window (if
> it
> isn't already too late).
It's too late, it needed to be in linux-next _before_
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> +/*
> + * The udbg subsystem calls this function to display a single character.
> + * We convert CR to a CR/LF.
> + */
> +static void ehv_bc_udbg_putc(char c)
> +{
> + if (c == '\n')
> + byte_channel_spin_send('\r');
> +
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:20:02PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
> commit: 925f83c085e1bb08435556c5b4844a60de002e31
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:53:18 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] hw_breakpoints, powerpc: Fix CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> off-case in ptrace_set_debugreg()
>
>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:01:47PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 27 Apr 2011 [14:31:29], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:36:10 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Wed) 20 Apr 2011 [07:34:35], Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Care to either create this patc
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:03:30PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 28 Mar 2011 [11:52:05], Milton Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 about 14:17:14 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Thu) 24 Mar 2011 [08:58:04], Milton Miller wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:29:58 -, Amit Shah wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:01:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following series of patches fixes bugs related to the introduction
> of struct syscore_ops later in this cycle, replaces sysdev suspend/resume
> operations in all of the architectures still using them with struct
> sy
301 - 400 of 553 matches
Mail list logo
