Only the swap function cares about the ACCESSED bit in
the pte. Do not waste cycles updateting ACCESSED when swap
is not compiled into the kernel.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/
This avoids storing these registers in memory.
CPU6 errata will still use the old way.
Remove some G2 leftover accesses from 2.4
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 49 +--
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/h
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/02/26 20:50:18:
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:29:40AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This removes a couple of insn's from the TLB Miss
> > handlers whithout changing functionality.
> > ---
>
> Did a quick test of the patchset, se
Kumar Gala wrote on 2010/02/26 21:10:31:
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:29 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> >li r11, 0x00f0
> > - rlwimi r10, r11, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
> > + rlwimi r10, r11, 0, 0x07f8 /* Set 24-27, clear 21-23,28 */
uot; these patches too?
Joakim Tjernlund (4):
8xx: Optimze TLB Miss handlers
8xx: Avoid testing for kernel space in ITLB Miss.
8xx: Don't touch ACCESSED when no SWAP.
8xx: Use SPRG2 and DAR registers to stash r11 and cr.
arch/powerpc/kernel/he
Only modules will cause ITLB Misses as we always pin
the first 8MB of kernel memory.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
This removes a couple of insn's from the TLB Miss
handlers whithout changing functionality.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 11 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/k
Only the swap function cares about the ACCESSED bit in
the pte. Do not waste cycles updateting ACCESSED when swap
is not compiled into the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
This avoids storing these registers in memory.
CPU6 errata will still use the old way.
Remove some G2 leftover accesses from 2.4
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 49 +--
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/03 09:02:47:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> I tried your 4 patches on a MPC855M based system:
Thanks a lot for testing this for me!
>
> -bash-3.2# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : 8xx
> clock : 66.00MHz
> revision: 0.0 (pvr
>
> Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/03 09:02:47:
> >
> > Hello Joakim,
> >
> > I tried your 4 patches on a MPC855M based system:
>
> Thanks a lot for testing this for me!
>
> >
> > -bash-3.2# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > processor : 0
> > cpu : 8xx
> > clock : 66.00MHz
> >
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/03 11:10:10:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/03 09:02:47:
> [...]
> >> Here the results:
> >> (The first 4 rows are the results for the kernel without your patches,
> &
Got this OOPS a few times after coldstarting out
board a few times:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for unknown fault
Faulting instruction address: 0xc020e2b4
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
TMCUTU
Modules linked in:
NIP: c020e2b4 LR: c020e274 CTR:
REGS: c7a41b40 TRA
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/03/04 13:16:56:
> From: Wolfgang Denk
> To: h...@denx.de
> Cc: Joakim Tjernlund , Klaus-Jürgen
> , linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org, Scott Wood
>
> Date: 2010/03/04 13:17
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss code.
>
> Dear Heiko,
>
>
>
> Got this OOPS a few times after coldstarting out
> board a few times:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for unknown fault
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc020e2b4
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> TMCUTU
> Modules linked in:
> NIP: c020e2b4 LR: c020e274 CTR: 000
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/04 17:30:07:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/03/04 13:16:56:
> >> From: Wolfgang Denk
> >> To: h...@denx.de
> >> Cc: Joakim Tjernlund , Klaus-Jürgen
> >> , linuxp
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/04 17:30:07:
> From: Heiko Schocher
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk , Klaus-Jürgen ,
> linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org, Scott Wood
> Date: 2010/03/04 17:30
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss code.
>
> Hello Joakim,
&g
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/08 08:46:29:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> [...]
> > What would be interesting is to skip patch 3 and turn off
> > MODULES add PIN_TLB and compare that against your unpatched .33 but
> > with MODULES off and PIN_T
Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/08 10:06:39:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Heiko Schocher wrote on 2010/03/08 08:46:29:
> >> Hello Joakim,
> >>
> >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> What would be int
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote on 2010/03/16 22:19:36:
>
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > + /* Only modules will cause ITLB Misses as we always
> > +* pin the first 8MB of kernel memory */
> >
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote on 2010/03/16 22:20:52:
>
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Only the swap function cares about the ACCESSED bit in
> > the pte. Do not waste cycles updateting ACCESSED when swap
> > is not compiled into the
>
> I'm tracking a problem that's leading me through DSI and DTLB miss
> exceptions on an MPC8347 (e300c1 core), and I've come across an oddity
> that I'm hoping someone can explain.
>
> When a DTLB Miss exception can't find a PTE for the virtual address being
> written/read, it dummies up the SPRs
Stefan Roese wrote on 2011/04/13 16:32:21:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that ftrace doesn't seem to work on MPC8xx. I'm trying to use it on
> an MPC855T board, but ftrace oopses upon startup:
>
> [0.028785] ftrace: allocating 10312 entries in 31 pages
> [0.038594] [ cut here ]
Stefan Roese wrote on 2011/04/13 17:21:33:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Wednesday 13 April 2011 16:58:21 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > This is on a 2.6.38 kernel (2.6.32 fails too). Debugging shows that
> > > __copy_tofrom_user() fails with return code 4 (calle
Stefan Roese wrote on 2011/04/14 17:59:30:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Wednesday 13 April 2011 17:38:03 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > How big was the size to copy_tofrom_user()? Did it mange to copy
> > > > any bytes?
> > >
> > > The size
>
> Stefan Roese wrote on 2011/04/14 17:59:30:
> >
> > Hi Joakim,
> >
> > On Wednesday 13 April 2011 17:38:03 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > > How big was the size to copy_tofrom_user()? Did it mange to copy
> > > > > any bytes?
>
Stefan Roese wrote on 2011/04/15 09:22:42:
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 21:21:23 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > hmm, I guess 8xx really maps kernel RO as RO :) Try
> > >
> > > changing in pte-8xx.h:
> > > - #define _PAGE_KERNEL_RO (_
Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
kernel instruction TLB space.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |9 +
1
This is an assembler version to fixup DAR not being set
by dcbX, icbi instructions. There are two versions, one
uses selfmodifing code, the other uses a
jump table but is much bigger(default).
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 149
dcbz, dcbf, dcbi, dcbst and icbi do not set DAR when they
cause a DTLB Error. Dectect this by tagging DAR with 0x00f0
at every exception exit that modifies DAR.
This also fixes MachineCheck to pass DAR and DSISR as well.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 18
space.
- Free up 2 SW TLB bits in the linux pte(add back _PAGE_WRITETHRU ?)
- kernel RO/user NA support. Not sure this is really needed, would save
a few insn if not required.
Cons:
- A few more instructions in the DTLB Miss routine.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel
only DTLB Miss did set this bit, DTLB Error needs too otherwise
the setting is lost when the page becomes dirty.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch
Only update pte w.r.t ACCESSED if it isn't already set
Wrap ACCESSED with #ifndef NO_SWAP for too ease optimization.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8x
8xx sometimes need to load a invalid/non-present TLBs in
it DTLB asm handler.
These must be invalidated separately as 8xx MMU don't.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arc
branch to common code in DTLB Miss instead.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 23 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index f4c3f41..44e79b3 100644
--- a
very found during development.
I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
Addendum:
I have now ported our 8xx custom board to 2.4.37.11 and
tested these patches there.
Joakim Tjernlund (15):
8xx: Use a macro to simpliy
Don't check for kernel space if no modules.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index a4290b5..7f9e647 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/k
Use the PTE #defines where possible instead of
hardcoded constants.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index d701542..a4290b5
8xx has not had WRITETHRU due to lack of bits in the pte.
After the recent rewrite of the 8xx TLB code, there are
two bits left. Use one of them to WRITETHRU.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |8
include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h |5 +++--
2 files changed
The wrong register was loaded into MD_RPN.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index b3aff21..9d8a1b5 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel
Now that 8xx can fixup dcbX instructions, start using them
where possible like every other PowerPc arch do.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S | 18 --
arch/ppc/lib/string.S | 17 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 35 deletions
DTLB Error needs to adjust the HW PTE bits as DTLB Miss
does.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index a29a011..d701542 100644
--- a
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 84 +++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index f9a30f3..ba05a57 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel
Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 18:06:45:
>
>
> Hi Joakim.
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
> > a rfi. .
>
> I'm going to argue we can easily visually inspect for
Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 18:11:51:
>
>
> Hi Joakim.
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
>
> Thanks
Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 20:11:18:
>
>
> Hi Joakim.
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > I don't have a mpc850, do you?
>
> I have to say I do :-)
Good, you get to beat the crap out of it then :)
>
> > Probably but tha
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/06/14 20:00:09:
> From: Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode
>
> Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 18:06:45:
> >
> >
> > Hi Joakim.
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > Various kerne
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/06/14 21:31:06:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > error
Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 20:11:18:
>
> Hi Joakim.
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > I don't have a mpc850, do you?
>
> I have to say I do :-)
>
> > Probably but that is another matter. You could continue with that
&
PPC __arch_swab32 and __arch_swab16 generates non optimal code.
It doesn't schedule very well, need to copy its input register and
and swab16 needs an extra insn to clear its upper bits. I have improved
these functions(see my__xx). Any problem with the new asm? If
not I will send a patch.
Below s
Andreas Schwab wrote on 2011/08/11 10:45:42:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>
> > unsigned short my__arch_swab16(unsigned short value)
> > {
> >__asm__("rlwimi %0,%0,16,0x00ff"
> > : "+r" (value));
>
> You are creating a v
"David Laight" wrote on 2011/08/11 10:56:26:
>
> > Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> >
> > > unsigned short my__arch_swab16(unsigned short value)
> > > {
> > >__asm__("rlwimi %0,%0,16,0x00ff"
> > > : "+r" (
"David Laight" wrote on 2011/08/11 11:29:33:
>
>
> > > Which is a problem because the compiler could schedule
> > > it be written back to real memory between the instructions.
> >
> > It can? There is no memory here, just registers. Even if it
> > is written to memory, how would that affect the re
QE_General4 should only round up the divisor iff divisor is > 3.
Rounding up lower divisors makes the error too big, causing USB
on MPC832x to fail.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/a
MPC832x does not have enough MURAM to do fixed MURAM allocation.
Change to dynamic allocation.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 2011/08/23 15:02:53:
> From: Anton Vorontsov
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Date: 2011/08/23 15:02
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: Allocate pram dynamically.
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:38:41PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlu
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linux-mtd-boun...@lists.infradead.org
> > [mailto:linux-mtd-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
> > Steve Deiters
> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:02 PM
> > To: linux-...@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: RE: JFFS2 corruption when mounting filesyst
> From: Shawn Jin
>
> I'm porting a mpc870 board to the powerpc arch. The base is the
> adder-875 board. My first try to boot the cuImage.my870 is
> experiencing a machine check. And I have no clue where to look. Any
> help?
>
> => bootm 100
> ## Booting image at 0100 ...
>Image Name:
Noticed that there is a CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR knob for HIGH_RES on 32 bit
which is off for ppc. I wonder not 64 bit math on 32 bit arch is good
enough on ppc?
Jocke
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.or
>
> This patch applies to 2.6.34.7. It also applies to 2.6.35.4 althought
> part of it is already included in 2.6.35.4
> It fixed a problem with spi_mpc8xxx.c when transmitting or receiving
> data bigger than PAGE_SIZE when doing a read only or write only operation
> It also fixed an issue with t
g
> only more than PAGE_SIZE bytes
> Sent by: linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode...@lists.ozlabs.org
>
> This patch applies to 2.6.34.7 and 2.6.35.4
> It fixes an issue when sending only or receiving only more than PAGE_SIZE
> bytes
>
> Signed-off-by: chr
linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode...@lists.ozlabs.org
>
> This patch applies to 2.6.34.7 (already included in 2.6.35.4)
> It fixes an issue when sending only or receiving only (mspi->tx-dma was reset
> as when no tx_buf is defined, tx_dma is 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: chr
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Cc: John Rigby
> ---
> This patch is NOT intended for inclusion into mainline, but rather a
> request for help. For some reason which I don't understand yet, the
> Ethernet interface on the ARIA board does not work in the default
> configura
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 07/05/2009 11:19:48:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
you wrote:
> >
> > Just a stab in the dark: Perhaps the fec->fecp->fec_mii_speed field is
> > misaligned or is 16 bits ?
>
> Good idea. The RM documents the regist
>
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:03AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >
> >> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> >> RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
> >> of reads.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Could you elaborate a bit,
Esben Haabendal wrote on 14/05/2009 12:17:48:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The problem is that after the STOP condition, the following i2c_msg will be
> >> attempted with a repeated START, which according to specifica
Esben Haabendal wrote on 15/05/2009 12:18:39:
>
> I have now spent a few hours trying a lot of different paths to fix
> this approach, but I simply cannot find a way to get i2c read to work
> without a trailing STOP condition with this controller.
I found a bug which lets me remove the "fix" and
Esben Haabendal wrote on 15/05/2009 14:52:28:
>
> Your new patch also does not work.
>
> Have you tested it?
sure, works fine. I haven't stressed it too much though.
>
> I already tried something very much what you sent here, I believe the
> only difference was that I named the "last" variable "
linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode...@ozlabs.org wrote on
27/05/2009 07:08:07:
>
> Guys,
>
> The ucc_geth ethernet driver have dozens of strong sync read/write
> operation, such as in_be32/16/8, out_be32/16/8.
>
> all of them is sync read/write, it is very expensive for performance.
>
> This trivial patch changes memcpy_(to|from)io as to transfer as many
> 32-bit words as possible in 32-bit accesses (in the current solution,
> the last 32-bit word was transferred as 4 byte accesses).
>
> Signed-off-by: Albrecht Dreß
> ---
>
> diff -urpN -X linux-2.6.29.1.orig/Documentation/d
ne breaks (check
> @@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I
> would only test it and give a tested-by-tag if it doesn't break anything
> here. I think Joakim would be a good candidate for an acked-by .
It sure looks O
> Am 28.05.09 18:13 schrieb(en) Joakim Tjernlund:
> > hmm, these do look a bit unoptimal anyway. Any reason not to write
> > them something like below(written by me for uClibc long time ago).
> > You will have to add eieio()/sync
>
> No (and I wasn't aware of th
>
> Hi Jocke:
>
> Am 29.05.09 08:31 schrieb(en) Joakim Tjernlund:
> > > No (and I wasn't aware of the PPC pre-inc vs. post-inc stuff) - I
> > just
> >
> > I think this is true for most RISC based CPU's. It is a pity as
> > post ops a
There are out of tree boards that need this legacy support too.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
I hope this is OK. I just discovered that spi didn't work for
me in 2.6.30 and I have no time to work on coverting my boards.
I don't have a clue either on how to do that, any pointers
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 01/07/2009 23:12:12:
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:16:12PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > There are out of tree boards that need this legacy support too.
>
> Heh.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
> > ---
> > I hope this i
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears
> that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So here are the
> patches.
>
> Joakim, I think this is what you need.
Yes, it sure looks so :) I will have to look
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 13/07/2009 18:01:02:
>
> Anton Vorontsov wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears
> > that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 13/07/2009 19:34:55:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:01:02PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been sitting on these patche
-Anton Vorontsov skrev: -
>Till: Joakim Tjernlund
>Från: Anton Vorontsov
>Datum: 07/14/2009 00:20
>Kopia: David Brownell ,
>linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
>Ärende: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 13, 2009
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> [...]
> > >But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree.
> >
> > ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native
>
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 04/08/2009 16:22:50:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > [..
o.
Reviewed-by: Joakim Tjernlund
Jocke
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 24
> 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> index b8ca5b4
On Mon, 2023-02-27 at 14:48 -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:52 AM Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> >
> > [RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Remove some e300/MPC83xx evaluation platforms] On
> > 24/02/2023 (Fri 21:16) Leo Li wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 23:58 +, Chris Packham wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> On 1/09/20 6:14 pm, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Excerpts from
[SNIP]
> >
> > > Would you be able to ftrace the interrupt handler function and see if you
> > > can see a difference in number or timing of interrupts? I'm at a bit of
> > > a loss.
> >
> > I tried ftrace but I really wasn't sure what I was looking for.
> > Capturing a "bad" case was pretty tri
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 12:28 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> Excerpts from Chris Packham's message of September 14, 2020
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 11:04 +0200, nico.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> From: Nicolas VINCENT
>
> the i2c_ram structure is m
Embedded PPC CPU should send SIGBUS to user space when applicable.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 0381242920d9..12715d24141c
ping
Also Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 19:05 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Embedded PPC CPU should send SIGBUS to user space when applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 17 +
> 1 file chan
On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 11:57 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> > Embedded PPC CPU should send SIGBUS to user space when applicable.
>
> Yeah, but it's not clear that it's applicable in all cases.
>
> At least I need some rea
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> abs.org] On Behalf Of Vitaly Bordug
> Sent: den 6 december 2007 23:51
> To: Paul Mackerras
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not
> duplicate PHY layerfun
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:28 +0530, Aggrwal Poonam wrote:
> Hello All
>
> The TDM driver just now does not have a proper framework. Probably the
> interface cannot be generalised as such. Hence we could not decide
> whether it would be right to think of a TDM framework. Infact the
> interface this
Trying to use other UCC2 or UCC4 for ethernet instead of UCC3 makes MDIO
unusable. UCC2 can not find its PHY if not UCC3 is present too. Seems
like only UCC3 is able to drive the MDIO bus.
Jocke
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
http
Remove bogus UCC regs range test and correct
off by one error in call to ucc_set_qe_mux_mii_mng()
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I am not 100% sure this is the correct fix, please ACK or NACK
drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c | 26 +++---
1 files c
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 18:11 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Remove bogus UCC regs range test and correct
> off by one error in call to ucc_set_qe_mux_mii_mng()
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> I am not 100% sure this is the corr
No response yet, figured I should try here instead.
Jocke
Forwarded Message
From: Joakim Tjernlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Netdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Li Yang-r58472
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix ethernet multicast for u
> -Original Message-
> From: Li Yang-r58472 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 18 oktober 2007 16:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Netdev; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix ethernet multicast for ucc_geth.
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:53 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Jocke,
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:06:13 +0200, Tjernlund wrote:
> > While browsing the i2c-mpc.c driver I noticed some things that look odd
> > to me so I figured I report them. Could not find a maintainer in the
> > MAINTANERS file
> >
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abs.org] On Behalf Of Jean Delvare
> Sent: den 26 oktober 2007 11:53
> To: Tjernlund
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [i2c] i2c-mpc.c driver issues
>
> Hi Jocke,
>
> On Wed, 24 Oc
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 17:29 +0300, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> fixed-link says: register new "Fixed/emulated PHY", i.e. PHY that
> not connected to the real MDIO bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> Documentation/p
501 - 600 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
