On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:58:31 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/11, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > On 6/10/20 8:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > This is not consistent and this breaks
> > > > http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/user-regs-peekpoke
>
> this is 404.
Attaching the
On 06/11, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/20 8:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >looks like this patch was forgotten.
>
> yep, I missed this. But mpe did have comments for the patch.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/107
Yes, and I thought that I have replied... apparently not,
On 6/10/20 8:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Hi,
looks like this patch was forgotten.
yep, I missed this. But mpe did have comments for the patch.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/107
Maddy
Do you think this should be fixed or should we document that
PTRACE_GETREGS is not consistent with
Hi,
looks like this patch was forgotten.
Do you think this should be fixed or should we document that
PTRACE_GETREGS is not consistent with PTRACE_PEEKUSER on ppc64?
On 09/17, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I don't have a ppc machine, this patch wasn't even compile tested,
> could you please review?
I don't have a ppc machine, this patch wasn't even compile tested,
could you please review?
The commit a8a4b03ab95f ("powerpc: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in
ptrace & signals") changed ptrace_get_reg(PT_SOFTE) to report 0x1,
but PTRACE_GETREGS still copies pt_regs->softe as is.
This is not
