On 1/11/16 5:55 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
However, I do agree with the concerns raised by Peter and Adhemerval: glibc
should be in sync with the kernel by the time of the release in order to
guarantee both bits are reserved for the exact same goal and we should have
both
On 13 January 2016 03:39:17 GMT+11:00, Steven Munroe
wrote:
>On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 15:48 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 01/11/2016 02:55 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>> > "Carlos O'Donell" writes:
>> >
>> >> On 01/11/2016
On 01/12/2016 11:39 AM, Steven Munroe wrote:
>> That's the rule. There are no other discussions to be had.
>>
> Well is was posted to to powerpc next:
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e708c24cd01ce80b1609d8bacc
>
> We have agreement between the kernel and GLIBC (and the ABI).
>
> The issue is
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 15:48 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 02:55 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> > "Carlos O'Donell" writes:
> >
> >> On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> >>> Adhemerval Zanella
On 01/11/2016 02:55 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" writes:
>
>> On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>>> Adhemerval Zanella writes:
>>>
On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote:
Adhemerval Zanella writes:
> On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 11:25 -0200, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>>> Peter, this solves the issue you reported previously [1].
>>>
>>> [1]
On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella writes:
>
>> On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 11:25 -0200, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
Peter, this solves the issue you reported
"Carlos O'Donell" writes:
> On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>> Adhemerval Zanella writes:
>>
>>> On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 11:25 -0200, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho