On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:35:24 UTC, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
> system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
> addressable because it is allocated from memblock using
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mike Rapoport writes:
> > From: Mike Rapoport
> >
> > Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
> > system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
> > addressable
Mike Rapoport writes:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
> system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
> addressable because it is allocated from memblock using top-down mode.
>
> Force memblock to
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
> system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
> addressable because it is allocated from memblock
From: Mike Rapoport
Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
addressable because it is allocated from memblock using top-down mode.
Force memblock to bottom-up mode before calling