* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-08-26 16:37:21]:
This patch creates arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c,
which implements the cpuidle infrastructure for pseries.
It implements a pseries_cpuidle_loop() which would be the main idle loop
called from cpu_idle(). It makes
* Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl [2009-08-26 13:27:18]:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:40 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
+void (*pm_idle)(void);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_idle);
Seriously.. this caused plenty problems over on x86 and you're doing the
exact same dumb thing?
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:40 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
+void (*pm_idle)(void);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_idle);
Seriously.. this caused plenty problems over on x86 and you're doing the
exact same dumb thing?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:02 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl [2009-08-26 13:27:18]:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:40 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
+void (*pm_idle)(void);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_idle);
Seriously.. this caused plenty problems over on
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:40 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
+void (*pm_idle)(void);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_idle);
Seriously.. this caused plenty problems over on x86 and you're doing the
exact same dumb thing?
I already said I didn't
