+static void __iomem *mpc83xx_pcie_remap_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int offset)
+{
+ struct pci_controller *hose = bus-sysdata;
+ struct mpc83xx_pcie *pcie = hose-dn-data;
+ u8 bus_no = bus-number - hose-first_busno;
+ u32
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
This patch makes the default install script (arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh)
copy the bootable image files into the install directory. Before this
patch only the vmlinux image file was
Hi all,
Thanks for the comments on the previous versions, and here is the
updated patch set to support PCI-E on MPC83xx boards.
Changes since v3:
- TAL register programming changed per new reference manual for 83xx
processors;
- dts files no longer specify config window in regs = . Instead,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:18:26PM +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
+static void __iomem *mpc83xx_pcie_remap_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int offset)
+{
+ struct pci_controller *hose = bus-sysdata;
+ struct mpc83xx_pcie *pcie = hose-dn-data;
+
This patch adds support for PCI-Express controllers as found on the
newer MPC83xx chips.
The work is loosely based on the Tony Li's patch[1], but unlike the
original patch, this patch implements sliding window for the Type 1
transactions using outbound window translations, so we don't have to
This patch adds pcie nodes to the appropriate dts files, plus adds
some probing code for the boards.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8315erdb.dts | 64 +
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts | 64
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:26:14AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I meant the official u-boot from denx.de vs the one FSL ships w/its
boards BSPs. The BSP u-boot has modifications that don't exist in
the denx.de u-boot (as the quality of the code is not up to open
source standards).
I
plz unsubscribe me
--
Regards
Nagaraju G
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hi all,
I got an assumption from the existing device trees that having 'simple-bus' in
the compatible property of a node means that all child nodes should be added as
of_platform_device in platform initialization phase. No matter it represents a
bus in common sense or not. Is this truly the
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
This patch makes the default install script (arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh)
copy the bootable image files
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:46:45AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
[...]
My statement was to convey that the kernel.org kernel should only
worry itself with the denx.de u-boot (w/regards to compatibility).
Why? Unless the BSP u-boots do something insane, I think we should try
to have the
Configuring a powerpc 32 bit kernel for both SMP and SUSPEND turns on
CPU_HOTPLUG to enable disable_nonboot_cpus to be called by the common
suspend code. Previously the definition of cpu_die for ppc32 was in
the powermac platform code, causing it to be undefined if that platform
as not selected.
Probe the new mdio node added by b31a1d8b. Fix kernel panic problem when
gianfar driver wants to get the of_platform_device of that mdio.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Please unsubscribe me from this list.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
I'll pick this up, but wondering about this patch vs Trent's changes
to remove this.
How is KVM on fsl-booke using this value?
- k
On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:57 AM, Liu Yu wrote:
Hi Kumar,
Can I get your ack?
So that I can submit this patch through KVM tree.
-Original Message-
From:
On Sunday 28 December 2008, malc wrote:
Now to the Christmas cheer, i've tried v2.6.28 and couldn't help but
notice that the problem is gone, bisecting v2.6.27 (which funnily i
had to mark good) to v2.6.28 (which has to be marked bad) wasn't fun
but eventually converged at
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:19 +0530, Chandru wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 03:06:07 Dave Hansen wrote:
When booted with crashkernel=2...@32m or any memory size less than
this, the system boots properly. The system comes up with two nodes
(0-256M and 256M-4GB). The crashkernel memory
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 03:45 +0300, malc wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 03:08 +0300, m...@pulsesoft.com wrote:
Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:04:45AM +0300,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:45:15AM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Steve DeLaney onramp...@yahoo.com wrote:
we are booting 2.6.26 on MPC8349-MITXE
do you need a device tree? this can be tftp loaded, or flashed in the board
and
cp.b from flash to
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:25:08AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Probe the new mdio node added by b31a1d8b. Fix kernel panic problem
when
gianfar driver wants to get the of_platform_device of that mdio.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:29:39AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
+compatible = fsl,mpc8315-pcie, fsl,mpc8314-pcie;
+reg = 0xe0009000 0x1000 0xb000 0x0100;
the size on the 0xb000 seems wrong
This is how FSL U-Boots configure the cfg window, and
Dear Stefan,
In message 200901051912.25874...@denx.de you wrote:
+ /* Write new configration */
+ out_8(hw-regs-mode, cs-mode);
+
+ /*
+ * Allow platform reduce the interrupt load on the CPU during SPI
+ * transfers. We do not target maximum performance, but rather allow
+
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:28:56AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:09 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I have a Sequoia board (440EPx) with kernel 2.6.27.9. I've recently
plugged in a PLX adapter board to convert one of the PCI connectors
on the Sequoia to PCIe.
When the kernel boots, I get the following error messages regarding
mem
This adds support for an EDAC memory controller adaptation driver for
the ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2 ECC controller realized in the AMCC PowerPC
405EX[r].
Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson gerick...@nuovations.com
---
At present, this driver has been developed and tested against the
controller realization in
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:09 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I have a Sequoia board (440EPx) with kernel 2.6.27.9. I've recently
plugged in a PLX adapter board to convert one of the PCI connectors
on the Sequoia to PCIe.
When the kernel boots, I get the following
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Kernel: 2.6.28; function: scan_OF_pci_childs; file: arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_32.c
Quoting from line 206 : 'some OFs create a parent node multifunc-device as a
fake root for all functions of a multi-function device. we go down
them as well.'
Function scan_OF_for_pci_dev (line 225) also needs to be
Hello Anton,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Anton Vorontsov
avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:45:15AM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Earlier release kernels booted for me, and I use the device tree
compiled from the device tree source that comes with the tree.
I
unsubscribe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
Hello Frank
Would you please unsubscribe me ?
regard yours
JeongIn.ChoiSamsungThalesCo.,Ltd.
S/W1Group
AdvancedTechnologyRDCenter
SAMSUNG THALES
CO., LTD.
Chang-Li 304, Namsa-Myun, Cheoin-Gu,
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST) David Miller da...@davemloft.net
wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100
These changes will avoid several warnings when we change u64 to unsigned
long long.
Also, ehea_driver_flags
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:09:01 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 21:51 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:17:30 +1100
ehea_plpar_hcall9() takes an unsigned long
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:59:51 +1100
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST) David Miller da...@davemloft.net
wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100
These changes will avoid
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:05:35 -0800 (PST) David Miller da...@davemloft.net
wrote:
Aha, yes the commit message fooled me :-) New patch is fine and
I'll toss this into net-2.6
I will try to do better in the future, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Milton you're amazing 3
This is going to take a while to test. I have to build a new source rpm
and push it to Peter, who is doing some work and I need him to have
working config the same as mine. I am build testing the patch in
parallel here.. maybe I will have a kernel tonight or maybe
Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent
out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage
their membership)?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
They should be mapped into PCI address space with the rest, you should
note though that a bunch of people have asked this a bunch of times and
the response is usually null.
If you want to output debugging info, try a serial port, or if you're
still at the point in boot where the OF is still
Please unsubscribe me from this list.
Original Message
Subject: unsubscribe
From: Leonid leo...@a-k-a.net
To: Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Date: 2009年1月6日 上午 02:03:55
Please unsubscribe me from this list.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:03:58 -0500
Matt Gessner mgess...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent
out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage
their membership)?
I am seeing them on other forums too. I am suspicious, but do
Sean MacLennan wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:03:58 -0500
Matt Gessner mgess...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent
out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage
their membership)?
I am seeing them on other forums
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:20:53PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:27:39PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
I got an assumption from the existing device trees that having
'simple-bus' in the compatible property of a node means that all child
nodes should be added as
From: Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:27:06 -0800
I expect they're all people, like myself, that have been bumped here
from the ppc_embedded list and aren't used to all the traffic.
This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers
from old
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
4xx PowerPC's.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker w...@reccoware.de
Acked-by: Josh Boyer
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:25 AM
To: Li Yang-R58472
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash
On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Probe the new
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:59:35 -0800 (PST) David Miller da...@davemloft.net
wrote:
This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers
from old lists to new ones created at vger.kernel.org
Everyone must go through the motions of adding themselves to the new
list.
David-
From: Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:27:06 -0800
I expect they're all people, like myself, that have been bumped here
from the ppc_embedded list and aren't used to all the traffic.
This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers
Another data point:
After I got resubscribed after the list merge I tried the list manager
to unsubscribe and it hasn't taken yet. I'll try again...
-- Ken
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
From: Jeff Brower jbro...@signalogic.com
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:28:46 -0600 (CST)
I completely disagree. I'm glad the embedded PC list owners were
thoughtful enough to migrate me to the new list.
At the very least I know that all of the folks asking to
be unsubscribed would likely take my
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hollis Blanchard
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:52 AM
To: Gala Kumar-B11780
Cc: Liu Yu-B13201; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Piepho Trent-B16872;
unsubscibe me ..
thanks
unsubscribe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
unsubscribe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
ehea_plpar_hcall9() takes an unsigned long array to return its results,
so change the arrays we pass to it to match. This is currently only
64 bit code, so the transformation is actually a noop, but because
ehea_plpar_hcall9() copies the values of registers into the array,
if this was ported to a
-Original Message-
From:
devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org
[mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.
org] On Behalf Of David Gibson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:43 AM
To: Wood Scott-B07421
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Li
Here is a complete startup log, with debug turned on as you requested.
This is still against 2.6.27.9, as it will take me a little time to
build 2.6.28. Hopefully, this log will be useful in the meantime.
Can you add debug to your kernel command line option or send the
output of the dmesg
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Li Yang le...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org
[mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.
org] On Behalf Of David Gibson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:43 AM
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Li Yang le...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org
* Milton Miller milt...@bga.com [2009-01-05 07:33:32]:
On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi Milton,
Thanks for the review comments, I am resending the patch with the
changes you have recommended.
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Better,
Sorry for resending the patch before taking care of the response.
Resending
the patch with changes made to other three drivers also.
Impact: Fix the VIOPATH dependency in the iSeries dependent drivers.
iSeries depend drivers build fails, when CONFIG_VIOPATH is disabled.
60 matches
Mail list logo
