Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:17:45 -0500 you wrote:
> This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
> where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
> would require major rework if this is
This is way to catch some cases of decrementer overflow, when the
decrementer has underflowed an odd number of times, while MSR[EE] was
disabled.
With a typical small decrementer, a timer that fires when MSR[EE] is
disabled will be "lost" if MSR[EE] remains disabled for between 4.3 and
8.6
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:17:45 -0500 Dany Madden wrote:
> This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
> where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
> would require major rework if this is committed first.
>
> We will resend this after the other patches have
It's often useful to know the register state for interrupts in
the stack frame. In the below example (with this patch applied),
the important information is the state of the page fault.
A blatant case like this probably rather should have the page
fault regs passed down to the warning, but quite
ISA v2.06 (POWER7 and up) as well as e6500 support lbarx and lwarx.
Add a compile option that allows code to use it, and add support in
cmpxchg and xchg 8 and 16 bit values.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:23:28PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> ISA v2.06 (POWER7 and up) as well as e6500 support lbarx and lwarx.
Hmm, lwarx exists since original Power AFAIR, s/lwarx/lharx/ perhaps?
Same for the title of the patch and the CONFIG variable.
Gabriel
> Add a
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 14:26:22 +0800
xiakaixu1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Kaixu Xia
>
> Fix the following coccinelle warnings:
>
> ./arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c:476:3-15: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool
> variable
> ./arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c:504:3-15: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:35:13PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.
Many of these now applied, please update the series against my
tty-testing branch
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 21:32:40 -0500
Steven Rostedt (VMware) wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> If a ftrace callback does not supply its own recursion protection and
> does not set the RECURSION_SAFE flag in its ftrace_ops, then ftrace will
> make a helper trampoline to do so before
Hi Rob,
On 05.11.2020 22:11, Rob Herring wrote:
> Here's another batch of DWC PCI host refactoring. This series primarily
> moves more of the MSI, link up, and resource handling to the core
> code. Beyond a couple of minor fixes, new in this version is runtime
> detection of iATU regions instead
Le 05/11/2020 à 15:34, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
This also moves the 32s DABR match to C.
Is there a real benefit doing this ?
Similar to the previous patch this makes interrupt handler function
types more regular so they can be wrapped with the next patch.
bad_page_fault and do_break
Le 05/11/2020 à 15:34, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
Make mm fault handlers all just take the pt_regs * argument and load
DAR/DSISR from that. Make those that return a value return long.
This is done to make the function signatures match other handlers, which
will help with a future patch to add
Last use of RFI on PPC64 was removed by
commit b8e90cb7bc04 ("powerpc/64: Convert the syscall exit path to
use RFI_TO_USER/KERNEL").
Remove the macro.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc_asm.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Carl Jacobsen writes:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:19 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> Carl Jacobsen writes:
>> > The panic (on a call to malloc from static linked libcrypto) looks like
>> > this:
>>
>> What hardware is this on?
>>
>
> Thank you for looking into this.
>
> The system that's
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:14:27PM -0800, Carl Jacobsen wrote:
> I've got a SUSE 15.1 install (on ppc64le) that kernel panics on a very
> simple
> test program, built in a slightly unusual way.
>
> I'm compiling on SUSE 12, using gcc 4.8.3. I'm linking to a static
> copy of libcrypto.a (from
On Thu 2020-11-05 21:32:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file
> "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a
> callback to the function tracer was running.
>
> Changes since v2:
All hugetlb range freeing functions have a verification like the following,
which only differs by the mask used, depending on the page table level.
start &= MASK;
if (start < floor)
return;
if (ceiling) {
ceiling &= MASK;
if
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me.
>
> It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled
> with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It
> is good enough from my POV.
You mean the part
On Fri 2020-11-06 08:41:31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100
> Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me.
> >
> > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled
> > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit
This series attempts to improve the speed of interrupts and system calls
in two major ways.
Firstly, the SRR/HSRR registers do not need to be reloaded if they were
not used or clobbered fur the duration of the interrupt.
Secondly, an alternate return location facility is added for soft-masked
Prevent interrupt restore from allowing racing hard interrupts going
ahead of previous soft-pending ones, by using the soft-masked restart
handler to allow a store to clear the soft-mask while knowing nothing
is soft-pending.
This probably doesn't matter much in practice, but it's a simple
On 30/10/20 11:10 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
And there's a zero chance that drmgr will ever be fixed on LE?
It's always used the sysfs interface on LE, and the only way to provoke
it to attempt the syscalls is by doing something like this before
running the migration:
# echo 0 >
This makes no real difference yet except that HSRR type interrupts will
use hrfid to return. This is important for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 58 +++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 78
Have the real mode system call entry handler branch to the kernel
0xc000... address and then use mtmsrd to enable the MMU, rather than use
SRRs and rfid.
Commit 8729c26e675c ("powerpc/64s/exception: Move real to virt switch
into the common handler") implemented this style of real mode entry for
This is a variation of the exception table code which adjusts a failed
page fault return location if it was taken at an address specified in
an exception table, to a corresponding fixup handler address.
This patch adds a similar masked interrupt restart table that is checked
when when an
When an interrupt is taken, the SRR registers are set to return to
where it left off. Unless they are modified in the meantime, or the
return address or MSR are modified, there is no need to reload these
registers when returning from interrupt.
Introduce per-CPU flags that track the validity of
Andrew Donnellan writes:
> On 30/10/20 11:10 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>>> And there's a zero chance that drmgr will ever be fixed on LE?
>>
>> It's always used the sysfs interface on LE, and the only way to provoke
>> it to attempt the syscalls is by doing something like this before
>> running
The next patch would like to move interrupt return assembly code to a low
location before general text, so move it into its own file and include via
head_64.S
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/head-64.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 601
This frees up one more register (and takes advantage of that to
clean things up a little bit).
This register will be used in the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 34
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14
This extends the MSR[RI]=0 window a little further into the system
call in order to pair RI and EE enabling with a single mtmsrd.
XXX: May need to make this radix-only opt. - might take SLB or HPT faults
on the context tracking, etc.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
The restart table facility is used to return from interrupt without
disabling MSR[EE] or MSR[RI].
Interrupt return code is put into the low soft-masked region, and
critical code that has return SRRs set, soft-masked state set with no
soft-pending interrupts to replay, and no exit work, is put
On 2020-11-06 13:17, Dany Madden wrote:
This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
would require major rework if this is committed first.
We will resend this after the other patches have been applied.
I
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:129: warning: Cannot understand * @mtd:
the device
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:145: warning: Cannot understand * @mtd:
the device
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:161: warning: Cannot understand
This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
would require major rework if this is committed first.
We will resend this after the other patches have been applied.
Signed-off-by: Dany Madden
---
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:30:25 -0600 ljp wrote:
> On 2020-11-06 13:17, Dany Madden wrote:
> > This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
> > where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
> > would require major rework if this is committed first.
> >
> > We
On 2020-11-06 13:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:30:25 -0600 ljp wrote:
On 2020-11-06 13:17, Dany Madden wrote:
> This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
> where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
> would require major rework if
On 2020-11-06 13:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:30:25 -0600 ljp wrote:
On 2020-11-06 13:17, Dany Madden wrote:
> This reverts commit 16b5f5ce351f8709a6b518cc3cbf240c378305bf
> where it restructures do_reset. There are patches being tested that
> would require major rework if
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
niggly little warnings.
v1 => v2:
- Added tags
- Satisfied Miquel's review comments
Lee Jones (23):
mtd: mtdpart: Fix misdocumented function parameter 'mtd'
mtd:
38 matches
Mail list logo
