On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 19:21 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> There isn't one. The existing "opal-interrupts" from day one was a
> bit
> weird anyway, it's not a proper "interrupts" property to begin with,
> but it's unfixable now. Also I don't think there's a generic way to
> name
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 19:07 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > Recent versions of OPAL will be able to provide names for the
> > various
> > OPAL interrupts via a new "opal-interrupt-names" property. So let's
> > use them to make
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> Recent versions of OPAL will be able to provide names for the various
> OPAL interrupts via a new "opal-interrupt-names" property. So let's
> use them to make /proc/interrupts more informative.
I guess there's no point asking whether