Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

On Thu, 20 May 2021 13:50:37 + (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote: > This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. > > A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc > instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is > and will always be an array of

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

Christophe Leroy writes: > Le 15/06/2021 à 09:18, Michael Ellerman a écrit : >> Christophe Leroy writes: >>> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. >>> >>> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc >>> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

Le 15/06/2021 à 09:18, Michael Ellerman a écrit : Christophe Leroy writes: This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is and will always be an array of

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

Christophe Leroy writes: > This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. > > A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc > instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is > and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'. Why don't we use u32 *, to

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

Hi Michael, Le 20/05/2021 à 15:50, Christophe Leroy a écrit : This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.