In message 20060509171520.GA10886 at gate.ebshome.net you wrote:
After many years of doing embedded Linux stuff I still don't
understand why people are so fond of initrd.
For temporary stuff - tempfs is much better and flexible. For r/o
stuff - just make separate MTD partition (cramfs,
Hi all,
I am currently involve in development of Multi-Channel Controller (MCC)
driver for MPC8260 processor. Whenever we are loading the driver, on the
console we are receiving a print ttyS: 1 input overrun(s) along with
other prints of the driver and resulting in scrambled output.
Can
I try to make a new uRamdisk for my bubinga board(linux-2.6.14,PPC405EP).
actully I just copy the most of the files in the board,and compiled busybox
with ppc tools.
but when I use the new uRamdisk for a try,it just showed up this errors(as
follow),then reboot,back and forth...
Chris Dumoulin wrote:
Thanks for your reply; I found it very useful and interesting. Now, I have a
whole bunch
of questions.
You said that the temporary TLB entries setup in head_4xx.S will eventually
be replaced.
Where is the code that creates these new TLB entries later on? Are the
On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:20 -0700
Eugene Surovegin ebs at ebshome.net wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:41:01PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 10:38:19 -0400
geneSmith gd.smth at gmail.com wrote:
I have a ppc405gpr system with 64M ram and 4Meg flash in a
AM29LV320.
Hello,
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 06:33, s.maiti at tcs.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently involve in development of Multi-Channel Controller (MCC)
driver for MPC8260 processor. Whenever we are loading the driver, on the
console we are receiving a print ttyS: 1 input overrun(s) along with
On 5/10/06, hangtoo hangtoo at 163.com wrote:
I try to make a new uRamdisk for my bubinga board(linux-2.6.14,PPC405EP).
actully I just copy the most of the files in the board,and compiled busybox
with ppc tools.
but when I use the new uRamdisk for a try,it just showed up this errors(as
-Original Message-
From: Stevan Ignjatovic
Hello,
console we are receiving a print ttyS: 1 input overrun(s)
along with
other prints of the driver and resulting in scrambled output.
Can anyone suggest why this is happening? Is the driver
affecting the uart
driver?
As
Thanks, Dan! This is exactly the kind of feedback I was seeking.
Based on your comments and Wolfgang's comments, I conclude that:
1. The U-Boots on my MPC885ADS and MPC8272ADS boards are
unequivocally broken and should be replaced with ones from the
official U-Boot source
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:04:30AM -0400, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
[skip]
Unless I am completely mistaken, machine checks are not cause by
softwded are or programming errors, they are cause by hardware problems,
You can trivially trigger MachineChecks without any hardware problems
-
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:11:41PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:20 -0700
Eugene Surovegin ebs at ebshome.net wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:41:01PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 10:38:19 -0400
geneSmith gd.smth at gmail.com wrote:
I
On May 10, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Walter L. Wimer III wrote:
FYI, here's a table from the MPC885ADS PowerQUICC(tm) Application
Development System User's Guide, available on Freescale's website.
This table seems to confirm how they've configured their U-Boot -- the
IMMR is set to 0x0220...
ok, so I've got my BDI2000 working and talking to my 8260.
I read as much info as I could find on this but I still think I'm
missing something.
I have a uBoot image and I wait for the system to download my kernel.
Not through the BDI, I just let the uBoot boot image do it the normal
way. I
with root fs NFS
minted and later on the RAMDISK.
Appreciate the help.
Regards.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060510/0fb3653c/attachment.htm
Thanks Dan for the extra info.
Just to let everyone know even though this turned out to not
be our problem we here at Freescale are looking at how we
can make sure this does not happen in the future. We want
any uboot shipped with future Freescale boards to have the
correct behavior. We also
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 13:45 -0400, Dan Malek wrote:
This may be fine for non-Linux purposes, but it looks like we need
to spread some gospel to Freescale regarding the correct IMMR
address for U-Boot / Linux
I think you better be pointing fingers at the clueless person that
provided
16 matches
Mail list logo
