On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 08:39, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:37:56 +0100
Demke Torsten-atd012 torsten.demke at motorola.com wrote:
Hi all,
with a recent versions from Paulus merge-tree the compilation
of MPC85xx CDS failed with following output:
...
No, since it is
Hello,
Thanks for responding,
usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110)
We had that problem on a few of our boards as well.
For the old Icecube exists the possibility to mount two different USB
transceivers, one of them the ISP1107DH, the other one the
P11PAPW. Which
:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060731/57848ca3/attachment.htm
://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060731/ba4c1c6b/attachment.pgp
Uros Borovsak wrote:
Hello,
Can you at least give me some idea how difficult would it be to patch
USB part of kernel from 2.6.13 to 2.6.10?
As far as I know USB core undergone signifcant changes between 2.6.10
and 2.6.13. Still it's hard to tell how difficult would it be to
backport USB
Hi all,
with a recent versions from Paulus merge-tree the compilation
of MPC85xx CDS failed with following output:
...
LD arch/powerpc/lib/built-in.o
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.o
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.o
AS arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr.o
CC
Thanks for reply,
I made a mistake while typing the message.
In reality I was asking how difficult would it be to port USB part of
kernel from 2.6.10 to 2.6.13, but I mixed kernel version's when typing.
Mike Rapoport wrote:
Uros Borovsak wrote:
Hello,
Can you at least give me some
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of
Uros Borovsak
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:14 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Host USB on
Hi All
I have a MPC82xx Processor from Freescale with Linux 2.6.14 ( Can?t chance to
an new version).
My Problem is that I want to allocate a 64byte of memory in the dual ported ram
with an alignment of 64bytes. (Needed for SPI Parameter Ram)
the funktion cpm_dpalloc(64,64) returned 0x220 but
There is a bug in rheap for alignment. The patch is still hanging around.
Search rheap and alignment on the linuxppc-dev list for patch previously posted.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
(I go no replies last week, so I'll try again, with less explanation...)
If I master a DMA from a PCI device into a main memory buffer allocated
with dma_alloc_noncoherent(), I need to synchronise the destination
buffer using dma_sync_single_range_for_xxx() before and after the DMA.
But if the
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:37:56 +0100
Demke Torsten-atd012 torsten.demke at motorola.com wrote:
Hi all,
with a recent versions from Paulus merge-tree the compilation
of MPC85xx CDS failed with following output:
...
LD arch/powerpc/lib/built-in.o
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.o
was scrubbed...
Name: xilinx_pic.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 475 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060731/fcc319b1/attachment.obj
13 matches
Mail list logo