On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:21, Josh Boyer wrote:
4xx:
BAMBOO
Ported (mostly)
CPCI405
Doubt this will be ported.
Of course this will be ported! I will do that in th next weeks.
Matthias
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Hi all,
The engineers of Freescale have recognized a problem in the PSC SPI Slave
Select signal when there is a heavy ethernet loading. Textually they say:
I have tested the MPC5200B FEC and PSC6 SPI.
You are right. If there is heavy Ethernet loading, the PSC SPI can stop during
On Monday 28 January 2008 09:37, TXEMA LOPEZ wrote:
The engineers of Freescale have recognized a problem in the PSC SPI Slave
Select signal when there is a heavy ethernet loading. Textually they say:
I have tested the MPC5200B FEC and PSC6 SPI.
You are right. If there is heavy Ethernet
If you're starting a new design, I *highly* recommend using EDK9.2 with
MPMC3 and LL_TEMAC.
Using the Wizard in EDK9.2 and using the kernel from git.xilinx.com
everything will work fine out-of-the-box. Including the ethernet.
I've had troubles with the older (EDK9.1) TEMAC and GigE switches not
Do you really need u-boot??
I'm using an ML403 without u-boot. I've generated my .ace file with the
zImage.elf directly and it works fine.
If there is a choice of u-boot or not, why choose u-boot?
RJW.
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:10 -0800, Yedu Jathavedan wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded the
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:01:12 -0800
Grant Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/08 6:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:37:22 -0500
Steve Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Yes! I'm looking at 2.6.23.14 as I thought that was the newest
version. I completely
On 1/27/08 6:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:37:22 -0500
Steve Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Yes! I'm looking at 2.6.23.14 as I thought that was the newest
version. I completely missed seeing the 2.6.24 kit, thank you so much!!
FYI, 2.6.24 is considered fairly
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
You have to look at the System.map file, find the __log_buf symbol, and
then look at the address manually.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo
Ayres Severo
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:53 PM
Cc:
Steve,
I tried that, but the System.map is not the real memory address, it's
processed by the mmu isn't it?
This is my System.map: c01e0cc4 b __log_buf
when I try to look at the position 0xc01e0cc4 the debugger returns:
Error: Cannot access memory at address 0xc01e0cc4
Am I doing something
Grant,
my output is the following:
loaded at: 0040 004E919C
board data at: 007C
relocated to: 00404040 004040BC
zimage at: 00404E2C 004E620A
avail ram: 004EA000 8DA05119
Linux/PPC load: console=ttyUL0,9600
Uncompressing Linux...done.
Now booting the kernel
At 02:30 PM 1/28/2008, Steve Heflin wrote:
Josh, you're a life saver!! Your GIT tree is exactly what I've been
looking for. I have an AMCC440EPx based product that makes heavy use
of all the devices embedded in the microcontroller. I'll be able to
give that platform a very good testing.
Now can
Josh, you're a life saver!! Your GIT tree is exactly what I've been
looking for. I have an AMCC440EPx based product that makes heavy use
of all the devices embedded in the microcontroller. I'll be able to
give that platform a very good testing.
Now can you help me with BINUTILS? What version
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:46:47 -0500
Steve Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:30 PM 1/28/2008, Steve Heflin wrote:
Josh, you're a life saver!! Your GIT tree is exactly what I've been
looking for. I have an AMCC440EPx based product that makes heavy use
of all the devices embedded in the
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:52 -0600
Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:46:47 -0500
Steve Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:30 PM 1/28/2008, Steve Heflin wrote:
Josh, you're a life saver!! Your GIT tree is exactly what I've been
looking for. I have an
15 matches
Mail list logo
