Duy-Ky Nguyen wrote:
Hello,
I'm using u-boot 1.3.0 from the latest FreeScale Linux BSP MPC8313E-RDB.
Wrong mailing list. Try mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards,
Ben
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Laxmikant Rashinkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
I have a MPC8347 based board that runs linux-2.6.15.4 and 2.6.27.1.
With the older Linux, my driver is able to successfully request_irq()
interrupts 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 48.
But with the newer linux,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Kalle Pokki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to copy the ELDK 4.0 installation I had to a new Core 2 Quad
machine running 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, but the new machine refuses to
execute the cross compiler. Has anyone succeeded in running ELDK in
this kind
Hey Bruce,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
__asm__ __volatile__(lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1; twi 0,%0,0; isync : =r
(ret)
:
m (*addr));
They allow the compiler to use update and/or index mode for the
memory
operand.
Well that makes sense, U
struct gpio_dev {
struct gpio_reg *regs;
struct cdev cdev;
};
MODULE_AUTHOR(Ben Warren);
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
static int gpio_major_num;
static struct gpio_dev *gpio_devices;
static spinlock_t gpioLock[GPIO_NUM_BANKS];
extern phys_addr_t get_immrbase(void);
static u32 readGpioReg(u8 bank, u32
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/17/2008 07:01:10 AM:
I've attached a poorly-written-yet-functional GPIO driver that I wrote a
while ago for the MPC8349 (same as what you have for all intents and
purposes). It uses in_be32() and out_be32
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Parent wrote:
I'm building a linux distro for work, that runs on embedded systems
with either and ARM 9 or a PowerPC 603. I've had great luck building
a cross compiler w/ crosstools and using them in the compiler jail
created by Scratchbox. Now I am working on porting all
khollan wrote:
John Hahn wrote:
We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the u-boot.zip
srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for our ml403 based
development, we can build u-boot for
HI Stuart,
Stuart Hodgson wrote:
Hi,
I have been suing the eldk4.1 tool chain for a few months now and have
not not encountered any problems with building until now. I build for
two slightly different archs, ppc_85xx and ppx_82xx.
The problem I have come up against is related to some of
Fabio,
Note: I've changed the e-mail subject back to the original. In the
future, please ensure that it remains intact.
fabio777 wrote:
Thanks Ben,
Here it is
static struct fsl_spi_platform_data k_platform_data = {
.initial_spmode = 0,
.bus_num = 1,
Probably should be bus_num = 0
fabio777 wrote:
Has anyone been using this driver ?
I use it, on ARCH=powerpc, though.
For legacy reasons I need to keep the ppc=arch however I haven't found
out how to get this driver probed at start-up even basing my init on
Lublock.
The driver's expecting a platform device with
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 14:44 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
This device driver is a platform driver, so you need to register a
platform device somewhere in your board-specific init code that contains
the hardware details (memory mapping and IRQ #).
After
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 15:48 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
Here's what I use:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=113877891224982w=2
Thanks for the response Ben.
I have put the driver you mentioned in my linux source and added the
necessary information
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
Hello,
I am using an MPC8540 based embedded system with a Compact Flash card in
true IDE mode. The Compact Flash card is directly connected to the
MPC8540 bus without the use of a pcmcia adapter.
The Compact Flash card is being initialized correctly using the
Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700
Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400
Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007
Manil Gaouar wrote:
Hi all,
I have been trying many things to solve this problem, I found using a
JTAG that U-Boot is running from flash so my JP9 jumper should stay in
BCSR.
This is off-topic here. Please re-post to the U-boot mailing list, and
try to be more concise:
mailto:[EMAIL
Erik Christiansen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:08:47PM -0600, Alan Bennett wrote:
BDI 2000 Config File:
; initialize - FLASH BR0 OR0 (64 Mbyte)
;***
WM320xf0010100 0xfc001801
WM32 0xf0010104 0xfc0008c2
[FLASH]
Nethra,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 02:29 -0700, Nethra wrote:
hi,
I m using custom board same as eval board MPC8272ADS board.
IP assigned for both ethernets are...
ifconfig eth1 192.168.33.135 up
ifconfig eth1 netmask 255.255.248.0
route add default gw
Hi Jocke,
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:34 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
snip
I too am adding such a IRQ for my PHY connected to external IRQ2.
The PHY is connetced to UCC2.
I have this in my DTS for the PHY:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
#address-cells = 1;
Hi Antonio,
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:30 +0200, DI BACCO ANTONIO - technolabs wrote:
Hi all,
how can I avoid that fs_enet driver uses its associated phy? My problem
is that my FEC is attached to a switch and three other ports of the
switch are connected to three physical connectors. I don't
Hi Mohammad,
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:41 +, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:
Hi all,
well I could bring up the grant's kernel on ml403 completely. the root file
system was over nfs.
when I use a 100mbits link for connection to ml403 , every thing is working
suitably.
but when I use a
Alex,
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:29 +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply Ben, but I think my problem is slightly different. It
is not
that the sense (high/low/rising/falling) of the interrupt is wrong, but that
the
kernel will not allow me to register the handler.
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 15:15 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I assume you're code doesn't look exactly like this. You'll need to
use the virq in the request_irq()... its most likely just random luck
if things are working and you aren't using the virq returned from
irq_create_mapping()
Alex,
Follow this thread...
http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embeddedm=116849062702002w=2
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:45 +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to port a driver from 2.6.11 to 2.6.21 and I'm stuck on the
following line:
request_irq(MPC83xx_IRQ_EXT5,
Thanks Arnd,
--- Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 April 2007, Ben Warren wrote:
The cross-compiled glibc that is included in ELDK 4.0 doesn't seem to
have support for POSIX semaphores. I get the following runtime errors:
sem_open: Function not implemented
Zhivko,
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 16:51 +0200, powerpc440 wrote:
Hello all,
I have multiple boards, based on ppc405ep (which include on-chip two
ethernet ports). I'm configure the MAC address in u-boot and all works
great. The problem appears when I use two or more boards in one network,
Gary,
--- Gary Kenaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been evaluating Freescale 2.6.11, Wind River
2.6.14, and am now
attempting Denx 2.6.19 (from ELDK 4.1) - running on
the Rev 1.0 MPC8349E
MDS (V1.1 CPU). I boot 2.6.19.2 using the factory
u-boot 1.1.3 and the
kernel immediately hangs:
Hello,
Is there an API call, either Linux or PowerPC-specific, for determining
the cause of the last reset? I can certainly read the RSR myself, but
why bother if the information's available elsewhere.
thanks,
Ben
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Bruce,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We're designing a new product and we want to put a
CF card in it. We're
thinking the easiest way to do that is to put in a
PCI-CF bridge and we
would like to use the TI1520 because it's industrial
rated which we need.
We can get the parts
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 20:28 -0800, Nethra wrote:
thanks...
what are the steps to create jffs2 image?
Here's a good link on building a JFFS2 filesystem:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/RootFileSystemOnAJFFS2FileSystem
do i need to disable nfs option in kernel?
No. Both can happily
Bruce,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this isn't the right forum for this but I
can't seem to find a
generic PPC mailing list.
I'm trying to get a global timer going on an
MPC834x, and the way I learn
is to just play with HW, so I've got an Abatron
BDI2K hooked up to my
--- Nethra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks ben,
I have already tried to build jffs2 image as per
link mentioned using
mkfs.jffs2 utility, but mkfs.jffs2 is absent in
host...so i downloded
mkfs.jffs2 from net and used the same to create the
image.Is it the correct
way?
Sounds
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:18 +0530, pjmaiya wrote:
Dear Ben,
I have tried following option, with host as ppc_8xx, since we are using
mpc860 processor and also we are using montavista provided compiler
(ppc_8xx).
Our embedded target runs on montavista linux with mpc860 processor and
Tom,
I feel your pain.
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 16:55 -0500, Morrison, Tom wrote:
All,
I've looked at the Documentation/powerpc/booting_without_of.txt,
and this gives an explanation of the internal parts of the dts file,
but it doesn't tell me how to practically pass it to the kernel
Pjmaiya,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:32 +0530, pjmaiya wrote:
Hi,
Can anybody give me link/built in package or source code for
implmenting CLI for embedded system on linux. We have tried to
implement our own CLI on linux(with bash shell as base), but it is
massive work since we need to
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:29 +0100, Frank Prepelica wrote:
I got a problem. After rebooting linux system on the target,
the target “hangs”. How could I get that the target makes a reset
to start u-boot or linux again?
You'll need to provide some details. With the information you've
Russell,
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:28 -0800, Russell McGuire wrote:
arch/ppc/boot/common/ns16550.c error: ‘SERIAL_PORT_DFNS’ undeclared
here ……
I don't think you should be building any code there... Are you using
ARCH=powerpc (you should be)
regards,
Ben
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 12:14 -0800, Russell McGuire wrote:
Ben,
That could be the problem
I am building using ARCH=ppc
What is the difference between the two?
I'm not by any means the expert, but I believe that ARCH=powerpc is a
merge of 32 and 64 bit PowerPC architectures (plus all
Thanks Vitaly!
--- Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, you do not miss - this is an issue. In fact MDIO
bus was changed for numeric for gianfar-stuff, and
has been remaining string for fs_enet. I think it
makes sense to average this up, and will try to do
that once will get 8349-mitx
Vitaly,
Yes, I was thinking about something like 0:1001 or
0:101 where 1 at the end respects duplexity.
Putting it into devtree is good but we'll need to
unify the interface first.
I'm sure you're working on lots of other things right
now, so I'll go ahead and code something like this up
Hello,
I'm porting my board from 2.6.17 to 2.6.19 kernel, and
now external interrupts aren't working any more. I'm
using ARCH=powerpc on an MPC8349-based custom board.
With the old code, we called ipic_init() from board
init code with a table of IRQ senses. In the newer
kernel, ipic_init()
Hello,
My custom board has a couple of Ethernet switches attached via RvMII to
the 'Gianfar' controllers of an MPC8349 CPU. We're using SPI instead of
MDIO for control of the switches, and it looked like the 'fixed.c' PHY
driver was the right thing to use. BTW, I'm using a 2.6.19 kernel.
When
Henk,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 21:59 +0100, Henk Stegeman wrote:
I'm working on an SPI procol driver on the MPC52XX.
I spend some time in trying to find the best location for calling
spi_register_board_info () (which basically registers the relations
between protocol drivers and the SPI chip
Hi Bala,
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:58 +0530, s.balamurugan wrote:
Hello all,
This is bala, I am using MPC8360 board and compact
flash is connected via Local Bus Controller(UPM).
I have the following questions
what are the necessary document to be read for writting the
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 19:10 -0800, Muruga Ganapathy wrote:
The error message might be due to the wrong/improper configuration of
interrupt and its attributes like whether it is level/edge sensitive.
G.Muruganandam
Thanks Ganapathy. Turns out it was a hardware problem. In True IDE
mode
Hello,
I'm bringing up the Compact Flash interface on a custom board and am
almost there, but not quite. I've seen many messages in the past about
the 'lost interrupt' message, but I couldn't find anything corresponding
closely to my situation. Can anyone shed some light?
Here's a snippet of
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 19:11 +0800, enorm wrote:
After power on, cpu reads instruction from certain addr. But how does it
know how many bits he can read at once.
This can't be generalized. Read the Reset, Clocking and
Initialization, or equivalent, chapter of your CPU's reference manual.
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:13 -0400, Sachin Rane wrote:
Hi,
I am using AMCC PPC440GX evaluation board.
I want to access serial EEPROM (AP31_U29) present on the board.
I couldn't find the I2C address for this chip in the board manuals.
Could you tell me where I can find it?
These
Tim,
--- Martin, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When I just telnet
locally from the serial console to the board (using
the loopback IP
127.0.0.1) the telnet daemon connects, but the login
program doesn't
give me a chance to type a username or login.
Question: What stupid thing
Tim,
--- Martin, Tim tim.martin at viasat.com wrote:
snip
When I just telnet
locally from the serial console to the board (using
the loopback IP
127.0.0.1) the telnet daemon connects, but the login
program doesn't
give me a chance to type a username or login.
Question: What stupid
Thanks Kumar,
As always, you're several steps ahead of me.
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 18:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I know I posted a patch for cf-ide.c to lkml some time ago, this was
to do a CF in true ide mode using the 83xx localbus.
Hello,
A 'newbie-to-platform-devices' question:
In a patch that Kumar just sent for a compact flash device, the resource
data (I/O addresses, IRQ # etc.) are retrieved from the platform system.
I guess I can either modify the device tree in U-boot by adding
additional nodes, or instantiate a
Kumar,
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:25 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
The only code in u-boot was the UPM setup code, I'm happy to send
that to you.
If it's no trouble, that would be great. My HW guy is calculating the
settings, but this stuff can be frustrating to debug. BTW - was the
system bus
Thanks Vitaly,
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 22:06 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
I'd suggest to make a look at LDD concerning linux device model...
Thanks. I'll read it again. My little brain absorbs this stuff very
slowly.
For platform device, there's no need to cope with u-boot at all. You'll
Hello,
I have a custom board where we've hung a CompactFlash on the local bus
of an MPC8349 processor, intending to use it in 'True IDE' mode. The
closest thing I've found in the kernel tree is
drivers/ide/ppc/ide-m8xx.c, although it's *very* possible I'm not
looking in the right place.
I
Keith,
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:53 +0200, Keith Redfern wrote:
I am trying to dynamically link busybox with the correct libraries but
run into problems with directory paths and CC/LD flags.
I am using the toolchain supplied with ELDK and my target board is
ppc_8xx based. The busybox version
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 22:11 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Yes, SuSE has always found interesting ways to break compatibility.
That's why I avoid it. IIRC, SuSE provides a special tool linux32
which has to be used to run 32-bit applications on a x86_64 system.
Don't ask me why they
Arun,
Please keep the mailing list CC'd on all correspondence. As you can
see, I've been busy for the past week and am sure there are others
listening that are more qualified to answer. Anyway...
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:33 +0530, Arun Kumar wrote:
Hi Ben ,
I guess this is the last stage
Arun,
Looks like there are still some things broken in your MTD partition
definition. I highly recommend that when debugging this, you boot from
an NFS mount. That way you can modify files off-line (ie. from your
development host). I'll point out a few things, but you're going to
have to surf
Hi Arun,
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 20:26 +0530, Arun Kumar wrote:
Hi ,
Can anyone help me in this naive problem ?
Then a naive answer is most fitting... Turns out that's my specialty.
#
# Memory Technology Devices (MTD)
#
CONFIG_MTD=y
CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG_VERBOSE=2
Hello,
Has anyone implemented devices like the Philips PCA954x I2C bus muxes
under the /sysfs device model? I have some optical transponders on my
board that through the wisdom of some committee all have the same fixed
I2C address. To get around this, we put them behind muxes, creating
Thanks Travis,
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Travis B. Sawyer wrote:
I have a driver for 2.4.x that works with our SFP/XFPs. We also have a
bunch of other 'stuff'
hanging off of muxes. I haven't given it a go on 2.6, but I have it
compiled and it doesn't complain on
startup.
Way cool! Thanks a lot. I'll try it out when my hardware comes in...
regards,
Ben
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:51 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone implemented devices like the Philips PCA954x I2C bus muxes
under the /sysfs
cat /proc/modules
If you want more detailed information about a module (locations
of .text, .data, .bss etc), enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS in your kernel and
you'll see lots of goodness in the /sys/module/YOUR MODULE/sections
directory.
Do yourself a favor and browse
Mathieu,
Thanks for responding!
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:42 +0200, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
Do you mean that you can't even created a void file on / as root ? Else
can you then put for instance text in it ? My point is can or can't you
first create a new fs node and then can you write to
Chetan,
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 10:18 -0400, Anantharaman Chetan-W16155 wrote:
Did you check to see if your flash banks are unlocked?
According to U-Boot, only the first four sectors are locked. My JFFS2
partition is in sectors 37-52 (1-based). I'll definitely look more
deeply into this,
Mathieu,
IMHO, it's not a generation-time issue
This is starting to look to me like a generation-time issue. I built
another JFFS2 partition out of a random directory on my workstation, and
it's behaving properly:
$mkfs.jffs2 -U -d util -b -e 0x2 -o /tftpboot/prism/myutil.img
On the
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 15:38 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
This is starting to look to me like a generation-time issue. I built
another JFFS2 partition out of a random directory on my workstation, and
it's behaving properly:
Sorry for filling people's inboxes, but it turns out the problem
Hello,
When I boot from a JFFS2 file system on my eval board, the file system
is effectively read-only, and I can't figure out why. I'm pretty sure
the kernel's configured for R/W MTD block access. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
The hardware in use is:
Freescale MPC8349EMDS eval board.
Hello,
Does anybody have a solid config file for the Freescale MPC8349EMDS eval
board? I guess the MPC8349ADS would be fine too, since I've been told
they're the same thing. I've been tweaking the file named
'mcp8349e.cfg' that shipped with the BDI, but it's a bit flaky with my
board. In
Hello,
I'm a noobie to this CPU, and am utterly confused with how the bits are
ordered on the GPIO ports. I imagine it's the same as all Freescale
PPCs, but who knows. Anyway...
Using an MPC8349MDS eval board, I have one LED to play with. From the
schematic, it's connected to GPIO1[1]. From
Sorry for wasting bandwidth (again). Turns out my schematic is for an
earlier spin of the board.
regards,
Ben
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:06 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
Hello,
I'm a noobie to this CPU, and am utterly confused with how the bits
73 matches
Mail list logo
