MPC8245 refers to the integrated product (core + peripherals, all on
one chip). The MPC8245 has a powerpc 603e core (also known as the
G2). That's a classic 32-bit powerpc, so the assembler reference you
want is:
http://www.freescale.com/files/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
Hope this helps,
MPC8245 refers to the integrated product (core + peripherals, all on
one chip). The MPC8245 has a powerpc 603e core (also known as the
G2). That's a classic 32-bit powerpc, so the assembler reference you
want is:
http://www.freescale.com/files/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
Hope this helps,
On Aug 28, 2006, at 8:54 PM, enorm wrote:
Hi,
Some naive questions about u-boot for MPC85xx, the definition of
some macro in ppc_asm.tmpl. Can anyone there explain them to me
please?
1) In GET_GOT(x) what does lwz r0,0b-1b(r14) ; do? what does
0b-1b stands for, or the meaning of
Hi!
There's no string.h in include/asm-ppc because this is one of the
header files that has been merged between 32 and 64-bit powerpc. It
now lives in include/asm-powerpc with all the other merged headers.
Only headers specific to 32-bit ppc have been left in include/asm-
ppc. For a
Could you try to be more specific? What processor do you have, what
linux version are you running, and what do you mean exactly when you
say you encountered PPC exception 0x320? As far as I know, the
powerpc architecture does not define an exception 0x320. 0x300 is
usually DSI on
Is there some error message you can show me?
-B
On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:03 AM, jeanwelly wrote:
Hi Becky Bruce,
I'm using PPC 750... Just as you said, 0x300 is for DSI, and I
guess they are a set of exceptions, not just one. And 0x320 is one
of them.
I got a board crash, and PPC alarmed
So,
in include/asm-ppc64/cacheflush.h is the following:
static inline void flush_icache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned
long stop)
{
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE))
__flush_icache_range(start, stop);
}
On the 32-bit side, we don't need the feature
can get a copy of the 750 User's Manual at:
http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/MPC750UM.pdf
The exception information is in Chapter 4.
Cheers,
Becky
On May 29, 2006, at 9:22 AM, jeanwelly wrote:
Hi Becky Bruce,
Sorry for late response. I got mail traffic...
I encountered
I think we need to hold off on this particular patch for a few days.
I took a look at the manual section you're referencing here, and sure
enough, it says that you shouldn't set both bits in the same mtspr
instruction. The manual says this in more than one place, in fact.
However, that
I believe you can use -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections when you
compile and link. If you have binutils prior to 2.16, this only
works with -static.
-B
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:07 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
Hi,
I have few functions in a C file but those are not
called at present. Even
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:07 PM, meerkat wrote:
Figure that out, the bootstrap actually mapped the first 16M from
C00 to
the physicall address,
so calling a c routine, as long as it is in the first 16M, is OK
I think you're still not understanding the fact that bl is a
*relative*
).
If you see bl foo, it's relative. It has to be, because that's how
the instruction works. Also, it's not really in a different module,
it's just a different file, but it's all linked into a single
executable image.
Cheers,
-Becky
Regards,
Jim
Becky Bruce wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007
On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:59 AM, mike zheng wrote:
I use BDI to debug these two instructions. And here are the output
of BDI just before the rfi. The content of R6, R7 is different
from SRR0(SPR26) and SRR1(SPR27).
I see you have not printed the pc/nia once you stop. Are you sure
you're
On Mar 10, 2008, at 3:15 PM, jie han wrote:
Hi guys,
I want to simulate compile mutli-core using sequoia(IBM/AMCC 44x
processor) source code under kernel arch/powerpc directory.I want
to define CONFIG_SMP, I sould define CONFIG_STD_MMU at first,but
AMCC 44x don't need to config
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:34:37PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it
with
linuxppc-dev?
That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
imagine Paul would have
15 matches
Mail list logo
