On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:28:07PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> So we'd have a PPS source, PPS sink, source clock and destination clock,
> right? In the code, would "master" become simply "source" or "pps_source"?
yes
> > I'm not asking you to rename everything, but if you have the time and
>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:15:08AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 05:11:51PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> > The overall board design for my use case is that there's an SoC with an
> > embedded DSA switch, and hanging off of 3 ports of that embedded switch
> > are 3 ex
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 05:11:51PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The overall board design for my use case is that there's an SoC with an
> embedded DSA switch, and hanging off of 3 ports of that embedded switch
> are 3 external switches. Every networking device (the DSA master for the
> embedded
As discussed in this email thread:
https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/37047555/
there is a desire to synchronize multiple DSA switches in a
boundary_clock_jbod setup, using a PPS signal, and the ts2phc program
already offers a solid base.
This patch series extends the ts2phc progra
