Re: [Linuxptp-devel] linuxptp and uclibc-ng

2020-09-28 Thread Heiko Thiery
Hi Richard, Am Di., 29. Sept. 2020 um 01:01 Uhr schrieb Richard Cochran : > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Heiko Thiery wrote: > > I just want to understand when the defines/functions coming from > > missing.h should come into account. What uclib(-ng) version should be > > support her

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] linuxptp and uclibc-ng

2020-09-28 Thread Richard Cochran
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Heiko Thiery wrote: > I just want to understand when the defines/functions coming from > missing.h should come into account. What uclib(-ng) version should be > support here? I think the audience for uClibc is small, and so we needn't support every last uC

[Linuxptp-devel] linuxptp and uclibc-ng

2020-09-28 Thread Heiko Thiery
Hi all, I just want to understand when the defines/functions coming from missing.h should come into account. What uclib(-ng) version should be support here? For example when using the linuxptp package in buildroot we need to remove the clock_nanosleep declaration [1] for uclibc-ng. [1] https:/