On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:38:28AM +, Y.b. Lu wrote:
> May I confirm that we don't have to use new clock types for PTP End Instance
> and PTP Relay Instance?
> PTP End Instance should be OC tyoe,
The end instance is already implemented. Why change it now?
> and PTP Relay Instance should be
Any fix will be provided soon for the "bad message" errors and protection from
buggy HW?
Thanks,
Raveendra
On Tuesday, October 8, 2019, 8:12:19 AM GMT+5:30, Richard Cochran
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:18:21PM +, Vincent Li X wrote:
> This issue hits us over and over again.
HI,
Following messages observed with ptp4l.
Jan 02 22:17:02 mavdu.local ptp4l[16312]: ptp4l[166601.457]: timed out while
polling for tx timestamp
Jan 02 22:17:02 mavdu.local ptp4l[16312]: [166601.457] timed out while polling
for tx timestamp
Jan 02 22:17:02 mavdu.local ptp4l[16312]: ptp4l[16
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:23:44 + (UTC), RAVEENDRA M via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> Any fix will be provided soon for the "bad message" errors and
> protection from buggy HW?
I'm afraid this is something you'll have to sort out with the hardware
vendor. If they sold you the box as IEEE 1588-2008 co
This is an immature implementation of non-GM 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge
which is based on P2P TC.
- Add BRIDGE clock type.
- Create bridge.c which is a copy of p2p_tc.c.
- Implement tc_fwd_folup_tlv() for bridge instead of tc_fwd_folup()
used for p2p_tc.
- Create time-aware-bridge.cfg.
Signe
Hi Richard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 10:11 PM
> To: Y.b. Lu
> Cc: Rodney Cummings ;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> Андрей Иванов ; Erik Hons
> Subject: Re: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-user
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:24:50AM +, Y.b. Lu wrote:
> [Y.b. Lu] Sorry, I didn't mean to change it now.
> Initially I thought that end instance was different with OC. Current end
> instance of linuxptp was totally an OC without utilizing follow_up_tlv and
> free running clock.
> I thought 802
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:26:14PM +, RAVEENDRA M via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
>
> Jan 02 22:17:02 mavdu.local ptp4l[16312]: ptp4l[166601.457]: timed out while
> polling for tx timestamp
> Jan 02 22:17:02 mavdu.local ptp4l[16312]: [166601.457] timed out while
> polling for tx timestamp
> Jan 02
