On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:12:02PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Here, we are making the implicit assumption that all ptp clock devices
> will always have /dev/ptpX format. I don't think anyone is crazy enough
> to rename these devices...
(Not yet, anyways ;^)
> An alternative (requiring kernel i
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:40 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/15] posix_clock_open: derive PHC
> index from device name if possible
>
> On Wed, Aug 05,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:40 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/15] posix_clock_open: derive PHC
> index from device name if possible
>
> On Wed, Aug
