On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:19 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:07:38PM +, Daniel Le wrote:
> > I understand that linuxptp code base as is requires Linux kernel
> > version 3.0 or newer. For platforms where kernel 3.x is not yet
> > available, is it possible to backport l
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 17:47 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Looks good. I have a few nits to pick...
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:34:36AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/hwstamp_ctl.8 b/hwstamp_ctl.8
> > index cece74f61866..7bfdf4451839 100644
> > --- a/hwstamp_ctl.8
> > +++
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:07:38PM +, Daniel Le wrote:
> I understand that linuxptp code base as is requires Linux kernel
> version 3.0 or newer. For platforms where kernel 3.x is not yet
> available, is it possible to backport linuxptp into a kernel
> 2.6.30+?
(Everything is possible.)
> If
Hello List,
I understand that linuxptp code base as is requires Linux kernel version 3.0 or
newer. For platforms where kernel 3.x is not yet available, is it possible to
backport linuxptp into a kernel 2.6.30+? If so, what would need to be done?
Does it make sense to modify the hardware abstrac
Looks good. I have a few nits to pick...
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:34:36AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
...
> diff --git a/hwstamp_ctl.8 b/hwstamp_ctl.8
> index cece74f61866..7bfdf4451839 100644
> --- a/hwstamp_ctl.8
> +++ b/hwstamp_ctl.8
> @@ -15,11 +15,10 @@ hwstamp_ctl \- set time stamping poli
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:34:35AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> diff --git a/missing.h b/missing.h
> index d6b2355cb8fb..5f21fe58d069 100644
> --- a/missing.h
> +++ b/missing.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ enum _missing_hwtstamp_tx_types {
> };
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef SIOCGHWTSTAMP
> +#define SIOCGHWTSTA
Never mind, this is a socket option, not an ioctl. My bad.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. W
