richardcoch...@gmail.com; linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Some general questions.
> >
> > Many thanks Richard. Follow up:
> >
> >
> > >Well, there is a driver bug. There is a fix upstream, but your old
> > >4.2 kernel
> -Original Message-
> From: TheMazzim M [mailto:maz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 10:52 AM
> To: richardcoch...@gmail.com; linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Some general questions.
>
> Many thanks Richard. Fol
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:51:33PM +0200, TheMazzim M wrote:
> Imagine that. An actual error log that describes the problem!
:)
> Upgrading completely could compromise a very stable platform for other
> tasks this stack executes.
> Which version has the fix??
I'll have to check the git logs. Pi
Chris,
>PTP timestamp can be in either the MAC layer or the PHY layer.
Thanks for the clarification. I was under the false impression that
"hardware" timestamping was unique to the PHY layer only, thus my confusion
with the kernel settings.
Marco
Many thanks Richard. Follow up:
>Well, there is a driver bug. There is a fix upstream, but your old
>4.2 kernel lacks the fix. You can either upgrade your kernel or
>back port the fix.
Imagine that. An actual error log that describes the problem!
Upgrading completely could compromise a very st
TheMazzim M wrote:
> BUT, if I look at the kernel config file for 4.2.0-27-generic Ubuntu 14.04
> kernel, I discover that:
>
> # CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING is not set
>
> Question: Why is this not consistent with what ethtool reports??
I did not see an explicit answer to this part of your qu
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:59:12AM +0200, TheMazzim M wrote:
> 2) The igb driver is loaded for the NIC on this PC104. As a result, the ptp
> module is loaded as well.
You can believe the ethtool output.
> As I understand, this is further evidence that
> hardware time stamping is supported?? Yet,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:59:12AM +0200, TheMazzim M wrote:
> BUT, if I look at the kernel config file for 4.2.0-27-generic Ubuntu 14.04
> kernel, I discover that:
>
> # CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING is not set
>
> Question: Why is this not consistent with what ethtool reports?? Or are
> thes
