> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2020 8:45 PM
> To: pavan-lakote
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple
unicast
> maste
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:03:50AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Looks like the patch works fine. With this patch irrespective of port state
> if BMCA selects new master it will trigger unicast state change, well port
> state change will still trigger unicast state change.
Okay, th
nal Message-
> From: pavan-lakote [mailto:pavan-lak...@looptelecom.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 9:36 AM
> To: 'Richard Cochran'
> Cc: 'linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple
unica
Okay, Let me try this. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2020 12:28 PM
> To: pavan-lakote
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails wh
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:30:22AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:27:56AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> > Can you please give me an rough idea when to expect a patch?
>
> Try this.
Ping?
Can you please try this patch and see if it fixes the issue?
If it does, then I'l
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:27:56AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> Can you please give me an rough idea when to expect a patch?
Try this.
Thanks,
Richard
---8<---
diff --git a/port.c b/port.c
index fa49663..db3e9ac 100644
--- a/port.c
+++ b/port.c
@@ -3209,6 +3209,9 @@ int port_state_update(struct
> From: Keller, Jacob E [mailto:jacob.e.kel...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 5:33 AM
> To: pavan-lakote; 'Richard Cochran'
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple unicast
> maste
linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple
unicast
> master
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:56:36AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> > We do synchronize the clock but using our own clock servo algorithm.
> > That's the reason
> -Original Message-
> From: pavan-lakote
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 7:57 PM
> To: 'Richard Cochran'
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple unicast
> master
>
> &g
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:56:36AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> We do synchronize the clock but using our own clock servo algorithm.
> That's the reason we wanted to run ptp4l as free running clock.
> Is there anything I'm missing here to understand?
Okay, the unicast subscriptions will not update
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 10:45 AM
> To: pavan-lakote
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple
unicast
&g
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:12:49AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> If you have observed, when clock is "free_running" the clock servo state
> always remains in "SERVO_UNLOCKED" this causes the port to always remain in
> "UNCALIBRATED" state.
Oh, I didn't see that you had free_running=1
> So when un
10, 2020 1:19 AM
To: pavan-lakote
Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple unicast
master
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:25:12AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> Below is the ptp4l configuration,
>
> [global]
>
> domainNumber
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:25:12AM +0800, pavan-lakote wrote:
> Below is the ptp4l configuration,
>
> [global]
>
> domainNumber 4
>
> dscp_event 5
>
> dscp_general 5
Your mailer is double spacing. That makes your logs hard to read.
> ptp4l[4516445.706]: selected best master clock 00.
14 matches
Mail list logo
