[linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Xavier Raynaud
Hi, I'm currently working on some preference pages for gcov and gprof, and I discovered that there is no root categrory for linuxtools preference pages. Changelog, Gcov, Library Hover, Man pages, SystemTap, Tracing preferences are all at root level of the eclipse preferences. What about creat

Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Andrew Overholt
The problem is that some of these aren't C/C++ and not all of them are Linux-focused :) On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Xavier Raynaud wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on some preference pages for gcov and gprof, and I > discovered that there is no root categrory for linuxtools preference

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Git branches reduction

2013-04-05 Thread Roland Grunberg
> And the last question is about the stable* branches. I'm even leaning towards > removing all pre 1.0 (aka stable-0.*) but no hard feelings if someone sees > them valuable. > If we're certain that we don't have to make any changes to a particular branch (ie. no longer supported/etc.) then I don'

Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Marc Khouzam
Also, I don't think that preferences should be labeled by project name. Users should not need to know that some preferences are from the Linux Tools project or from the CDT project. Therefore I think things like Gcov, and other C/C++ preferences provided by Linux Tools should go under C/C++, but

Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Andrew Overholt
+1 On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marc Khouzam wrote: > ** > Also, I don't think that preferences should be labeled by project name. > Users should not need to know that some preferences are from the Linux > Tools project > or from the CDT project. > > Therefore I think things like Gcov, and o

Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Xavier Raynaud
Ok, In this case, I will just move Gcov preferences in "C/C++" category. Many thanks, Xavier On 04/05/2013 05:26 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote: Also, I don't think that preferences should be labeled by project name. Users should not need to know that some preferences are from the Linux Tools project

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #1358

2013-04-05 Thread hudsonbuild
See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https

Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages

2013-04-05 Thread Camilo Bernal
Would we want to consider implementing a "Profiling" category page under C/C++ where our plug-ins could contribute their preferences to? This would be consistent with the rest of the C/C++ categories (e.g. "Build", "Debug"). However, I think it would be better suited for it to be implemented on

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #1359

2013-04-05 Thread hudsonbuild
See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://de

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #1360

2013-04-05 Thread hudsonbuild
See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://de