Jason Gerecke said the following on 10/13/2012 02:50 AM:
Just need your S-O-B and I'll push this patch up :)
Opps, here is is :-)
Cheers,
Olivier.
From 539c8273e0675c203b288274d15765f03f9a3375 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan ofour...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:57:58
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:06 -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
Was going through my mail looking for patches I may have missed for
the upcoming xf86-input-wacom release and noticed that this libwacom
patch hadn't seen any activity.
Would somebody more familiar with libwacom/GNOME care to give this
We want libwacom to react to changes in Makefile.am's
Long writeup:
http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2011/09/08/am_maintainer_mode-is-not-cool/
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
configure.ac | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:06 -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
Was going through my mail looking for patches I may have missed for
the upcoming xf86-input-wacom release and noticed that this libwacom
patch hadn't seen any activity.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
We want libwacom to react to changes in Makefile.am's
Long writeup:
http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2011/09/08/am_maintainer_mode-is-not-cool/
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
For what its
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:02:28PM -0500, Chris Bagwell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
We want libwacom to react to changes in Makefile.am's
Long writeup:
http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2011/09/08/am_maintainer_mode-is-not-cool/
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:58:26PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Sorry, updated 2nd patch, meant to print StatusLEDs=, not just
LEDs= in libwacom_print_device_description()
From 0216649221b0b4776d322ae25e1b7dba8d07dd84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan ofour...@redhat.com
Date:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
snip
a few things:
- please rename to print-device or something more explanatory
- you'll need to split this up, ./test as part of TESTS would be run as part
of make check and always fail (it expects the device name)
I'd be doing that
